From 0cd5902ba530ee427bdf318c974e07bb856588b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Yegge Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:50:58 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] bd sync: 2025-11-04 09:50:58 --- .beads/beads.jsonl | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/.beads/beads.jsonl b/.beads/beads.jsonl index f867f8bd..9bc348e1 100644 --- a/.beads/beads.jsonl +++ b/.beads/beads.jsonl @@ -34,8 +34,9 @@ {"id":"bd-1f64","content_hash":"80f404d7c0f06c7f4bc6d52ac02c1a002a95ac7cb60c6485b2ceed5e013dad75","title":"Add comprehensive tests for config.yaml issue-prefix migration","description":"The GH #209 config.yaml migration lacks test coverage:\n\nMissing tests:\n- config.SetIssuePrefix() edge cases (empty file, comments, malformed YAML)\n- config.GetIssuePrefix() with various config states\n- MigrateConfigToYAML() automatic migration logic\n- bd init writing to config.yaml instead of DB\n- bd migrate DB→config.yaml migration path\n\nTest scenarios needed:\n1. SetIssuePrefix with empty config.yaml\n2. SetIssuePrefix with existing config.yaml (preserves other settings)\n3. SetIssuePrefix with commented issue-prefix line\n4. SetIssuePrefix atomic write (temp file cleanup)\n5. GetIssuePrefix fallback behavior\n6. MigrateConfigToYAML when config.yaml missing prefix but DB has it\n7. MigrateConfigToYAML when both missing (detect from issues)\n8. MigrateConfigToYAML when config.yaml already has prefix (no-op)\n9. Integration test: fresh bd init writes to config.yaml only\n10. Integration test: upgrade from v0.21 DB migrates to config.yaml\n\nPriority 1 because this is a user-facing migration affecting all users upgrading to v0.22.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T22:33:43.08753-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T22:46:16.306565-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T22:46:16.306565-08:00"} {"id":"bd-1ls","content_hash":"75b2e270f29e02eecdcdf9f75558efd278276f99c7eeb8f1dc1b81519e9881ef","title":"Override test","description":"## Overview\n\n[Describe the high-level goal and scope of this epic]\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- [ ] Criteria 1\n- [ ] Criteria 2\n- [ ] Criteria 3\n\n## Background\n\n[Provide context and motivation]\n\n## Scope\n\n**In Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n\n**Out of Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n","design":"## Architecture\n\n[Describe the overall architecture and approach]\n\n## Components\n\n- Component 1: [description]\n- Component 2: [description]\n\n## Dependencies\n\n[List external dependencies or constraints]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] All child issues are completed\n- [ ] Integration tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation is updated\n- [ ] Code review completed\n","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:10.01471-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T22:07:10.946574-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T22:07:10.946574-08:00","labels":["epic"]} {"id":"bd-1vv","content_hash":"1db907ddb55edaf7a4c06a566c4e1b8244fcd9ba5d7e2fca4d5c053e424ac515","title":"Add WebSocket support","description":"## Feature Request\n\n[Describe the desired feature]\n\n## Motivation\n\n[Why is this feature needed? What problem does it solve?]\n\n## Use Cases\n\n1. **Use Case 1**: [description]\n2. **Use Case 2**: [description]\n\n## Proposed Solution\n\n[High-level approach to implementing this feature]\n\n## Alternatives Considered\n\n- **Alternative 1**: [description and why not chosen]\n- **Alternative 2**: [description and why not chosen]\n","design":"## Technical Design\n\n[Detailed technical approach]\n\n## API Changes\n\n[New commands, flags, or APIs]\n\n## Data Model Changes\n\n[Database schema changes if any]\n\n## Implementation Notes\n\n- Note 1\n- Note 2\n\n## Testing Strategy\n\n- Unit tests: [scope]\n- Integration tests: [scope]\n- Manual testing: [steps]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] Feature implements all described use cases\n- [ ] All tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation updated (README, commands)\n- [ ] Examples added if applicable\n- [ ] No performance regressions\n","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:56:41.271215-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:56:41.271215-08:00","labels":["feature"]} +{"id":"bd-1yi5","content_hash":"397d6567112eba6d9401706558576133ef9e85d169e79722e34b0ab16c4cb7f5","title":"Use -short flag in CI for PR checks","description":"Update CI configuration to use -short flag for PR checks, run full tests nightly.\n\nThe slow tests already support testing.Short() and will be skipped.\n\nExpected savings: ~20 seconds for PR checks (fast tests only)\n\nImplementation:\n- Update .github/workflows/ci.yml to add -short flag for PR tests\n- Create/update nightly workflow for full test runs\n- Update README/docs about test strategy\n\nFile: .github/workflows/ci.yml:30","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:17.279618-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:17.279618-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-1yi5","depends_on_id":"bd-l5gq","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:17.280453-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} {"id":"bd-22e0bde9","content_hash":"4c03fb79e67c0948d0d887b56fcbf71ed3b987e4bfd84628d7b9b2fa047a61fa","title":"Add TestNWayCollision for 5+ clones","description":"## Overview\nAdd comprehensive tests for N-way (5+) collision resolution to verify the solution scales beyond 3 clones.\n\n## Purpose\nWhile TestThreeCloneCollision validates the basic N-way case, we need to verify:\n1. Solution scales to arbitrary N\n2. Performance is acceptable with more clones\n3. Convergence time is bounded\n4. No edge cases in larger collision groups\n\n## Implementation Tasks\n\n### 1. Create TestFiveCloneCollision\nFile: beads_twoclone_test.go (or new beads_nway_test.go)\n\n```go\nfunc TestFiveCloneCollision(t *testing.T) {\n // Test with 5 clones creating same ID with different content\n // Verify all 5 clones converge after sync rounds\n \n t.Run(\"SequentialSync\", func(t *testing.T) {\n testNCloneCollision(t, 5, \"A\", \"B\", \"C\", \"D\", \"E\")\n })\n \n t.Run(\"ReverseSync\", func(t *testing.T) {\n testNCloneCollision(t, 5, \"E\", \"D\", \"C\", \"B\", \"A\")\n })\n \n t.Run(\"RandomSync\", func(t *testing.T) {\n testNCloneCollision(t, 5, \"C\", \"A\", \"E\", \"B\", \"D\")\n })\n}\n```\n\n### 2. Implement generalized testNCloneCollision\nGeneralize the 3-clone test to handle arbitrary N:\n\n```go\nfunc testNCloneCollision(t *testing.T, numClones int, syncOrder ...string) {\n t.Helper()\n \n if len(syncOrder) != numClones {\n t.Fatalf(\"syncOrder length (%d) must match numClones (%d)\", \n len(syncOrder), numClones)\n }\n \n tmpDir := t.TempDir()\n \n // Setup remote and N clones\n remoteDir := setupBareRepo(t, tmpDir)\n cloneDirs := make(map[string]string)\n \n for i := 0; i \u003c numClones; i++ {\n name := string(rune('A' + i))\n cloneDirs[name] = setupClone(t, tmpDir, remoteDir, name)\n }\n \n // Each clone creates issue with same ID but different content\n for name, dir := range cloneDirs {\n createIssue(t, dir, fmt.Sprintf(\"Issue from clone %s\", name))\n }\n \n // Sync in specified order\n for _, name := range syncOrder {\n syncClone(t, cloneDirs[name], name)\n }\n \n // Final pull for convergence\n for name, dir := range cloneDirs {\n finalPull(t, dir, name)\n }\n \n // Verify all clones have all N issues\n expectedTitles := make(map[string]bool)\n for i := 0; i \u003c numClones; i++ {\n name := string(rune('A' + i))\n expectedTitles[fmt.Sprintf(\"Issue from clone %s\", name)] = true\n }\n \n for name, dir := range cloneDirs {\n titles := getTitles(t, dir)\n if !compareTitleSets(titles, expectedTitles) {\n t.Errorf(\"Clone %s missing issues: expected %v, got %v\", \n name, expectedTitles, titles)\n }\n }\n \n t.Log(\"✓ All\", numClones, \"clones converged successfully\")\n}\n```\n\n### 3. Add performance benchmarks\nTest convergence time and memory usage:\n\n```go\nfunc BenchmarkNWayCollision(b *testing.B) {\n for _, n := range []int{3, 5, 10, 20} {\n b.Run(fmt.Sprintf(\"N=%d\", n), func(b *testing.B) {\n for i := 0; i \u003c b.N; i++ {\n // Run N-way collision and measure time\n testNCloneCollisionBench(b, n)\n }\n })\n }\n}\n```\n\n### 4. Add convergence time tests\nVerify bounded convergence:\n\n```go\nfunc TestConvergenceTime(t *testing.T) {\n // Test that convergence happens within expected rounds\n // For N clones, should converge in at most N-1 sync rounds\n \n for n := 3; n \u003c= 10; n++ {\n t.Run(fmt.Sprintf(\"N=%d\", n), func(t *testing.T) {\n rounds := measureConvergenceRounds(t, n)\n maxExpected := n - 1\n if rounds \u003e maxExpected {\n t.Errorf(\"Convergence took %d rounds, expected ≤ %d\", \n rounds, maxExpected)\n }\n })\n }\n}\n```\n\n### 5. Add edge case tests\nTest boundary conditions:\n- All N clones have identical content (dedup works)\n- N-1 clones have same content, 1 differs\n- All N clones have unique content\n- Mix of collisions and non-collisions\n\n## Acceptance Criteria\n- TestFiveCloneCollision passes with all sync orders\n- All 5 clones converge to identical content\n- Performance is acceptable (\u003c 5 seconds for 5 clones)\n- Convergence time is bounded (≤ N-1 rounds)\n- Edge cases handled correctly\n- Benchmarks show scalability to 10+ clones\n\n## Files to Create/Modify\n- beads_twoclone_test.go or beads_nway_test.go\n- Add helper functions for N-clone setup\n\n## Testing Strategy\n\n### Test Matrix\n| N Clones | Sync Orders | Expected Result |\n|----------|-------------|-----------------|\n| 3 | A→B→C | Pass |\n| 3 | C→B→A | Pass |\n| 5 | A→B→C→D→E | Pass |\n| 5 | E→D→C→B→A | Pass |\n| 5 | Random | Pass |\n| 10 | Sequential | Pass |\n\n### Performance Targets\n- 3 clones: \u003c 2 seconds\n- 5 clones: \u003c 5 seconds\n- 10 clones: \u003c 15 seconds\n\n## Dependencies\n- Requires bd-cbed9619.5, bd-cbed9619.4, bd-cbed9619.3, bd-cbed9619.2 to be completed\n- TestThreeCloneCollision must pass first\n\n## Success Metrics\n- All tests pass for N ∈ {3, 5, 10}\n- Convergence time scales linearly (O(N))\n- Memory usage reasonable (\u003c 100MB for 10 clones)\n- No data corruption or loss in any scenario","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T23:05:13.974702-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-31T12:00:43.197709-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-31T12:00:43.197709-07:00"} -{"id":"bd-23a8","content_hash":"7c54bea4624429ff0842a192489979e0a1eafdd872027a0934b1a1d9b0e80d33","title":"Test simple issue","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T17:11:04.464726-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T12:08:12.948671-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T12:08:12.948675-08:00"} +{"id":"bd-23a8","content_hash":"7c54bea4624429ff0842a192489979e0a1eafdd872027a0934b1a1d9b0e80d33","title":"Test simple issue","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T17:11:04.464726-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T12:08:12.948671-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T12:08:12.948675-08:00","comments":[{"id":1,"issue_id":"bd-23a8","author":"stevey","text":"Testing the new bd comment alias!","created_at":"2025-11-03T02:41:01Z"},{"id":2,"issue_id":"bd-23a8","author":"stevey","text":"Another test with JSON output","created_at":"2025-11-03T02:41:01Z"},{"id":3,"issue_id":"bd-23a8","author":"stevey","text":"Test comment from file\n","created_at":"2025-11-03T02:41:01Z"}]} {"id":"bd-248bdc3e","content_hash":"8eaeb2dbef1ed6b25fc1bcf3bc5cd1b38a5cf5a487772558ba9fe12a149978f3","title":"Add optional post-merge git hook example for bd sync","description":"Create example git hook that auto-runs bd sync after git pull/merge.\n\nAdd to examples/git-hooks/:\n- post-merge hook that checks if .beads/issues.jsonl changed\n- If changed: run `bd sync` automatically\n- Make it optional/documented (not auto-installed)\n\nBenefits:\n- Zero-friction sync after git pull\n- Complements auto-detection as belt-and-suspenders\n\nNote: post-merge hook already exists for pre-commit/post-merge. Extend it to support sync.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-25T22:47:14.668842-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.218887-07:00"} {"id":"bd-2530","content_hash":"7056a386ee4802bce2b83a981aaac7858b5911938263d212f8f9d1f60bf2a706","title":"Issue with labels","description":"This is a description","design":"Use MVC pattern","acceptance_criteria":"All tests pass","status":"closed","priority":0,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-10-31T21:40:34.630173-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-01T11:11:57.93151-07:00","closed_at":"2025-11-01T11:11:57.93151-07:00","labels":["bug","critical"]} {"id":"bd-2752a7a2","content_hash":"6b2a1aedbdbcb30b98d4a8196801953a1eb22204d63e31954ef9ab6020a7a26b","title":"Create cmd/bd/daemon_watcher.go (~150 LOC)","description":"Implement FileWatcher using fsnotify to watch JSONL file and git refs. Handle platform differences (inotify/FSEvents/ReadDirectoryChangesW). Include edge case handling for file rename, event storm, watcher failure.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T23:05:13.887269-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-31T18:30:24.131535-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-31T18:30:24.131535-07:00"} @@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ {"id":"bd-5f26","content_hash":"75bc96be4d465a5eb39bdf0b636c42cdd7b8ac7daf90b47b7b2a015991b87512","title":"Refactor daemon.go into internal/daemonrunner","description":"Extract daemon runtime from daemon.go (1,565 lines) into internal/daemonrunner with focused modules: config.go, daemon.go, process.go, rpc_server.go, sync.go, git.go. Keep cobra command thin.","design":"New structure:\n- internal/daemonrunner/config.go: Config struct\n- internal/daemonrunner/daemon.go: Daemon struct + Start/Stop\n- internal/daemonrunner/process.go: PID/lock/socket handling\n- internal/daemonrunner/rpc_server.go: RPC lifecycle\n- internal/daemonrunner/sync.go: Export/import/commit/push logic\n- internal/daemonrunner/git.go: Git operations interface\n- cmd/bd/daemon.go: Thin cobra command","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-01T11:41:14.821017-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-01T21:44:44.507747-07:00","closed_at":"2025-11-01T21:44:44.507747-07:00"} {"id":"bd-5f483051","content_hash":"d69f64f7f0bdc46a539dfe0b699a8977309c9c8d59f3e9beffbbe4484275a16b","title":"Implement bd resolve-conflicts (git merge conflicts in JSONL)","description":"Automatically detect and resolve git merge conflicts in .beads/issues.jsonl file.\n\nFeatures:\n- Detect conflict markers in JSONL\n- Parse conflicting issues from HEAD and BASE\n- Provide mechanical resolution (remap duplicate IDs)\n- Support AI-assisted resolution (requires internal/ai package)\n\nSee repair_commands.md lines 125-353 for design.","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T19:37:55.722827-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.179718-07:00"} {"id":"bd-5iv","content_hash":"9260ad77a2fcc64520aa97f156bbf9d868d855b7a3b8491256b316f2563ca958","title":"Test Epic","description":"## Overview\n\n[Describe the high-level goal and scope of this epic]\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- [ ] Criteria 1\n- [ ] Criteria 2\n- [ ] Criteria 3\n\n## Background\n\n[Provide context and motivation]\n\n## Scope\n\n**In Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n\n**Out of Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n","design":"## Architecture\n\n[Describe the overall architecture and approach]\n\n## Components\n\n- Component 1: [description]\n- Component 2: [description]\n\n## Dependencies\n\n[List external dependencies or constraints]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] All child issues are completed\n- [ ] Integration tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation is updated\n- [ ] Code review completed\n","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:03.864229-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:03.864229-08:00","labels":["epic"]} -{"id":"bd-6049","content_hash":"16c54bc547f4ab180aee39efbb197709a47a39047f5bc2dd59e6e6b57ca8bc87","title":"bd doctor --json flag not working","description":"The --json flag on bd doctor command doesn't produce JSON output. It continues to show human-readable output instead. The flag is registered locally on doctorCmd but the code uses the global jsonOutput variable set by PersistentPreRun. Need to investigate why the flag isn't being honored.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-02T17:08:18.170428-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T18:41:01.376783-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-02T18:41:01.376786-08:00"} +{"id":"bd-6049","content_hash":"16c54bc547f4ab180aee39efbb197709a47a39047f5bc2dd59e6e6b57ca8bc87","title":"bd doctor --json flag not working","description":"The --json flag on bd doctor command doesn't produce JSON output. It continues to show human-readable output instead. The flag is registered locally on doctorCmd but the code uses the global jsonOutput variable set by PersistentPreRun. Need to investigate why the flag isn't being honored.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-02T17:08:18.170428-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T18:41:01.376783-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-02T18:41:01.376786-08:00","comments":[{"id":4,"issue_id":"bd-6049","author":"stevey","text":"Fixed by removing the local --json flag definition in doctor.go that was shadowing the persistent --json flag from main.go. The doctor command now correctly uses the global jsonOutput variable.","created_at":"2025-11-03T02:41:01Z"}]} {"id":"bd-6214875c","content_hash":"d4d20e71bbf5c08f1fe1ed07f67b7554167aa165d4972ea51b5cacc1b256c4c1","title":"Split internal/rpc/server.go into focused modules","description":"The file `internal/rpc/server.go` is 2,273 lines with 50+ methods, making it difficult to navigate and prone to merge conflicts. Split into 8 focused files with clear responsibilities.\n\nCurrent structure: Single 2,273-line file with:\n- Connection handling\n- Request routing\n- All 40+ RPC method implementations\n- Storage caching\n- Health checks \u0026 metrics\n- Cleanup loops\n\nTarget structure:\n```\ninternal/rpc/\n├── server.go # Core server, connection handling (~300 lines)\n├── methods_issue.go # Issue operations (~400 lines)\n├── methods_deps.go # Dependency operations (~200 lines)\n├── methods_labels.go # Label operations (~150 lines)\n├── methods_ready.go # Ready work queries (~150 lines)\n├── methods_compact.go # Compaction operations (~200 lines)\n├── methods_comments.go # Comment operations (~150 lines)\n├── storage_cache.go # Storage caching logic (~300 lines)\n└── health.go # Health \u0026 metrics (~200 lines)\n```\n\nMigration strategy:\n1. Create new files with appropriate methods\n2. Keep `server.go` as main file with core server logic\n3. Test incrementally after each file split\n4. Final verification with full test suite","acceptance_criteria":"- All 50 methods split into appropriate files\n- Each file \u003c500 LOC\n- All methods remain on `*Server` receiver (no behavior change)\n- All tests pass: `go test ./internal/rpc/...`\n- Verify daemon works: start daemon, run operations, check health\n- Update internal documentation if needed\n- No change to public API","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T14:21:37.51524-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.2179-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-28T14:11:04.399811-07:00"} {"id":"bd-6221bdcd","content_hash":"3bf15bc9e418180e1e91691261817c872330e182dbc1bcb756522faa42416667","title":"Improve cmd/bd test coverage (currently 20.2%)","description":"CLI commands need better test coverage. Focus on:\n- Command argument parsing\n- Error handling paths\n- Edge cases in create, update, close commands\n- Daemon commands\n- Import/export workflows","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T14:06:27.951656-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.185819-07:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-6221bdcd","depends_on_id":"bd-4d7fca8a","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-10-29T19:52:05.532391-07:00","created_by":"import-remap"}]} {"id":"bd-627d","content_hash":"5b3d3d69ceac28dcbfbc2c7ea2f7a6ff2a3a02bc58ce02dcf6b05f8469e8bddc","title":"AI-supervised database migrations for safer schema evolution","description":"## Problem\n\nDatabase migrations can lose user data through edge cases that are hard to anticipate (e.g., GH #201 where bd migrate failed to set issue_prefix, or bd-d355a07d false positive data loss warnings). Since beads is designed to be run by AI agents, we should leverage AI to make migrations safer.\n\n## Current State\n\nMigrations run blindly with:\n- No pre-flight validation\n- No data integrity verification\n- No rollback on failure\n- Limited post-migration testing\n\nRecent issues:\n- GH #201: Migration didn't set issue_prefix config, breaking commands\n- bd-d355a07d: False positive \"data loss\" warnings on collision resolution\n- Users reported migration data loss (fixed but broader problem remains)\n\n## Proposal: AI-Supervised Migration Framework\n\nUse AI to supervise migrations through structured verification:\n\n### 1. Pre-Migration Analysis\n- AI reads migration code and current schema\n- Identifies potential data loss scenarios\n- Generates validation queries to verify assumptions\n- Creates snapshot queries for before/after comparison\n\n### 2. Migration Execution\n- Take database backup/snapshot\n- Run validation queries (pre-state)\n- Execute migration in transaction\n- Run validation queries (post-state)\n\n### 3. Post-Migration Verification\n- AI compares pre/post snapshots\n- Verifies data integrity invariants\n- Checks for unexpected data loss\n- Validates config completeness (like issue_prefix)\n\n### 4. Rollback on Anomalies\n- If AI detects data loss, rollback transaction\n- Present human-readable error report\n- Suggest fix before retrying\n\n## Example Flow\n\n```\n$ bd migrate\n\n→ Analyzing migration plan...\n→ AI identified 3 potential data loss scenarios\n→ Generating validation queries...\n→ Creating pre-migration snapshot...\n→ Running migration in transaction...\n→ Verifying post-migration state...\n✓ All 247 issues accounted for\n✓ Config table complete (issue_prefix: \"mcp\")\n✓ Dependencies intact (342 relationships verified)\n→ Migration successful!\n```\n\nIf something goes wrong:\n```\n$ bd migrate\n\n→ Analyzing migration plan...\n→ AI identified issue: Missing issue_prefix config after migration\n→ Recommendation: Add prefix detection step\n→ Aborting migration - database unchanged\n```\n\n## Implementation Ideas\n\n### A. Migration Validator Tool\nCreate `bd migrate --validate` that:\n- Simulates migration on copy of database\n- Uses AI to verify data integrity\n- Reports potential issues before real migration\n\n### B. Migration Test Generator\nAI generates test cases for migrations:\n- Edge cases (empty DB, large DB, missing config)\n- Data integrity checks\n- Regression tests\n\n### C. Migration Invariants\nDefine invariants that AI checks:\n- Issue count should not decrease (unless collision resolution)\n- All required config keys present\n- Foreign key relationships intact\n- No orphaned dependencies\n\n### D. Self-Healing Migrations\nAI detects incomplete migrations and suggests fixes:\n- Missing config values (like GH #201)\n- Orphaned data\n- Index inconsistencies\n\n## Benefits\n\n1. **Catch edge cases**: AI explores scenarios humans miss\n2. **Self-documenting**: AI explains what migration does\n3. **Agent-friendly**: Agents can run migrations confidently\n4. **Fewer rollbacks**: Detect issues before committing\n5. **Better testing**: AI generates comprehensive test suites\n\n## Open Questions\n\n1. Which AI model? (Fast: Haiku, Thorough: Sonnet/GPT-4)\n2. How to balance safety vs migration speed?\n3. Should AI validation be required or optional?\n4. How to handle offline scenarios (no API access)?\n5. What invariants should always be checked?\n\n## Related Work\n\n- bd-b245: Migration registry (makes migrations introspectable)\n- GH #201: issue_prefix migration bug (motivating example)\n- bd-d355a07d: False positive data loss warnings","design":"## Architecture: Agent-Supervised Migrations (Inversion of Control)\n\n**Key principle:** Beads provides observability and validation primitives. AI agents supervise using their own reasoning. Beads NEVER makes AI API calls.\n\n## Phase 1: Migration Invariants (Pure Validation)\n\nCreate `internal/storage/sqlite/migration_invariants.go`:\n\n```go\ntype MigrationInvariant struct {\n Name string\n Description string\n Check func(*sql.DB, *Snapshot) error\n}\n\ntype Snapshot struct {\n IssueCount int\n ConfigKeys []string\n DependencyCount int\n LabelCount int\n}\n\nvar invariants = []MigrationInvariant{\n {\n Name: \"required_config_present\",\n Description: \"Required config keys must exist\",\n Check: checkRequiredConfig, // Would have caught GH #201\n },\n {\n Name: \"foreign_keys_valid\",\n Description: \"No orphaned dependencies or labels\",\n Check: checkForeignKeys,\n },\n {\n Name: \"issue_count_stable\",\n Description: \"Issue count should not decrease unexpectedly\",\n Check: checkIssueCount,\n },\n}\n\nfunc checkRequiredConfig(db *sql.DB, snapshot *Snapshot) error {\n required := []string{\"issue_prefix\", \"schema_version\"}\n for _, key := range required {\n var value string\n err := db.QueryRow(\"SELECT value FROM config WHERE key = ?\", key).Scan(\u0026value)\n if err != nil || value == \"\" {\n return fmt.Errorf(\"required config key missing: %s\", key)\n }\n }\n return nil\n}\n```\n\n## Phase 2: Dry-Run \u0026 Inspection Tools\n\nAdd `bd migrate --dry-run --json`:\n\n```json\n{\n \"pending_migrations\": [\n {\"name\": \"dirty_issues_table\", \"description\": \"Adds dirty_issues table\"},\n {\"name\": \"content_hash_column\", \"description\": \"Adds content_hash for collision resolution\"}\n ],\n \"current_state\": {\n \"schema_version\": \"0.9.9\",\n \"issue_count\": 247,\n \"config\": {\"schema_version\": \"0.9.9\"},\n \"missing_config\": [\"issue_prefix\"]\n },\n \"warnings\": [\n \"issue_prefix config not set - may break commands after migration\"\n ],\n \"invariants_to_check\": [\n \"required_config_present\",\n \"foreign_keys_valid\",\n \"issue_count_stable\"\n ]\n}\n```\n\nAdd `bd info --schema --json`:\n\n```json\n{\n \"tables\": [\"issues\", \"dependencies\", \"labels\", \"config\"],\n \"schema_version\": \"0.9.9\",\n \"config\": {},\n \"sample_issue_ids\": [\"mcp-1\", \"mcp-2\"],\n \"detected_prefix\": \"mcp\"\n}\n```\n\n## Phase 3: Pre/Post Snapshots with Rollback\n\nUpdate `RunMigrations()`:\n\n```go\nfunc RunMigrations(db *sql.DB) error {\n // Capture pre-migration snapshot\n snapshot := captureSnapshot(db)\n \n // Run migrations in transaction\n tx, err := db.Begin()\n if err != nil {\n return err\n }\n defer tx.Rollback()\n \n for _, migration := range migrations {\n if err := migration.Func(tx); err != nil {\n return fmt.Errorf(\"migration %s failed: %w\", migration.Name, err)\n }\n }\n \n // Verify invariants before commit\n if err := verifyInvariants(tx, snapshot); err != nil {\n return fmt.Errorf(\"post-migration validation failed (rolled back): %w\", err)\n }\n \n return tx.Commit()\n}\n```\n\n## Phase 4: MCP Tools for Agent Supervision\n\nAdd to beads-mcp:\n\n```python\n@server.tool()\nasync def inspect_migration(workspace_root: str) -\u003e dict:\n \"\"\"Get migration plan and current state for agent analysis.\n \n Agent should:\n 1. Review pending migrations\n 2. Check for warnings (missing config, etc.)\n 3. Verify invariants will pass\n 4. Decide whether to run bd migrate\n \"\"\"\n result = run_bd([\"migrate\", \"--dry-run\", \"--json\"], workspace_root)\n return json.loads(result.stdout)\n\n@server.tool() \nasync def get_schema_info(workspace_root: str) -\u003e dict:\n \"\"\"Get current database schema for migration analysis.\"\"\"\n result = run_bd([\"info\", \"--schema\", \"--json\"], workspace_root)\n return json.loads(result.stdout)\n```\n\n## Agent Workflow Example\n\n```python\n# Agent detects user wants to migrate\nmigration_plan = inspect_migration(\"/path/to/workspace\")\n\n# Agent analyzes (using its own reasoning, no API calls from beads)\nif \"issue_prefix\" in migration_plan[\"missing_config\"]:\n schema = get_schema_info(\"/path/to/workspace\")\n detected_prefix = schema[\"detected_prefix\"]\n \n # Agent fixes issue before migration\n run_bd([\"config\", \"set\", \"issue_prefix\", detected_prefix])\n \n# Now safe to migrate\nrun_bd([\"migrate\"])\n```\n\n## What Beads Provides\n\n✅ Deterministic validation (invariants)\n✅ Structured inspection (--dry-run, --explain)\n✅ Rollback on invariant failure\n✅ JSON output for agent parsing\n\n## What Beads Does NOT Do\n\n❌ No AI API calls\n❌ No external model access\n❌ No agent invocation\n\nAgents supervise migrations using their own reasoning and the inspection tools beads provides.","acceptance_criteria":"Phase 1: Migration invariants implemented and tested, checked after every migration, clear error messages when invariants fail.\n\nPhase 2: Snapshot capture before migrations, comparison after, rollback on verification failure.\n\nPhase 3 (stretch): AI validation optional flag implemented, AI can analyze migration code and generate custom validation queries.\n\nPhase 4 (stretch): Migration test fixtures created, all fixtures pass migrations, CI runs migration tests.","notes":"## Progress\n\n### ✅ Phase 1: Migration Invariants (COMPLETED)\n\n**Implemented:**\n- Created internal/storage/sqlite/migration_invariants.go with 3 invariants\n- Updated RunMigrations() to verify invariants after migrations\n- All tests pass ✓\n\n### ✅ Phase 2: Inspection Tools (COMPLETED \u0026 PUSHED)\n\n**Commit:** 1abe4e7 - \"Add migration inspection tools for AI agents (bd-627d Phase 2)\"\n\n**Implemented:**\n1. ✅ bd migrate --inspect --json - Shows migration plan\n2. ✅ bd info --schema --json - Returns schema details\n3. ✅ Migration warnings system\n4. ✅ Documentation updated in AGENTS.md\n5. ✅ All tests pass\n\n### ✅ Phase 3: MCP Tools (COMPLETED \u0026 PUSHED)\n\n**Commit:** 2493693 - \"Add MCP tools for migration inspection (bd-627d Phase 3)\"\n\n**Implemented:**\n1. ✅ inspect_migration(workspace_root) tool in beads-mcp\n2. ✅ get_schema_info(workspace_root) tool in beads-mcp\n3. ✅ Abstract methods in BdClientBase\n4. ✅ CLI client implementations\n5. ✅ All tests pass\n\n**All phases complete!** Migration inspection fully integrated into MCP server.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-02T12:57:10.722048-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T14:31:25.095296-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-02T14:31:25.095308-08:00"} @@ -117,6 +118,7 @@ {"id":"bd-6c68","content_hash":"ead791a2102d6b2fc200d751f71241404d130ebe6ab7df66af7168f3d6f42327","title":"bd info shows 'auto_start_disabled' even when daemon is crashed/missing","description":"","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-10-31T21:08:03.385681-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-01T19:13:43.819004-07:00","closed_at":"2025-11-01T19:13:43.819004-07:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-6c68","depends_on_id":"bd-2752a7a2","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-10-31T21:08:03.387045-07:00","created_by":"stevey"}]} {"id":"bd-6d7efe32","content_hash":"40b55f82509b9642dfa4a71a749e39183024f5a6347ffdc3bc49050e5279058a","title":"CRDT-based architecture for guaranteed convergence (v2.0)","description":"## Vision\nRedesign beads around Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs) to provide mathematical guarantees for N-way collision resolution at arbitrary scale.\n\n## Current Limitations\n- Content-hash based collision resolution fails at 5+ clones\n- Non-deterministic convergence in multi-round scenarios\n- UNIQUE constraint violations during rename operations\n- No formal proof of convergence properties\n\n## CRDT Benefits\n- Provably convergent (Strong Eventual Consistency)\n- Commutative/Associative/Idempotent operations\n- No coordination required between clones\n- Scales to 100+ concurrent workers\n- Well-understood mathematical foundations\n\n## Proposed Architecture\n\n### 1. UUID-Based IDs\nReplace sequential IDs with UUIDs:\n- Current: bd-1c63eb84, bd-9063acda, bd-4d80b7b1\n- CRDT: bd-a1b2c3d4-e5f6-7890-abcd-ef1234567890\n- Human aliases maintained separately: #42 maps to UUID\n\n### 2. Last-Write-Wins (LWW) Elements\nEach field becomes an LWW register:\n- title: (timestamp, clone_id, value)\n- status: (timestamp, clone_id, value)\n- Deterministic conflict resolution via Lamport timestamp + clone_id tiebreaker\n\n### 3. Operation Log\nTrack all operations as CRDT ops:\n- CREATE(uuid, timestamp, clone_id, fields)\n- UPDATE(uuid, field, timestamp, clone_id, value)\n- DELETE(uuid, timestamp, clone_id) - tombstone, not hard delete\n\n### 4. Sync as Merge\nSyncing becomes merging two CRDT states:\n- No merge conflicts possible\n- Deterministic merge function\n- Guaranteed convergence\n\n## Implementation Phases\n\n### Phase 1: Research \u0026 Design (4 weeks)\n- Study existing CRDT implementations (Automerge, Yjs, Loro)\n- Design schema for CRDT-based issue tracking\n- Prototype LWW-based Issue CRDT\n- Benchmark performance vs current system\n\n### Phase 2: Parallel Implementation (6 weeks)\n- Implement CRDT storage layer alongside SQLite\n- Build conversion tools: SQLite ↔ CRDT\n- Maintain backward compatibility with v1.x format\n- Migration path for existing databases\n\n### Phase 3: Testing \u0026 Validation (4 weeks)\n- Formal verification of convergence properties\n- Stress testing with 100+ clone scenario\n- Performance profiling and optimization\n- Documentation and examples\n\n### Phase 4: Migration \u0026 Rollout (4 weeks)\n- Release v2.0-beta with CRDT backend\n- Gradual migration from v1.x\n- Monitoring and bug fixes\n- Final v2.0 release\n\n## Risks \u0026 Mitigations\n\n**Risk 1: Performance overhead**\n- Mitigation: Benchmark early, optimize hot paths\n- CRDTs can be slower than append-only logs\n- May need compaction strategy\n\n**Risk 2: Storage bloat**\n- Mitigation: Implement operation log compaction\n- Tombstone garbage collection for deleted issues\n- Periodic snapshots to reduce log size\n\n**Risk 3: Breaking changes**\n- Mitigation: Maintain v1.x compatibility layer\n- Gradual migration tools\n- Dual-mode operation during transition\n\n**Risk 4: Complexity**\n- Mitigation: Use battle-tested CRDT libraries\n- Comprehensive documentation\n- Clear migration guide\n\n## Success Criteria\n- 100-clone collision test passes without failures\n- Formal proof of convergence properties\n- Performance within 2x of current system\n- Zero manual conflict resolution required\n- Backward compatible with v1.x databases\n\n## Timeline\n18-20 weeks total (4-5 months)\n\n## References\n- Automerge: https://automerge.org\n- Yjs: https://docs.yjs.dev\n- Loro: https://loro.dev\n- CRDT theory: Shapiro et al, A comprehensive study of CRDTs\n- Related issues: bd-e6d71828, bd-7a2b58fc, bd-81abb639","status":"closed","priority":3,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-10-29T20:48:00.267237-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-31T20:06:44.604643-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-31T20:06:44.604643-07:00"} {"id":"bd-6fe4622f","content_hash":"d0d8e0634aea5e60373d339b363d7601af5d42d0f90780a54a4978c3e39ca747","title":"Remove unreachable utility functions","description":"Several small utility functions are unreachable:\n\nFiles to clean:\n1. `internal/storage/sqlite/hash.go` - `computeIssueContentHash` (line 17)\n - Check if entire file can be deleted if only contains this function\n\n2. `internal/config/config.go` - `FileUsed` (line 151)\n - Delete unused config helper\n\n3. `cmd/bd/git_sync_test.go` - `verifyIssueOpen` (line 300)\n - Delete dead test helper\n\n4. `internal/compact/haiku.go` - `HaikuClient.SummarizeTier2` (line 81)\n - Tier 2 summarization not implemented\n - Options: implement feature OR delete method\n\nImpact: Removes 50-100 LOC depending on decisions","acceptance_criteria":"- Remove unreachable functions\n- If entire files can be deleted (like hash.go), delete them\n- For SummarizeTier2: decide to implement or delete, document decision\n- All tests pass: `go test ./...`\n- Verify no callers exist for each function","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.434573-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.224957-07:00"} +{"id":"bd-6mjj","content_hash":"8a32d3005cdfd35e47c94c0b0a4e240069edfc63213b57dad37dc604dfb9695e","title":"Split test suites: fast vs. integration","description":"Reorganize tests into separate packages/files for fast unit tests vs slow integration tests.\n\nBenefits:\n- Clear separation of concerns\n- Easier to run just fast tests during development\n- Can parallelize CI jobs better\n\nFiles to organize:\n- beads_hash_multiclone_test.go (slow integration tests)\n- beads_integration_test.go (medium-speed integration tests)\n- Other test files (fast unit tests)","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:21.040347-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:21.040347-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-6mjj","depends_on_id":"bd-l5gq","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:21.041228-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} {"id":"bd-70419816","content_hash":"1ee07b713143f1abcc3c8189ae49a41e34669822a1843fe1ca823c5f69af4494","title":"Export deduplication breaks when JSONL and export_hashes table diverge","description":"## Problem\n\nThe export deduplication feature (timestamp-only skipping) breaks when the JSONL file and export_hashes table get out of sync, causing exports to skip issues that aren't actually in the file.\n\n## Symptoms\n\n- `bd export` reports \"Skipped 128 issue(s) with timestamp-only changes\"\n- JSONL file only has 38 lines but DB has 149 issues\n- export_hashes table has 149 entries\n- Auto-import doesn't trigger (hash matches despite missing data)\n- Two repos on same commit show different issue counts\n\n## Root Cause\n\nshouldSkipExport() in autoflush.go compares current issue hash with stored export_hashes entry. If they match, it skips export assuming the issue is already in the JSONL.\n\nThis assumption fails when:\n1. Git operations (pull, reset, checkout) change JSONL without clearing export_hashes\n2. Manual JSONL edits or corruption\n3. Import operations that modify DB but don't update export_hashes\n4. Partial exports that update export_hashes but don't complete\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Critical data loss risk**: Issues appear to be tracked but aren't persisted to git\n- Breaks multi-repo sync (root cause of today's debugging session)\n- Auto-import fails to detect staleness (hash matches despite missing data)\n- Silent data corruption (no error messages, just missing issues)\n\n## Reproduction\n\n1. Have DB with 149 issues, all in export_hashes table\n2. Truncate JSONL to 38 lines (simulate git reset or corruption)\n3. Run `bd export` - it skips 128 issues\n4. JSONL still has only 38 lines but export thinks it succeeded\n\n## Current Workaround\n\n```bash\nsqlite3 .beads/beads.db \"DELETE FROM export_hashes\"\nbd export -o .beads/beads.jsonl\n```\n\n## Proposed Solutions\n\n**Option 1: Verify JSONL integrity before skipping**\n- Count lines in JSONL, compare with export_hashes count\n- If mismatch, clear export_hashes and force full export\n- Safe but adds I/O overhead\n\n**Option 2: Hash-based JSONL validation**\n- Store hash of entire JSONL file in metadata\n- Before export, check if JSONL hash matches\n- If mismatch, clear export_hashes\n- More efficient, detects any JSONL corruption\n\n**Option 3: Disable timestamp-only deduplication**\n- Remove the feature entirely\n- Always export all issues\n- Simplest and safest, but creates larger git commits\n\n**Option 4: Clear export_hashes on git operations**\n- Add post-merge hook to clear export_hashes\n- Clear on any import operation\n- Defensive approach but may over-clear\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nCombination of Options 2 + 4:\n1. Store JSONL file hash in metadata after export\n2. Check hash before export, clear export_hashes if mismatch \n3. Clear export_hashes on import operations\n4. Add `bd validate` check for JSONL/export_hashes sync\n\n## Files Involved\n\n- cmd/bd/autoflush.go (shouldSkipExport)\n- cmd/bd/export.go (export with deduplication)\n- internal/storage/sqlite/metadata.go (export_hashes table)","status":"closed","priority":0,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-10-29T23:05:13.960352-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.19679-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-29T22:22:20.406934-07:00"} {"id":"bd-710a4916","content_hash":"3d8be03f83f87067b1aaf295b0b829d20890e47686e0da10ef81d2096f5ca974","title":"CRDT-based architecture for guaranteed convergence (v2.0)","description":"## Vision\nRedesign beads around Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs) to provide mathematical guarantees for N-way collision resolution at arbitrary scale.\n\n## Current Limitations\n- Content-hash based collision resolution fails at 5+ clones\n- Non-deterministic convergence in multi-round scenarios\n- UNIQUE constraint violations during rename operations\n- No formal proof of convergence properties\n\n## CRDT Benefits\n- Provably convergent (Strong Eventual Consistency)\n- Commutative/Associative/Idempotent operations\n- No coordination required between clones\n- Scales to 100+ concurrent workers\n- Well-understood mathematical foundations\n\n## Proposed Architecture\n\n### 1. UUID-Based IDs\nReplace sequential IDs with UUIDs:\n- Current: bd-1c63eb84, bd-9063acda, bd-4d80b7b1\n- CRDT: bd-a1b2c3d4-e5f6-7890-abcd-ef1234567890\n- Human aliases maintained separately: #42 maps to UUID\n\n### 2. Last-Write-Wins (LWW) Elements\nEach field becomes an LWW register:\n- title: (timestamp, clone_id, value)\n- status: (timestamp, clone_id, value)\n- Deterministic conflict resolution via Lamport timestamp + clone_id tiebreaker\n\n### 3. Operation Log\nTrack all operations as CRDT ops:\n- CREATE(uuid, timestamp, clone_id, fields)\n- UPDATE(uuid, field, timestamp, clone_id, value)\n- DELETE(uuid, timestamp, clone_id) - tombstone, not hard delete\n\n### 4. Sync as Merge\nSyncing becomes merging two CRDT states:\n- No merge conflicts possible\n- Deterministic merge function\n- Guaranteed convergence\n\n## Implementation Phases\n\n### Phase 1: Research \u0026 Design (4 weeks)\n- Study existing CRDT implementations (Automerge, Yjs, Loro)\n- Design schema for CRDT-based issue tracking\n- Prototype LWW-based Issue CRDT\n- Benchmark performance vs current system\n\n### Phase 2: Parallel Implementation (6 weeks)\n- Implement CRDT storage layer alongside SQLite\n- Build conversion tools: SQLite ↔ CRDT\n- Maintain backward compatibility with v1.x format\n- Migration path for existing databases\n\n### Phase 3: Testing \u0026 Validation (4 weeks)\n- Formal verification of convergence properties\n- Stress testing with 100+ clone scenario\n- Performance profiling and optimization\n- Documentation and examples\n\n### Phase 4: Migration \u0026 Rollout (4 weeks)\n- Release v2.0-beta with CRDT backend\n- Gradual migration from v1.x\n- Monitoring and bug fixes\n- Final v2.0 release\n\n## Risks \u0026 Mitigations\n\n**Risk 1: Performance overhead**\n- Mitigation: Benchmark early, optimize hot paths\n- CRDTs can be slower than append-only logs\n- May need compaction strategy\n\n**Risk 2: Storage bloat**\n- Mitigation: Implement operation log compaction\n- Tombstone garbage collection for deleted issues\n- Periodic snapshots to reduce log size\n\n**Risk 3: Breaking changes**\n- Mitigation: Maintain v1.x compatibility layer\n- Gradual migration tools\n- Dual-mode operation during transition\n\n**Risk 4: Complexity**\n- Mitigation: Use battle-tested CRDT libraries\n- Comprehensive documentation\n- Clear migration guide\n\n## Success Criteria\n- 100-clone collision test passes without failures\n- Formal proof of convergence properties\n- Performance within 2x of current system\n- Zero manual conflict resolution required\n- Backward compatible with v1.x databases\n\n## Timeline\n18-20 weeks total (4-5 months)\n\n## References\n- Automerge: https://automerge.org\n- Yjs: https://docs.yjs.dev\n- Loro: https://loro.dev\n- CRDT theory: Shapiro et al, A comprehensive study of CRDTs\n- Related issues: bd-e6d71828, bd-7a2b58fc,-1","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-10-29T10:23:57.978339-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.182513-07:00"} {"id":"bd-71107098","content_hash":"9feb9a8dc8ae2dc65b11edeff37cf5ce48d8f28e1ced45d64ac0176937610296","title":"Make two-clone workflow actually work (no hacks)","description":"TestTwoCloneCollision proves beads CANNOT handle two independent clones filing issues simultaneously. This is the basic collaborative workflow and it must work cleanly.\n\nTest location: beads_twoclone_test.go\n\nThe test creates two git clones, both file issues with same ID (test-1), --resolve-collisions remaps clone B's to test-2, but after sync:\n- Clone A has test-1=\"Issue from clone A\", test-2=\"Issue from clone B\" \n- Clone B has test-1=\"Issue from clone B\", test-2=\"Issue from clone A\"\n\nThe TITLES are swapped! Both clones have 2 issues but with opposite title assignments.\n\nWe've tried many fixes (per-project daemons, auto-sync, lamport hashing, precommit hooks) but nothing has made the test pass.\n\nGoal: Make the test pass WITHOUT hacks. The two clones should converge to identical state after sync.","acceptance_criteria":"1. TestTwoCloneCollision passes without EXPECTED FAILURE\n2. Both clones converge to identical issue database\n3. No manual conflict resolution required\n4. Git status clean in both clones\n5. bd ready output identical in both clones","notes":"**Major progress achieved!** The two-clone workflow now converges correctly.\n\n**What was fixed:**\n--3d844c58: Implemented content-hash based rename detection\n- bd-64c05d00.1: Fixed test to compare content not timestamps\n- Both clones now converge to identical issue databases\n- test-1 and test-2 have correct titles in both clones\n- No more title swapping!\n\n**Current status (VERIFIED):**\n✅ Acceptance criteria 1: TestTwoCloneCollision passes (confirmed Oct 28)\n✅ Acceptance criteria 2: Both clones converge to identical issue database (content matches)\n✅ Acceptance criteria 3: No manual conflict resolution required (automatic)\n✅ Acceptance criteria 4: Git status clean\n✅ Acceptance criteria 5: bd ready output identical (timestamps are expected difference)\n\n**ALL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA MET!** This issue is complete and can be closed.","status":"closed","priority":0,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-10-28T16:34:53.278793-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-31T19:38:09.206303-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-28T19:20:04.143242-07:00"} @@ -138,6 +140,7 @@ {"id":"bd-7e7ddffa.1","content_hash":"df6de1f6a58a995d979a7be59c2fb38800e81b96e8fa0bd39980f8bf9f1a4f37","title":"bd resolve-conflicts - Git merge conflict resolver","description":"Automatically resolve JSONL merge conflicts.\n\nModes:\n- Mechanical: ID remapping (no AI)\n- AI-assisted: Smart merge/keep decisions\n- Interactive: Review each conflict\n\nHandles \u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c conflict markers in .beads/beads.jsonl\n\nFiles: cmd/bd/resolve_conflicts.go (new)","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T14:48:30.083642-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.220145-07:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-7e7ddffa.1","depends_on_id":"bd-7e7ddffa","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-10-29T19:58:28.847736-07:00","created_by":"stevey"}]} {"id":"bd-7eed","content_hash":"f491845894c23d141399b422109c45015fe725b2d5c27bd68484d2306fcf55dd","title":"Remove obsolete stale.go command (executor tables never implemented)","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"chore","created_at":"2025-10-31T21:27:05.555369-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-31T21:27:11.427631-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-31T21:27:11.427631-07:00"} {"id":"bd-7fe8","content_hash":"a404fb9747111bc7091d24ebdcc0bb98ceda0c8833390f2e519fa17cb068f5ed","title":"Fix linting error in migrate.go","description":"Linter reports error:\n```\ncmd/bd/migrate.go:647:37: cleanupWALFiles - result 0 (error) is always nil (unparam)\n```\n\nThe `cleanupWALFiles` function always returns nil, so the error return type should be removed or the function should actually return errors when appropriate.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"chore","created_at":"2025-11-02T09:29:37.279747-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T09:46:52.18793-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-02T09:46:52.18793-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-7fe8","depends_on_id":"bd-1231","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-02T09:29:37.280881-08:00","created_by":"stevey"}]} +{"id":"bd-7kua","content_hash":"c890252a1f747219426d971637ea40f2708cea3f3df79c20960d126d58a5a8fe","title":"Reduce sync rounds in multiclone tests","description":"Analyze and reduce the number of sync rounds in hash multiclone tests.\n\nCurrent state:\n- TestHashIDs_MultiCloneConverge: 1 round of syncs across 3 clones\n- TestHashIDs_IdenticalContentDedup: 2 rounds across 2 clones\n\nInvestigation needed:\n- Profile to see how much time each sync takes\n- Determine minimum rounds needed for convergence\n- Consider making rounds configurable via env var\n\nFile: beads_hash_multiclone_test.go:70, :132","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:18.405038-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:18.405038-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-7kua","depends_on_id":"bd-l5gq","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:18.405883-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} {"id":"bd-81abb639","content_hash":"5af6696b1bbfc76056771aa71ac6f72aaadb72e3fb139c09eb7680b86c9053c8","title":"Investigate jujutsu VCS as potential solution for conflict-free merging","description":"## Context\nCurrent N-way collision resolution struggles with Git line-based merge model. When 5+ clones create issues with same ID, Git merge conflicts require manual resolution, and our collision resolver can fail during convergence rounds.\n\n## Research Question\nCould jujutsu (jj) provide better conflict handling for JSONL files?\n\n## Jujutsu Overview\n- Next-gen VCS built on libgit2\n- Designed to handle conflicts as first-class citizens\n- Supports conflict-free replicated data types (CRDTs) in some scenarios\n- Better handling of concurrent edits\n- Can work with Git repos (compatible with existing infrastructure)\n\n## Investigation Tasks\n1. JSONL Merge Behavior - How does jj handle line-by-line JSONL conflicts?\n2. Integration Feasibility - Can beads use jj as backend while maintaining Git compatibility?\n3. Conflict Resolution Model - Does jj conflict model map to our collision resolution?\n4. Operational Transform Support - Does jj implement operational transforms?\n\n## Deliverables\n1. Technical report on jj merge algorithm for JSONL\n2. Proof-of-concept: 5-clone collision test using jj instead of Git\n3. Performance comparison: Git vs jj for beads workload\n4. Recommendation: Adopt, experiment further, or abandon\n\n## References\n- https://github.com/martinvonz/jj\n- Related to bd-e6d71828, bd-7a2b58fc","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T20:02:47.953008-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.19464-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-29T20:47:52.910985-07:00"} {"id":"bd-824","content_hash":"c6895598595873d74698771b8687ffbd60999120fed85a5c1d7c2176d7d2976f","title":"Add migration guide for library consumers","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md has excellent migration examples for CLI users (lines 508-549) but lacks examples for library consumers like VC that use beadsLib in Go/TypeScript code.\n\nLibrary consumers need to know:\n- Whether their existing code continues to work unchanged (backward compatibility)\n- How config.toml is automatically read (transparent hydration)\n- When and how to use explicit multi-repo configuration\n- What happens if config.toml doesn't exist (defaults)\n\nExample needed:\n```go\n// Before (v0.17.3)\nstore, err := beadsLib.NewSQLiteStorage(\".beads/vc.db\")\n\n// After (v0.18.0 with multi-repo) - still works!\nstore, err := beadsLib.NewSQLiteStorage(\".beads/vc.db\")\n// Automatically reads .beads/config.toml if present\n\n// Explicit multi-repo (if needed)\ncfg := beadsLib.Config{\n Primary: \".beads/vc.db\",\n Additional: []string{\"~/.beads-planning\"},\n}\nstore, err := beadsLib.NewStorageWithConfig(cfg)\n```","acceptance_criteria":"- Section added to contributor-workflow-analysis.md for library consumers\n- Code examples showing backward compatibility\n- Code examples showing explicit multi-repo configuration\n- Guidance on when library consumers should use multi-repo vs single-repo","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:17.748337-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:17.748337-08:00"} {"id":"bd-833559b3","content_hash":"9082c986207b9df7a7a4dc87a53007849e2b9f6e92f3bea41e22d6a14f1f6f42","title":"bd validate - Comprehensive health check","description":"Run all validation checks in one command.\n\nChecks:\n- Duplicates\n- Orphaned dependencies\n- Test pollution\n- Git conflicts\n\nSupports --fix-all for auto-repair.\n\nDepends on bd-cbed9619.1, bd-0dcea000, bd-2752a7a2, bd-9826b69a.\n\nFiles: cmd/bd/validate.go (new)","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T20:02:47.957692-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.219095-07:00"} @@ -145,7 +148,7 @@ {"id":"bd-8534","content_hash":"001e0ffe353115fbbaad39f392208ddd8ceaa515cdbab9f616a85b63b45f0d0e","title":"Switch from modernc.org/sqlite to ncruces/go-sqlite3 for WASM support","description":"modernc.org/sqlite depends on modernc.org/libc which has no js/wasm support (platform-specific syscalls). Need to switch to ncruces/go-sqlite3 which wraps a WASM build of SQLite using wazero runtime.\n\nKey differences:\n- ncruces/go-sqlite3: Uses WASM build of SQLite + wazero runtime\n- modernc.org/sqlite: Pure Go translation, requires libc for syscalls\n\nThis is a prerequisite for bd-62a0 (WASM build infrastructure).","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T22:14:27.627154-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T22:23:49.377223-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-02T22:23:49.377223-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-8534","depends_on_id":"bd-44d0","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-02T22:23:49.555691-08:00","created_by":"stevey"}]} {"id":"bd-85487065","content_hash":"637cbd56af122b175ff060b4df050871fe86124c5d883ba7f8a17f2f95479613","title":"Add tests for internal/autoimport package","description":"Currently 0.0% coverage. Need tests for auto-import functionality that detects and imports updated JSONL files.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T14:06:18.154805-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.182987-07:00"} {"id":"bd-879d","content_hash":"2f291ca2adead5ee3fb7fade39c088165b5467780599f9a719dcaebc87455ae3","title":"Test issue 1","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T09:44:12.538697729Z","updated_at":"2025-11-02T09:45:20.76214671Z","closed_at":"2025-11-02T09:45:20.76214671Z","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-879d","depends_on_id":"bd-d3e5","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-11-02T09:44:22.103468321Z","created_by":"mrdavidlaing"}]} -{"id":"bd-87a0","content_hash":"81caf8d588f32637faa7ad9b38456574e0643be36954ca5e61d3f5d5388387b2","title":"Publish @beads/bd package to npm registry","description":"Publish the npm package to the public npm registry:\n\n## Prerequisites\n- npm account created\n- Organization @beads created (or use different namespace)\n- npm login completed locally\n- Package tested locally (bd-f282 completed)\n\n## Publishing steps\n1. Verify package.json version matches current bd version\n2. Run npm pack and inspect tarball contents\n3. Test installation from tarball one more time\n4. Run npm publish --access public\n5. Verify package appears on https://www.npmjs.com/package/@beads/bd\n6. Test installation from registry: npm install -g @beads/bd\n\n## Post-publish\n- Add npm badge to README.md\n- Update CHANGELOG.md with npm package release\n- Announce in release notes\n\n## Note\n- May need to choose different name if @beads namespace unavailable\n- Alternative: beads-cli, bd-cli, or unscoped beads-issue-tracker","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T23:40:25.263569-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T10:39:41.772338-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T10:39:41.772338-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-87a0","depends_on_id":"bd-febc","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-02T23:40:33.014043-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} +{"id":"bd-87a0","content_hash":"81caf8d588f32637faa7ad9b38456574e0643be36954ca5e61d3f5d5388387b2","title":"Publish @beads/bd package to npm registry","description":"Publish the npm package to the public npm registry:\n\n## Prerequisites\n- npm account created\n- Organization @beads created (or use different namespace)\n- npm login completed locally\n- Package tested locally (bd-f282 completed)\n\n## Publishing steps\n1. Verify package.json version matches current bd version\n2. Run npm pack and inspect tarball contents\n3. Test installation from tarball one more time\n4. Run npm publish --access public\n5. Verify package appears on https://www.npmjs.com/package/@beads/bd\n6. Test installation from registry: npm install -g @beads/bd\n\n## Post-publish\n- Add npm badge to README.md\n- Update CHANGELOG.md with npm package release\n- Announce in release notes\n\n## Note\n- May need to choose different name if @beads namespace unavailable\n- Alternative: beads-cli, bd-cli, or unscoped beads-issue-tracker","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T23:40:25.263569-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T10:39:41.772338-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T10:39:41.772338-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-87a0","depends_on_id":"bd-febc","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-02T23:40:33.014043-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}],"comments":[{"id":5,"issue_id":"bd-87a0","author":"stevey","text":"Package is ready to publish. All code complete and tested locally. Next steps: 1) npm login, 2) create @beads org if needed, 3) npm publish --access public. See npm-package/PUBLISHING.md for complete instructions.","created_at":"2025-11-03T18:34:10Z"}]} {"id":"bd-8900f145","content_hash":"4a07f36a9e5d24aaffb092c89e2273cb58f9de357d24eeb01fcde6a4079ba775","title":"Testing event-driven mode!","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T15:28:33.564871-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.186325-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-29T19:12:54.43368-07:00"} {"id":"bd-8931","content_hash":"409c16d9e6c83c2bf6cccfa6ee6cb18e1e1eee032b522fb99500bb40f2a05649","title":"Daemon gets stuck when auto-import blocked by git conflicts","description":"CRITICAL: The daemon enters a corrupt state that breaks RPC commands when auto-import is triggered but git pull fails due to uncommitted changes.\n\nImpact: This is a data integrity and usability issue that could cause users to lose trust in Beads. The daemon silently fails for certain commands while appearing healthy.\n\nReproduction:\n1. Make local changes to issues (creates uncommitted .beads/beads.jsonl)\n2. Remote has updates (JSONL newer, triggers auto-import)\n3. Daemon tries to pull but fails: 'cannot pull with rebase: You have unstaged changes'\n4. Daemon enters bad state - 'bd show' and other commands return EOF\n5. 'bd list' still works, daemon process is running, no errors logged\n\nTechnical details:\n- Auto-import check runs in handleRequest() before processing RPC commands\n- When import is blocked, it appears to corrupt daemon state\n- Likely: deadlock, unclosed transaction, or storage handle corruption\n- Panic recovery (server_lifecycle_conn.go:183) didn't catch anything - not a panic\n\nRequired fix:\n- Auto-import must not block RPC command execution\n- Handle git pull failures gracefully without corrupting state\n- Consider: skip auto-import if git is dirty, queue import for later, or use separate goroutine\n- Add timeout/circuit breaker for import operations\n- Log clear warnings when auto-import is skipped\n\nWithout this fix, users in collaborative environments will frequently encounter mysterious EOF errors that require daemon restarts.","design":"Options to fix:\n\n1. Skip auto-import when git is dirty (safest, simplest)\n - Check git status before pull\n - Log warning and continue without import\n - User must manually import after cleaning git state\n\n2. Async import with timeout (better UX)\n - Run auto-import in background goroutine\n - Don't block RPC command execution\n - Timeout after 5s, log error if stuck\n - Use sync.Once or similar to prevent concurrent imports\n\n3. Transactional import with rollback\n - Wrap import in database transaction\n - Rollback if git operations fail\n - Ensure storage is never left in bad state\n\nRecommended: Combine #1 and #2\n- Check git status first, skip if dirty\n- If clean, do async import with timeout\n- Add metrics to track import success/failure rates","status":"closed","priority":0,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-02T17:15:25.181425-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T12:08:12.949061-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T12:08:12.949064-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-8931","depends_on_id":"bd-1048","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-02T17:15:25.181857-08:00","created_by":"stevey"}]} {"id":"bd-897a","content_hash":"ae488407bf5e71242535f4c35b59b0981d2b8b338d1701f19acba2c8e93049f0","title":"Add UNIQUE constraint on external_ref column","description":"The external_ref column should have a UNIQUE constraint to prevent multiple issues from having the same external reference. This ensures data integrity when syncing from external systems (Jira, GitHub, Linear).\n\nCurrent behavior:\n- Multiple issues can have the same external_ref\n- GetIssueByExternalRef returns first match (non-deterministic with duplicates)\n\nProposed solution:\n- Add UNIQUE constraint to external_ref column\n- Add migration to check for and resolve existing duplicates\n- Update tests to verify constraint enforcement\n\nRelated: bd-1022","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T15:31:54.718005-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T17:19:13.18726-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-02T17:19:13.187262-08:00"} @@ -277,6 +280,9 @@ {"id":"bd-fd56","content_hash":"50437cea170f5b8a962661711d2ba639f9c7d1494a55115408afe3cbc9bebc86","title":"Wrap git operations in GitClient interface","description":"Create internal/daemonrunner/git.go with GitClient interface (HasUpstream, HasChanges, Commit, Push, Pull). Default implementation using os/exec. Use in Syncer and Run loop for testability.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-01T11:41:14.88734-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T12:32:00.159595-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-02T12:32:00.159597-08:00"} {"id":"bd-fd8753d9","content_hash":"ae13fc833baa7d586a48ca62648dd4f0ee61fcc96aa1f238fb2639b6657b07da","title":"Document bd edit command and verify MCP exclusion","description":"Follow-up from PR #152:\n1. Add \"bd edit\" to AGENTS.md with \"Humans only\" note\n2. Verify MCP server doesn't expose bd edit command\n3. Consider adding test for command registration","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-26T13:23:47.982295-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.226229-07:00"} {"id":"bd-febc","content_hash":"804fdae49614ef8a3408f0dbc709acf2f9c75d640c6503307b6779b63d6f0f96","title":"npm package for bd with native binaries","description":"Create an npm package that wraps native bd binaries for easy installation in Claude Code for Web and other Node.js environments.\n\n## Problem\nClaude Code for Web sandboxes are full Linux VMs with npm support, but cannot easily download binaries from GitHub releases due to network restrictions or tooling limitations.\n\n## Solution\nPublish bd as an npm package that:\n- Downloads platform-specific native binaries during postinstall\n- Provides a CLI wrapper that invokes the native binary\n- Works seamlessly in Claude Code for Web SessionStart hooks\n- Maintains full feature parity (uses native SQLite)\n\n## Benefits vs WASM\n- ✅ Full SQLite support (no custom VFS needed)\n- ✅ All features work identically to native bd\n- ✅ Better performance (native vs WASM overhead)\n- ✅ ~4 hours effort vs ~2 days for WASM\n- ✅ Minimal maintenance burden\n\n## Success Criteria\n- npm install @beads/bd works in Claude Code for Web\n- All bd commands function identically to native binary\n- SessionStart hook documented for auto-installation\n- Package published to npm registry","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-02T23:39:37.684109-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T10:39:44.932565-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T10:39:44.932565-08:00"} +{"id":"bd-gm7p","content_hash":"a1e10af5f458557c6d249e9f60df06967a7aa3f6113a025f582d9a695141605a","title":"Use in-memory filesystem for test git operations","description":"Use tmpfs/ramdisk for git operations in tests to reduce I/O overhead.\n\nOptions:\n1. Mount /tmp as tmpfs in CI (GitHub Actions supports this)\n2. Use Go's testing.TB.TempDir() which may already use tmpfs on some systems\n3. Explicitly create ramdisk for tests on macOS\n\nExpected savings: 20-30% reduction in git operation time","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:19.803224-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:19.803224-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-gm7p","depends_on_id":"bd-l5gq","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:19.80414-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} +{"id":"bd-l5gq","content_hash":"b485239aea61b3265f1be077398e6cade0e35cb6049f5ba829adf4c3dab43f77","title":"Optimize test suite performance - cut runtime by 50%+","description":"## Problem\nTest suite takes ~20.8 seconds, with 95% of time spent in just 2 tests:\n- TestHashIDs_MultiCloneConverge: 11.08s (53%)\n- TestHashIDs_IdenticalContentDedup: 8.78s (42%)\n\nBoth tests in beads_hash_multiclone_test.go perform extensive Git operations (bare repos, multiple clones, sync rounds).\n\n## Goal\nCut total test time by at least 50% (to ~10 seconds or less).\n\n## Analysis\nTests already have some optimizations:\n- --shared --depth=1 --no-tags for fast cloning\n- Disabled hooks, gc, fsync\n- Support -short flag\n\n## Impact\n- Faster development feedback loop\n- Reduced CI costs and time\n- Better developer experience","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:23:14.410648-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T01:23:14.410648-08:00"} +{"id":"bd-pdwz","content_hash":"2bbf9f1a3d684b052064fd4c86c0722a289d05abea23153f29f8172ebda2412b","title":"Add t.Parallel() to slow hash multiclone tests","description":"Add t.Parallel() to TestHashIDs_MultiCloneConverge and TestHashIDs_IdenticalContentDedup so they run concurrently.\n\nExpected savings: ~10 seconds (from 20s to ~11s)\n\nImplementation:\n- Add t.Parallel() call at start of each test function\n- Verify tests don't share resources that would cause conflicts\n- Run tests to confirm they work in parallel\n\nFile: beads_hash_multiclone_test.go:34, :101","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:15.705228-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:15.705228-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-pdwz","depends_on_id":"bd-l5gq","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:15.706149-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} {"id":"bd-s02","content_hash":"911d456e4dabae028dd615b643c99058ef12e55ea523cb81cc933783c7b13546","title":"Manual task","description":"","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:10.022202-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:10.022202-08:00"} {"id":"bd-u8j","content_hash":"03131b068616b353b1f6c5d96a39f50680bf296629671060a7a364e76e049485","title":"Clarify exclusive lock protocol compatibility with multi-repo","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md proposes per-repo file locking (Decision #7) using flock on JSONL files. However, VC (a downstream library consumer) uses an exclusive lock protocol (vc-195, requires Beads v0.17.3+) that allows bd daemon and VC executor to coexist.\n\nNeed to clarify:\n- Does the proposed per-repo file locking work with VC's existing exclusive lock protocol?\n- Do library consumers like VC need to adapt their locking logic?\n- Can multiple repos be locked atomically for cross-repo operations?\n\nContext: contributor-workflow-analysis.md lines 662-681","acceptance_criteria":"- Documentation explicitly states compatibility or incompatibility with existing lock protocols\n- If incompatible, migration path is documented for library consumers\n- If compatible, example showing coexistence is provided","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:08.257493-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:08.257493-08:00"} {"id":"bd-wta","content_hash":"59b0c71f52b597b32340bf5675c0a5efa281d08ffcac72bb3ee7b6e6df58b4cf","title":"Add performance benchmarks for multi-repo hydration","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md asserts sub-second queries (line 702) and describes smart caching via file mtime tracking (Decision #4, lines 584-618), but doesn't provide concrete performance benchmarks.\n\nVC's requirement (from VC feedback section):\n- Executor polls GetReadyWork() every 5-10 seconds\n- Queries must be sub-second (ideally \u003c100ms)\n- Smart caching must avoid re-parsing JSONLs on every query\n\nSuggested performance targets to validate:\n- File stat overhead: \u003c1ms per repo\n- Hydration (when needed): \u003c500ms for typical JSONL (\u003c25k)\n- Query (from cache): \u003c10ms\n- Total GetReadyWork(): \u003c100ms (VC's requirement)\n\nAlso test at scale:\n- N=1 repo (baseline)\n- N=3 repos (typical)\n- N=10 repos (edge case)\n\nThese benchmarks are critical for library consumers like VC that run automated polling loops.","acceptance_criteria":"- Performance benchmark suite created for multi-repo hydration\n- Benchmarks cover file stat, hydration, and query times\n- Tests at N=1, N=3, N=10 repo scales\n- Results documented in contributor-workflow-analysis.md\n- Performance targets met or issues filed for optimization","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:39.331528-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:39.331528-08:00"}