feat(sync): add per-field merge strategies for conflict resolution

Implements configurable per-field merge strategies (hq-ew1mbr.11):

- Add FieldStrategy type with strategies: newest, max, union, manual
- Add conflict.fields config section for per-field overrides
- compaction_level defaults to "max" (highest value wins)
- estimated_minutes defaults to "manual" (flags for user resolution)
- labels defaults to "union" (set merge)

Manual conflicts are displayed during sync with resolution options:
  bd sync --ours / --theirs, or bd resolve <id> <field> <value>

Config example:
  conflict:
    strategy: newest
    fields:
      compaction_level: max
      estimated_minutes: manual
      labels: union

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
beads/crew/lydia
2026-01-21 19:39:20 -08:00
committed by Steve Yegge
parent e0dc3a37c3
commit 9a9704b451
9 changed files with 698 additions and 91 deletions

View File

@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ func makeTestIssue(id, title string, status types.Status, priority int, updatedA
func TestMergeIssue_NoBase_LocalOnly(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local Issue", types.StatusOpen, 1, time.Now())
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(nil, local, nil)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(nil, local, nil)
if strategy != StrategyLocal {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyLocal, strategy)
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_NoBase_LocalOnly(t *testing.T) {
func TestMergeIssue_NoBase_RemoteOnly(t *testing.T) {
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-5678", "Remote Issue", types.StatusOpen, 2, time.Now())
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(nil, nil, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(nil, nil, remote)
if strategy != StrategyRemote {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyRemote, strategy)
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_NoBase_BothExist_LocalNewer(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local Title", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour))
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote Title", types.StatusOpen, 2, now)
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(nil, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(nil, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_NoBase_BothExist_RemoteNewer(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local Title", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote Title", types.StatusOpen, 2, now.Add(time.Hour))
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(nil, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(nil, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_NoBase_BothExist_SameTime(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local Title", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote Title", types.StatusOpen, 2, now)
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(nil, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(nil, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_NoChanges(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Same Title", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Same Title", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategySame {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategySame, strategy)
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_OnlyLocalChanged(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Updated Title", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour))
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Original Title", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyLocal {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyLocal, strategy)
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_OnlyRemoteChanged(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Original Title", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Updated Title", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour))
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyRemote {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyRemote, strategy)
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_BothMadeSameChange(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Same Update", types.StatusClosed, 2, now.Add(time.Hour))
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Same Update", types.StatusClosed, 2, now.Add(time.Hour))
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategySame {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategySame, strategy)
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_TrueConflict_LocalNewer(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local Update", types.StatusInProgress, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote Update", types.StatusClosed, 2, now.Add(time.Hour))
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_TrueConflict_RemoteNewer(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local Update", types.StatusInProgress, 1, now.Add(time.Hour))
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote Update", types.StatusClosed, 2, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_LocalDeleted_RemoteUnchanged(t *testing.T) {
base := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "To Delete", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "To Delete", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, nil, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, nil, remote)
if strategy != StrategyLocal {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s (honor local deletion), got %s", StrategyLocal, strategy)
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_LocalDeleted_RemoteChanged(t *testing.T) {
base := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Original", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote Updated", types.StatusClosed, 2, now.Add(time.Hour))
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, nil, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, nil, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s (conflict: deleted vs updated), got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_RemoteDeleted_LocalUnchanged(t *testing.T) {
base := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "To Delete", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "To Delete", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, nil)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, nil)
if strategy != StrategyRemote {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s (honor remote deletion), got %s", StrategyRemote, strategy)
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ func TestMergeIssue_RemoteDeleted_LocalChanged(t *testing.T) {
base := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Original", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local Updated", types.StatusClosed, 2, now.Add(time.Hour))
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, nil)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, nil)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s (conflict: updated vs deleted), got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ func TestFieldMerge_LWW_LocalNewer(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local Update", types.StatusInProgress, 2, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote Update", types.StatusClosed, 3, now.Add(time.Hour))
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ func TestFieldMerge_LWW_RemoteNewer(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local Update", types.StatusInProgress, 2, now.Add(time.Hour))
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote Update", types.StatusClosed, 3, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ func TestFieldMerge_LWW_SameTimestamp(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local Update", types.StatusInProgress, 2, now)
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote Update", types.StatusClosed, 3, now)
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ func TestLabelUnion_BothAdd(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssueWithLabels("bd-1234", "Test Local", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour), []string{"original", "local-added"})
remote := makeTestIssueWithLabels("bd-1234", "Test Remote", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour), []string{"original", "remote-added"})
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ func TestLabelUnion_LocalOnly(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssueWithLabels("bd-1234", "Test Local", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour), []string{"original", "local-added"})
remote := makeTestIssueWithLabels("bd-1234", "Test Remote", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour), []string{"original"})
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ func TestLabelUnion_RemoteOnly(t *testing.T) {
local := makeTestIssueWithLabels("bd-1234", "Test Local", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour), []string{"original"})
remote := makeTestIssueWithLabels("bd-1234", "Test Remote", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour), []string{"original", "remote-added"})
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ func TestDependencyUnion(t *testing.T) {
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Test Remote", types.StatusClosed, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
remote.Dependencies = []*types.Dependency{remoteDep}
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ func TestCommentAppend(t *testing.T) {
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Test Remote", types.StatusClosed, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
remote.Comments = []*types.Comment{commonComment, remoteComment}
merged, strategy := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, strategy, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if strategy != StrategyMerged {
t.Errorf("Expected strategy=%s, got %s", StrategyMerged, strategy)
@@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ func TestFieldMerge_EdgeCases(t *testing.T) {
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Test Remote", types.StatusClosed, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
remote.Labels = []string{"remote-label"}
merged, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, _, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if merged == nil {
t.Fatal("Expected merged issue, got nil")
}
@@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ func TestFieldMerge_EdgeCases(t *testing.T) {
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Test Remote", types.StatusClosed, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
remote.Labels = []string{"remote-label"}
merged, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, _, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if merged == nil {
t.Fatal("Expected merged issue, got nil")
}
@@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ func TestFieldMerge_EdgeCases(t *testing.T) {
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Test Remote", types.StatusClosed, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
remote.Dependencies = nil
merged, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, _, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if merged == nil {
t.Fatal("Expected merged issue, got nil")
}
@@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ func TestFieldMerge_EdgeCases(t *testing.T) {
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Test Remote", types.StatusClosed, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
remote.Comments = []*types.Comment{comment}
merged, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, _, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if merged == nil {
t.Fatal("Expected merged issue, got nil")
}
@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ func TestFieldMerge_EdgeCases(t *testing.T) {
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Test Remote", types.StatusClosed, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour))
remote.Dependencies = []*types.Dependency{remoteDep}
merged, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
merged, _, _ := MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
if merged == nil {
t.Fatal("Expected merged issue, got nil")
}
@@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ func TestMergeClockSkewWarning(t *testing.T) {
r, w, _ := os.Pipe()
os.Stderr = w
_, _ = MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
_, _, _ = MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
w.Close()
os.Stderr = oldStderr
@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ func TestMergeClockSkewWarning(t *testing.T) {
r, w, _ := os.Pipe()
os.Stderr = w
_, _ = MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
_, _, _ = MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
w.Close()
os.Stderr = oldStderr
@@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ func TestMergeClockSkewWarning(t *testing.T) {
r, w, _ := os.Pipe()
os.Stderr = w
_, _ = MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
_, _, _ = MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
w.Close()
os.Stderr = oldStderr
@@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ func TestMergeClockSkewWarning(t *testing.T) {
r, w, _ := os.Pipe()
os.Stderr = w
_, _ = MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
_, _, _ = MergeIssue(base, local, remote)
w.Close()
os.Stderr = oldStderr
@@ -1409,3 +1409,199 @@ func TestMergeLabels(t *testing.T) {
})
}
}
// TestMergeFieldLevel_CompactionLevel tests compaction_level uses max strategy by default
func TestMergeFieldLevel_CompactionLevel(t *testing.T) {
now := time.Now()
t.Run("max_strategy_takes_higher_value", func(t *testing.T) {
// Local has higher compaction_level
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour))
local.CompactionLevel = 5
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remote.CompactionLevel = 3
merged, manualConflicts := mergeFieldLevel(nil, local, remote)
if merged.CompactionLevel != 5 {
t.Errorf("Expected compaction_level=5 (max), got %d", merged.CompactionLevel)
}
if len(manualConflicts) != 0 {
t.Errorf("Expected no manual conflicts, got %d", len(manualConflicts))
}
})
t.Run("max_strategy_takes_higher_from_remote", func(t *testing.T) {
// Remote has higher compaction_level
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour))
local.CompactionLevel = 2
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remote.CompactionLevel = 7
merged, manualConflicts := mergeFieldLevel(nil, local, remote)
if merged.CompactionLevel != 7 {
t.Errorf("Expected compaction_level=7 (max), got %d", merged.CompactionLevel)
}
if len(manualConflicts) != 0 {
t.Errorf("Expected no manual conflicts, got %d", len(manualConflicts))
}
})
}
// TestMergeFieldLevel_EstimatedMinutes tests estimated_minutes uses manual strategy by default
func TestMergeFieldLevel_EstimatedMinutes(t *testing.T) {
now := time.Now()
t.Run("manual_strategy_flags_conflict_when_different", func(t *testing.T) {
// Default is manual strategy - should flag conflict when values differ
localMins := 120
remoteMins := 60
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour))
local.EstimatedMinutes = &localMins
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remote.EstimatedMinutes = &remoteMins
merged, manualConflicts := mergeFieldLevel(nil, local, remote)
// Should keep local value as tentative
if merged.EstimatedMinutes == nil || *merged.EstimatedMinutes != 120 {
t.Errorf("Expected estimated_minutes=120 (local as tentative), got %v", merged.EstimatedMinutes)
}
// Should flag for manual resolution
if len(manualConflicts) != 1 {
t.Errorf("Expected 1 manual conflict, got %d", len(manualConflicts))
} else {
mc := manualConflicts[0]
if mc.Field != "estimated_minutes" {
t.Errorf("Expected field=estimated_minutes, got %s", mc.Field)
}
if mc.LocalValue != 120 {
t.Errorf("Expected LocalValue=120, got %v", mc.LocalValue)
}
if mc.RemoteValue != 60 {
t.Errorf("Expected RemoteValue=60, got %v", mc.RemoteValue)
}
}
})
t.Run("manual_strategy_no_conflict_when_same", func(t *testing.T) {
// No conflict when values are the same
mins := 120
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour))
local.EstimatedMinutes = &mins
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remoteMins := 120
remote.EstimatedMinutes = &remoteMins
merged, manualConflicts := mergeFieldLevel(nil, local, remote)
if merged.EstimatedMinutes == nil || *merged.EstimatedMinutes != 120 {
t.Errorf("Expected estimated_minutes=120, got %v", merged.EstimatedMinutes)
}
if len(manualConflicts) != 0 {
t.Errorf("Expected no manual conflicts when values match, got %d", len(manualConflicts))
}
})
t.Run("manual_strategy_nil_vs_value_flags_conflict", func(t *testing.T) {
// Conflict when one is nil and other has value
remoteMins := 60
local := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour))
local.EstimatedMinutes = nil
remote := makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote", types.StatusOpen, 1, now)
remote.EstimatedMinutes = &remoteMins
merged, manualConflicts := mergeFieldLevel(nil, local, remote)
// Should keep local value (nil) as tentative
if merged.EstimatedMinutes != nil {
t.Errorf("Expected estimated_minutes=nil (local as tentative), got %v", *merged.EstimatedMinutes)
}
// Should flag for manual resolution
if len(manualConflicts) != 1 {
t.Errorf("Expected 1 manual conflict, got %d", len(manualConflicts))
}
})
}
// TestMaxInt tests the maxInt helper function
func TestMaxInt(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
a, b, expected int
}{
{0, 0, 0},
{1, 0, 1},
{0, 1, 1},
{5, 3, 5},
{3, 5, 5},
{-1, -2, -1},
{-2, -1, -1},
}
for _, tc := range tests {
result := maxInt(tc.a, tc.b)
if result != tc.expected {
t.Errorf("maxInt(%d, %d) = %d, expected %d", tc.a, tc.b, result, tc.expected)
}
}
}
// TestMaxIntPtr tests the maxIntPtr helper function
func TestMaxIntPtr(t *testing.T) {
five := 5
three := 3
t.Run("both_nil_returns_nil", func(t *testing.T) {
result := maxIntPtr(nil, nil)
if result != nil {
t.Errorf("Expected nil, got %v", result)
}
})
t.Run("left_nil_returns_right", func(t *testing.T) {
result := maxIntPtr(nil, &three)
if result == nil || *result != 3 {
t.Errorf("Expected 3, got %v", result)
}
})
t.Run("right_nil_returns_left", func(t *testing.T) {
result := maxIntPtr(&five, nil)
if result == nil || *result != 5 {
t.Errorf("Expected 5, got %v", result)
}
})
t.Run("returns_larger_value", func(t *testing.T) {
result := maxIntPtr(&three, &five)
if result == nil || *result != 5 {
t.Errorf("Expected 5, got %v", result)
}
result = maxIntPtr(&five, &three)
if result == nil || *result != 5 {
t.Errorf("Expected 5, got %v", result)
}
})
}
// TestMergeResult_ManualConflicts tests that ManualConflicts is properly initialized
func TestMergeResult_ManualConflicts(t *testing.T) {
now := time.Now()
base := []*types.Issue{
makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Base", types.StatusOpen, 1, now),
}
local := []*types.Issue{
makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Local", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(time.Hour)),
}
remote := []*types.Issue{
makeTestIssue("bd-1234", "Remote", types.StatusOpen, 1, now.Add(2*time.Hour)),
}
result := MergeIssues(base, local, remote)
if result.ManualConflicts == nil {
t.Error("ManualConflicts should be initialized, got nil")
}
}