diff --git a/.beads/beads.jsonl b/.beads/beads.jsonl
index 7e0ca692..829f902b 100644
--- a/.beads/beads.jsonl
+++ b/.beads/beads.jsonl
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 {"id":"bd-13gm","content_hash":"891783bfe2e92928d2ef17f791f6678fbc3fd352be782b6a90834b1d86776d45","title":"Add explicit cache validation tests for blocked_issues_cache","description":"The blocked_issues_cache optimization works correctly but lacks explicit tests that verify cache invalidation behavior.\n\n## What to test\n\n1. **Cache invalidation on dependency add**\n   - Add a blocking dependency\n   - Verify blocked issue appears in cache\n   \n2. **Cache invalidation on dependency remove**\n   - Remove a blocking dependency\n   - Verify blocked issue removed from cache\n   \n3. **Cache invalidation on status change**\n   - Close a blocker issue\n   - Verify dependent issue removed from cache\n   - Reopen blocker\n   - Verify dependent issue added back to cache\n\n4. **Cache consistency across operations**\n   - Multiple dependency changes in sequence\n   - Verify cache stays consistent with actual blocking state\n\n5. **Parent-child transitive blocking**\n   - Create epic with child tasks\n   - Add blocking dependency to epic\n   - Verify all children appear in cache\n\n## Implementation\n\nAdd tests to internal/storage/sqlite/blocked_cache_test.go (new file) with direct cache queries:\n\n```go\nfunc TestBlockedCacheInvalidation(t *testing.T) {\n    // Verify cache updates correctly on dependency changes\n}\n\nfunc TestBlockedCacheConsistency(t *testing.T) {\n    // Verify cache matches actual blocking state\n}\n```\n\n## Why this matters\n\n- Current tests verify behavior but not implementation\n- Explicit cache tests catch cache-specific bugs\n- Makes cache correctness visible in test output\n- Easier debugging if cache gets out of sync\n\n## Related\n\n- [deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:bd-5qim]]]]]]: GetReadyWork performance optimization (implemented cache)\n- internal/storage/sqlite/blocked_cache.go\n- internal/storage/sqlite/ready_test.go (behavior tests)","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-23T20:06:55.736412-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:22:04.177645-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:22:04.177645-08:00","source_repo":"."}
-{"id":"bd-19er","content_hash":"1c5d51dd38f04db00b26c19f47fc7624ff878d554dea59816467ca97eb234970","title":"Create backup and restore procedures","description":"Disaster recovery procedures for Agent Mail data.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n- Automated daily snapshots (GCP persistent disk)\n- SQLite backup script\n- Git repository backup\n- Restore procedure documentation\n- Test restore from backup\n\nFile: deployment/agent-mail/backup.sh","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.417403-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.417403-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-19er","depends_on_id":"bd-z3s3","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-07T23:04:28.122501-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
-{"id":"bd-1a6j","content_hash":"16f978c58b9988457aeb1eaff37fb17f12e91325549b38be10362a08923e9a2d","title":"Test issue 2","description":"","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T19:07:12.24632-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-07T19:07:12.24632-08:00","source_repo":"."}
+{"id":"bd-19er","content_hash":"1c5d51dd38f04db00b26c19f47fc7624ff878d554dea59816467ca97eb234970","title":"Create backup and restore procedures","description":"Disaster recovery procedures for Agent Mail data.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n- Automated daily snapshots (GCP persistent disk)\n- SQLite backup script\n- Git repository backup\n- Restore procedure documentation\n- Test restore from backup\n\nFile: deployment/agent-mail/backup.sh","status":"closed","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.417403-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:39:00.061047-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:39:00.061047-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-19er","depends_on_id":"bd-z3s3","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-07T23:04:28.122501-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
+{"id":"bd-1a6j","content_hash":"16f978c58b9988457aeb1eaff37fb17f12e91325549b38be10362a08923e9a2d","title":"Test issue 2","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T19:07:12.24632-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:35:04.068982-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:35:04.068982-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-1pj6","content_hash":"de1c1195b29d9a70c88b5f2b05ca1c3497469d1802f9c0be415d5a44b0575deb","title":"Proposal: Custom status states via config","description":"Proposal to add 'custom status states' via `bd config`.\nUsers could define an optional issue status enum (e.g., awaiting_review, review_in_progress) in the config.\nThis would enable multi-step pipelines to process issues where each step correlates to a specific status.\n\nExamples:\n- awaiting_verification\n- awaiting_docs\n- awaiting_testing\n","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-20T18:55:48.670499-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T18:55:48.670499-05:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-1qwo","content_hash":"25bf1f3ad5446196b5c8ec7c8772816a539d80ae1a1899c26a863a28e5733dc1","title":"Audit and enforce consistent error handling patterns across codebase","description":"**Background:** Error handling patterns are now documented in docs/ERROR_HANDLING.md (bd-9lwr). We have three established patterns:\n- Pattern A: Exit immediately (os.Exit) for fatal errors\n- Pattern B: Warn and continue for optional operations\n- Pattern C: Silent ignore for cleanup/best-effort\n\n**Goal:** Systematically review all error handling in cmd/bd to ensure each instance uses the appropriate pattern according to the guidelines.\n\n**Scope:** \n- Review all files in cmd/bd/*.go\n- Focus on files with high usage: create.go, init.go, sync.go, daemon_sync.go, export.go, import.go\n- Identify outliers where similar operations use different patterns\n- Refactor to use consistent patterns\n\n**Acceptance Criteria:**\n- Similar operations (e.g., all metadata updates) use the same pattern\n- Critical operations always use Pattern A\n- Auxiliary operations use Pattern B or C appropriately\n- No mixed patterns for identical operation types\n\n**References:**\n- docs/ERROR_HANDLING.md - Guidelines and decision tree\n- bd-9lwr - Documentation task\n- bd-bwk2 - Related storage layer error handling work","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-23T21:53:25.687087-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T21:53:25.687087-08:00","source_repo":"."}
-{"id":"bd-1rh","content_hash":"b034205d7620a61a755edfe2b849fdbc666fc38e04b53d5cbade3dacfd6e8a41","title":"cmd/bd test suite is absurdly slow - 279 tests taking 8+ minutes","description":"# Problem\n\nThe cmd/bd test suite is painfully slow:\n- **279 tests** in cmd/bd alone\n- Full suite takes **8+ minutes** to run\n- Even with the 16 slowest integration tests now tagged with `integration` build tag, the remaining tests still take forever\n\nThis makes the development loop unusable. We can't wait 8+ minutes every time we want to run tests.\n\n# Root Cause Analysis\n\n## 1. Sheer Volume\n279 tests is too many for a single package. Even at 0.1s per test, that's 28 seconds minimum just for cmd/bd.\n\n## 2. Each Test Creates Full Database + Temp Directories\nEvery test does heavy setup:\n- Creates temp directory (`t.TempDir()` or `os.MkdirTemp`)\n- Initializes SQLite database\n- Sets up git repo in many cases\n- Creates full storage layer\n\nExample from the tests:\n```go\nfunc setupCLITestDB(t *testing.T) string {\n    tmpDir := createTempDirWithCleanup(t)\n    runBDInProcess(t, tmpDir, \"init\", \"--prefix\", \"test\", \"--quiet\")\n    return tmpDir\n}\n```\n\nThis happens 279 times!\n\n## 3. Tests Are Not Properly Categorized\nWe have three types of tests mixed together:\n- **Unit tests** - should be fast, test single functions\n- **Integration tests** - test full workflows, need DB/git\n- **End-to-end tests** - test entire CLI commands\n\nThey're all lumped together in cmd/bd, all running every time.\n\n# What We've Already Fixed\n\nAdded `integration` build tags to 16 obviously-slow test files:\n- import_profile_test.go (performance benchmarking tests)\n- export_mtime_test.go (tests with time.Sleep calls)\n- cli_fast_test.go (full CLI integration tests)\n- delete_test.go, import_uncommitted_test.go, sync_local_only_test.go (git integration)\n- And 10 more in internal/ packages\n\nThese are now excluded from the default `go test ./...` run.\n\n# Proposed Solutions\n\n## Option 1: Shared Test Fixtures (Quick Win)\nCreate a shared test database that multiple tests can use:\n```go\nvar testDB *sqlite.SQLiteStorage\nvar testDBOnce sync.Once\n\nfunc getSharedTestDB(t *testing.T) storage.Storage {\n    testDBOnce.Do(func() {\n        // Create one DB for all tests\n    })\n    return testDB\n}\n```\n\n**Pros**: Easy to implement, immediate speedup\n**Cons**: Tests become less isolated, harder to debug failures\n\n## Option 2: Table-Driven Tests (Medium Win)\nCollapse similar tests into table-driven tests:\n```go\nfunc TestCreate(t *testing.T) {\n    tests := []struct{\n        name string\n        args []string\n        want string\n    }{\n        {\"basic issue\", []string{\"create\", \"Test\"}, \"created\"},\n        {\"with description\", []string{\"create\", \"Test\", \"-d\", \"desc\"}, \"created\"},\n        // ... 50 more cases\n    }\n    \n    db := setupOnce(t) // Setup once, not 50 times\n    for _, tt := range tests {\n        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {\n            // test using shared db\n        })\n    }\n}\n```\n\n**Pros**: Dramatically reduces setup overhead, tests run in parallel\n**Cons**: Requires refactoring, tests share more state\n\n## Option 3: Split cmd/bd Tests Into Packages (Big Win)\nMove tests into focused packages:\n- `cmd/bd/internal/clitests` - CLI integration tests (mark with integration tag)\n- `cmd/bd/internal/unittests` - Fast unit tests\n- Keep only essential tests in cmd/bd\n\n**Pros**: Clean separation, easy to run just fast tests\n**Cons**: Requires significant refactoring\n\n## Option 4: Parallel Execution (Quick Win)\nAdd `t.Parallel()` to independent tests:\n```go\nfunc TestSomething(t *testing.T) {\n    t.Parallel() // Run this test concurrently with others\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\n**Pros**: Easy to add, can cut time in half on multi-core machines\n**Cons**: Doesn't reduce actual test work, just parallelizes it\n\n## Option 5: In-Memory Databases (Medium Win)\nUse `:memory:` SQLite databases instead of file-based:\n```go\nstore, err := sqlite.New(ctx, \":memory:\")\n```\n\n**Pros**: Faster than disk I/O, easier cleanup\n**Cons**: Some tests need actual file-based DBs (export/import tests)\n\n# Recommended Approach\n\n**Short-term (this week)**:\n1. Add `t.Parallel()` to all independent tests in cmd/bd\n2. Use `:memory:` databases where possible\n3. Create table-driven tests for similar test cases\n\n**Medium-term (next sprint)**:\n4. Split cmd/bd tests into focused packages\n5. Mark more integration tests appropriately\n\n**Long-term (backlog)**:\n6. Consider shared test fixtures with proper isolation\n\n# Current Status\n\nWe've tagged 16 files with `integration` build tag, but the remaining 279 tests in cmd/bd still take 8+ minutes. This issue tracks fixing the cmd/bd test performance specifically.\n\n# Target\n\nGet `go test ./...` (without `-short` or `-tags=integration`) down to **under 30 seconds**.\n\n\n# THE REAL ROOT CAUSE (Updated Analysis)\n\nAfter examining the actual test code, the problem is clear:\n\n## Every Test Creates Its Own Database From Scratch\n\nLook at `create_test.go`:\n```go\nfunc TestCreate_BasicIssue(t *testing.T) {\n    tmpDir := t.TempDir()                          // ← Creates temp dir\n    testDB := filepath.Join(tmpDir, \".beads\", \"beads.db\")\n    s := newTestStore(t, testDB)                   // ← Opens NEW SQLite connection\n                                                    // ← Runs migrations\n                                                    // ← Sets config\n    // ... actual test (3 lines)\n}\n\nfunc TestCreate_WithDescription(t *testing.T) {\n    tmpDir := t.TempDir()                          // ← Creates ANOTHER temp dir\n    testDB := filepath.Join(tmpDir, \".beads\", \"beads.db\")\n    s := newTestStore(t, testDB)                   // ← Opens ANOTHER SQLite connection\n    // ... actual test (3 lines)\n}\n```\n\n**This happens 279 times!**\n\n## These Tests Don't Need Isolation!\n\nMost tests are just checking:\n- \"Can I create an issue with a title?\"\n- \"Can I create an issue with a description?\"\n- \"Can I add labels?\"\n\nThey don't conflict with each other. They could all share ONE database!\n\n## The Fix: Test Suites with Shared Setup\n\nInstead of:\n```go\nfunc TestCreate_BasicIssue(t *testing.T) {\n    s := newTestStore(t, t.TempDir()+\"/db\")  // ← Expensive!\n    // test\n}\n\nfunc TestCreate_WithDesc(t *testing.T) {\n    s := newTestStore(t, t.TempDir()+\"/db\")  // ← Expensive!\n    // test\n}\n```\n\nDo this:\n```go\nfunc TestCreate(t *testing.T) {\n    // ONE setup for all subtests\n    s := newTestStore(t, t.TempDir()+\"/db\")\n    \n    t.Run(\"basic_issue\", func(t *testing.T) {\n        t.Parallel()  // Can run concurrently - tests don't conflict\n        // test using shared `s`\n    })\n    \n    t.Run(\"with_description\", func(t *testing.T) {\n        t.Parallel()\n        // test using shared `s`\n    })\n    \n    // ... 50 more subtests, all using same DB\n}\n```\n\n**Result**: 50 tests → 1 database setup instead of 50!\n\n## Why This Works\n\nSQLite is fine with concurrent reads and isolated transactions. These tests:\n- ✅ Create different issues (no ID conflicts)\n- ✅ Just read back what they created\n- ✅ Don't depend on database state from other tests\n\nThey SHOULD share a database!\n\n## Real Numbers\n\nCurrent:\n- 279 tests × (create dir + init SQLite + migrations) = **8 minutes**\n\nAfter fix:\n- 10 test suites × (create dir + init SQLite + migrations) = **30 seconds**\n- 279 subtests running in parallel using those 10 DBs = **5 seconds**\n\n**Total: ~35 seconds instead of 8 minutes!**\n\n## Implementation Plan\n\n1. **Group related tests** into suites (Create, List, Update, Delete, etc.)\n2. **One setup per suite** instead of per test\n3. **Use t.Run() for subtests** with t.Parallel()\n4. **Keep tests that actually need isolation** separate (export/import tests, git operations)\n\nThis is way better than shuffling tests into folders!","notes":"## Progress Update (2025-11-21)\n\n✅ **Completed**:\n- Audited all 280 tests, created TEST_SUITE_AUDIT.md ([deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:bd-c49]]]]]]])\n- Refactored create_test.go to shared DB pattern ([deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:bd-y6d]]]]]]])\n- Proven the pattern works: 11 tests now run in 0.04s with 1 DB instead of 11\n\n❌ **Current Reality**:\n- Overall test suite: Still 8+ minutes (no meaningful change)\n- Only 1 of 76 test files refactored\n- Saved ~10 DB initializations out of 280\n\n## Acceptance Criteria (REALISTIC)\n\nThis task is NOT complete until:\n- [ ] All P1 files refactored (create ✅, dep, stale, comments, list, ready)\n- [ ] Test suite runs in \u003c 2 minutes\n- [ ] Measured and verified actual speedup\n\n## Next Steps\n\n1. Refactor remaining 5 P1 files: dep_test.go, stale_test.go, comments_test.go, list_test.go, ready_test.go\n2. Measure actual time improvement after each file\n3. Continue with P2 files if needed to hit \u003c2min target","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-21T11:37:47.886207-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T22:38:46.781486-08:00","source_repo":"."}
+{"id":"bd-1rh","content_hash":"b034205d7620a61a755edfe2b849fdbc666fc38e04b53d5cbade3dacfd6e8a41","title":"cmd/bd test suite is absurdly slow - 279 tests taking 8+ minutes","description":"# Problem\n\nThe cmd/bd test suite is painfully slow:\n- **279 tests** in cmd/bd alone\n- Full suite takes **8+ minutes** to run\n- Even with the 16 slowest integration tests now tagged with `integration` build tag, the remaining tests still take forever\n\nThis makes the development loop unusable. We can't wait 8+ minutes every time we want to run tests.\n\n# Root Cause Analysis\n\n## 1. Sheer Volume\n279 tests is too many for a single package. Even at 0.1s per test, that's 28 seconds minimum just for cmd/bd.\n\n## 2. Each Test Creates Full Database + Temp Directories\nEvery test does heavy setup:\n- Creates temp directory (`t.TempDir()` or `os.MkdirTemp`)\n- Initializes SQLite database\n- Sets up git repo in many cases\n- Creates full storage layer\n\nExample from the tests:\n```go\nfunc setupCLITestDB(t *testing.T) string {\n    tmpDir := createTempDirWithCleanup(t)\n    runBDInProcess(t, tmpDir, \"init\", \"--prefix\", \"test\", \"--quiet\")\n    return tmpDir\n}\n```\n\nThis happens 279 times!\n\n## 3. Tests Are Not Properly Categorized\nWe have three types of tests mixed together:\n- **Unit tests** - should be fast, test single functions\n- **Integration tests** - test full workflows, need DB/git\n- **End-to-end tests** - test entire CLI commands\n\nThey're all lumped together in cmd/bd, all running every time.\n\n# What We've Already Fixed\n\nAdded `integration` build tags to 16 obviously-slow test files:\n- import_profile_test.go (performance benchmarking tests)\n- export_mtime_test.go (tests with time.Sleep calls)\n- cli_fast_test.go (full CLI integration tests)\n- delete_test.go, import_uncommitted_test.go, sync_local_only_test.go (git integration)\n- And 10 more in internal/ packages\n\nThese are now excluded from the default `go test ./...` run.\n\n# Proposed Solutions\n\n## Option 1: Shared Test Fixtures (Quick Win)\nCreate a shared test database that multiple tests can use:\n```go\nvar testDB *sqlite.SQLiteStorage\nvar testDBOnce sync.Once\n\nfunc getSharedTestDB(t *testing.T) storage.Storage {\n    testDBOnce.Do(func() {\n        // Create one DB for all tests\n    })\n    return testDB\n}\n```\n\n**Pros**: Easy to implement, immediate speedup\n**Cons**: Tests become less isolated, harder to debug failures\n\n## Option 2: Table-Driven Tests (Medium Win)\nCollapse similar tests into table-driven tests:\n```go\nfunc TestCreate(t *testing.T) {\n    tests := []struct{\n        name string\n        args []string\n        want string\n    }{\n        {\"basic issue\", []string{\"create\", \"Test\"}, \"created\"},\n        {\"with description\", []string{\"create\", \"Test\", \"-d\", \"desc\"}, \"created\"},\n        // ... 50 more cases\n    }\n    \n    db := setupOnce(t) // Setup once, not 50 times\n    for _, tt := range tests {\n        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {\n            // test using shared db\n        })\n    }\n}\n```\n\n**Pros**: Dramatically reduces setup overhead, tests run in parallel\n**Cons**: Requires refactoring, tests share more state\n\n## Option 3: Split cmd/bd Tests Into Packages (Big Win)\nMove tests into focused packages:\n- `cmd/bd/internal/clitests` - CLI integration tests (mark with integration tag)\n- `cmd/bd/internal/unittests` - Fast unit tests\n- Keep only essential tests in cmd/bd\n\n**Pros**: Clean separation, easy to run just fast tests\n**Cons**: Requires significant refactoring\n\n## Option 4: Parallel Execution (Quick Win)\nAdd `t.Parallel()` to independent tests:\n```go\nfunc TestSomething(t *testing.T) {\n    t.Parallel() // Run this test concurrently with others\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\n**Pros**: Easy to add, can cut time in half on multi-core machines\n**Cons**: Doesn't reduce actual test work, just parallelizes it\n\n## Option 5: In-Memory Databases (Medium Win)\nUse `:memory:` SQLite databases instead of file-based:\n```go\nstore, err := sqlite.New(ctx, \":memory:\")\n```\n\n**Pros**: Faster than disk I/O, easier cleanup\n**Cons**: Some tests need actual file-based DBs (export/import tests)\n\n# Recommended Approach\n\n**Short-term (this week)**:\n1. Add `t.Parallel()` to all independent tests in cmd/bd\n2. Use `:memory:` databases where possible\n3. Create table-driven tests for similar test cases\n\n**Medium-term (next sprint)**:\n4. Split cmd/bd tests into focused packages\n5. Mark more integration tests appropriately\n\n**Long-term (backlog)**:\n6. Consider shared test fixtures with proper isolation\n\n# Current Status\n\nWe've tagged 16 files with `integration` build tag, but the remaining 279 tests in cmd/bd still take 8+ minutes. This issue tracks fixing the cmd/bd test performance specifically.\n\n# Target\n\nGet `go test ./...` (without `-short` or `-tags=integration`) down to **under 30 seconds**.\n\n\n# THE REAL ROOT CAUSE (Updated Analysis)\n\nAfter examining the actual test code, the problem is clear:\n\n## Every Test Creates Its Own Database From Scratch\n\nLook at `create_test.go`:\n```go\nfunc TestCreate_BasicIssue(t *testing.T) {\n    tmpDir := t.TempDir()                          // ← Creates temp dir\n    testDB := filepath.Join(tmpDir, \".beads\", \"beads.db\")\n    s := newTestStore(t, testDB)                   // ← Opens NEW SQLite connection\n                                                    // ← Runs migrations\n                                                    // ← Sets config\n    // ... actual test (3 lines)\n}\n\nfunc TestCreate_WithDescription(t *testing.T) {\n    tmpDir := t.TempDir()                          // ← Creates ANOTHER temp dir\n    testDB := filepath.Join(tmpDir, \".beads\", \"beads.db\")\n    s := newTestStore(t, testDB)                   // ← Opens ANOTHER SQLite connection\n    // ... actual test (3 lines)\n}\n```\n\n**This happens 279 times!**\n\n## These Tests Don't Need Isolation!\n\nMost tests are just checking:\n- \"Can I create an issue with a title?\"\n- \"Can I create an issue with a description?\"\n- \"Can I add labels?\"\n\nThey don't conflict with each other. They could all share ONE database!\n\n## The Fix: Test Suites with Shared Setup\n\nInstead of:\n```go\nfunc TestCreate_BasicIssue(t *testing.T) {\n    s := newTestStore(t, t.TempDir()+\"/db\")  // ← Expensive!\n    // test\n}\n\nfunc TestCreate_WithDesc(t *testing.T) {\n    s := newTestStore(t, t.TempDir()+\"/db\")  // ← Expensive!\n    // test\n}\n```\n\nDo this:\n```go\nfunc TestCreate(t *testing.T) {\n    // ONE setup for all subtests\n    s := newTestStore(t, t.TempDir()+\"/db\")\n    \n    t.Run(\"basic_issue\", func(t *testing.T) {\n        t.Parallel()  // Can run concurrently - tests don't conflict\n        // test using shared `s`\n    })\n    \n    t.Run(\"with_description\", func(t *testing.T) {\n        t.Parallel()\n        // test using shared `s`\n    })\n    \n    // ... 50 more subtests, all using same DB\n}\n```\n\n**Result**: 50 tests → 1 database setup instead of 50!\n\n## Why This Works\n\nSQLite is fine with concurrent reads and isolated transactions. These tests:\n- ✅ Create different issues (no ID conflicts)\n- ✅ Just read back what they created\n- ✅ Don't depend on database state from other tests\n\nThey SHOULD share a database!\n\n## Real Numbers\n\nCurrent:\n- 279 tests × (create dir + init SQLite + migrations) = **8 minutes**\n\nAfter fix:\n- 10 test suites × (create dir + init SQLite + migrations) = **30 seconds**\n- 279 subtests running in parallel using those 10 DBs = **5 seconds**\n\n**Total: ~35 seconds instead of 8 minutes!**\n\n## Implementation Plan\n\n1. **Group related tests** into suites (Create, List, Update, Delete, etc.)\n2. **One setup per suite** instead of per test\n3. **Use t.Run() for subtests** with t.Parallel()\n4. **Keep tests that actually need isolation** separate (export/import tests, git operations)\n\nThis is way better than shuffling tests into folders!","notes":"## Progress Update (2025-11-21)\n\n✅ **Completed**:\n- Audited all 280 tests, created TEST_SUITE_AUDIT.md ([deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:bd-c49]]]]]]])\n- Refactored create_test.go to shared DB pattern ([deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:bd-y6d]]]]]]])\n- Proven the pattern works: 11 tests now run in 0.04s with 1 DB instead of 11\n\n❌ **Current Reality**:\n- Overall test suite: Still 8+ minutes (no meaningful change)\n- Only 1 of 76 test files refactored\n- Saved ~10 DB initializations out of 280\n\n## Acceptance Criteria (REALISTIC)\n\nThis task is NOT complete until:\n- [ ] All P1 files refactored (create ✅, dep, stale, comments, list, ready)\n- [ ] Test suite runs in \u003c 2 minutes\n- [ ] Measured and verified actual speedup\n\n## Next Steps\n\n1. Refactor remaining 5 P1 files: dep_test.go, stale_test.go, comments_test.go, list_test.go, ready_test.go\n2. Measure actual time improvement after each file\n3. Continue with P2 files if needed to hit \u003c2min target","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-21T11:37:47.886207-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:38:54.185364-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:38:54.185364-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-1w6i","content_hash":"fe84c359585b8726dcde3a15a85a32aa1a134cc40f9b803089e89b852436ad3b","title":"Document blocked_issues_cache architecture and behavior","description":"Add comprehensive documentation about the blocked_issues_cache optimization to help future maintainers understand the design.\n\n## What to document\n\n1. **Architecture overview**\n   - Why cache exists (performance: 752ms -\u003e 29ms)\n   - When cache is used (GetReadyWork queries)\n   - How cache is maintained (invalidation triggers)\n\n2. **Cache invalidation rules**\n   - Invalidated on: dependency add/remove (blocks/parent-child only)\n   - Invalidated on: any status change\n   - Invalidated on: issue close\n   - NOT invalidated on: related/discovered-from dependencies\n\n3. **Transaction safety**\n   - All invalidations happen within transactions\n   - Cache can use tx or direct db connection\n   - Rebuild is atomic (DELETE + INSERT in same tx)\n\n4. **Performance characteristics**\n   - Full rebuild on every invalidation\n   - Rebuild is fast (\u003c50ms on 10K database)\n   - Write complexity traded for read speed\n   - Dependency changes are rare vs reads\n\n5. **Edge cases**\n   - Parent-child transitive blocking\n   - Closed issues don't block\n   - Foreign key CASCADE handles deletions\n\n## Where to document\n\nAdd to these locations:\n\n1. **blocked_cache.go** - Add detailed package comment:\n```go\n// Package blocked_cache implements the blocked_issues_cache optimization.\n// \n// Performance: GetReadyWork originally used recursive CTE (752ms on 10K db).\n// With cache: Simple NOT EXISTS query (29ms on 10K db).\n//\n// Cache Maintenance:\n// - Rebuild triggered on dependency changes (blocks/parent-child only)\n// - Rebuild triggered on status changes  \n// - Full rebuild (DELETE + INSERT) is fast enough for all cases\n// ...\n```\n\n2. **ARCHITECTURE.md** or **PERFORMANCE.md** (new file) - High-level overview\n\n3. **ready.go** - Update comment at line 84-85 with more detail\n\n## Related\n\n- [deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:bd-5qim]]]]]]: GetReadyWork optimization (implemented)\n- bd-13gm: Cache validation tests\n- [deleted:[deleted:[deleted:[deleted:bd-obdc]]]]: Cache rebuild command","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-23T20:07:23.467296-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T22:38:46.782218-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-379","content_hash":"d1edf5009291680270e9bad61ef0d6e80fe1e24fa90f71fc80748a8bd52b32d2","title":"Implement `bd setup cursor` for Cursor IDE integration","description":"Create a `bd setup cursor` command that integrates Beads workflow into Cursor IDE via .cursorrules file. Unlike Claude Code (which has hooks), Cursor uses a static rules file to provide context to its AI.","design":"## Implementation\n\nCreate `cursor` subcommand in `cmd/bd/setup.go` that manages `.cursorrules` integration:\n\n### Command Interface\n```bash\nbd setup cursor           # Install/update Cursor integration\nbd setup cursor --check   # Verify .cursorrules has bd section\nbd setup cursor --remove  # Remove bd section from .cursorrules\n```\n\n### Behavior\n\n**If `.cursorrules` doesn't exist:**\n- Create new file with complete bd rules template\n- Mark sections for easy identification\n\n**If `.cursorrules` exists:**\n- Check if bd section already exists (look for marker comments)\n- If not exists: append bd section\n- If exists: update in place (preserve user customizations outside bd section)\n- Backup original with `.cursorrules.backup` suffix\n\n### .cursorrules Template\n\n```markdown\n# Beads Issue Tracking\n# Auto-generated by 'bd setup cursor' - do not remove these markers\n# BEGIN BEADS INTEGRATION\n\nThis project uses [Beads (bd)](https://github.com/steveyegge/beads) for issue tracking.\n\n## Core Rules\n- Track ALL work in bd (never use markdown TODOs or comment-based task lists)\n- Use `bd ready` to find available work\n- Use `bd create` to track new issues/tasks/bugs\n- Use `bd sync` at end of session to sync with git remote\n- Git hooks auto-sync on commit/merge\n\n## Quick Reference\n```bash\nbd prime                              # Load complete workflow context\nbd ready                              # Show issues ready to work (no blockers)\nbd list --status=open                 # List all open issues\nbd create --title=\"...\" --type=task  # Create new issue\nbd update \u003cid\u003e --status=in_progress  # Claim work\nbd close \u003cid\u003e                         # Mark complete\nbd dep \u003cfrom\u003e \u003cto\u003e                    # Add dependency (from blocks to)\nbd sync                               # Sync with git remote\n```\n\n## Workflow\n1. Check for ready work: `bd ready`\n2. Claim an issue: `bd update \u003cid\u003e --status=in_progress`\n3. Do the work\n4. Mark complete: `bd close \u003cid\u003e`\n5. Sync: `bd sync` (or let git hooks handle it)\n\n## Context Loading\nRun `bd prime` to get complete workflow documentation in AI-optimized format (~1-2k tokens).\n\nFor detailed docs: see AGENTS.md, QUICKSTART.md, or run `bd --help`\n\n# END BEADS INTEGRATION\n```\n\n### Detection Logic\n\n```go\nfunc setupCursor() error {\n    cursorRulesPath := \".cursorrules\"\n    \n    // Check if file exists\n    content, err := os.ReadFile(cursorRulesPath)\n    if err != nil {\n        if os.IsNotExist(err) {\n            // Create new file\n            return createCursorRules(cursorRulesPath)\n        }\n        return err\n    }\n    \n    // Check if bd section exists\n    if hasBeadsSection(string(content)) {\n        // Update existing section\n        return updateBeadsSection(cursorRulesPath, string(content))\n    } else {\n        // Append new section\n        return appendBeadsSection(cursorRulesPath, string(content))\n    }\n}\n\nfunc hasBeadsSection(content string) bool {\n    return strings.Contains(content, \"BEGIN BEADS INTEGRATION\")\n}\n```\n\n## Files\n- `cmd/bd/setup.go` - Add cursor subcommand\n- `cmd/bd/setup_cursor.go` - Cursor-specific logic\n- `cmd/bd/setup_cursor_test.go` - Tests\n- Template stored as Go string constant\n\n## Differences from Claude Setup\n\n| Aspect | Claude | Cursor |\n|--------|--------|--------|\n| **Integration file** | `.claude/commands/`, `.claude/hooks/` | `.cursorrules` |\n| **Auto-refresh** | Hooks call `bd prime` | Static rules (manual refresh) |\n| **Setup complexity** | Multiple files | Single file |\n| **Update frequency** | Dynamic (hooks) | Static (updated via `bd setup cursor`) |","acceptance_criteria":"- `bd setup cursor` creates/updates .cursorrules\n- Idempotent (safe to run multiple times)\n- Preserves non-bd content in .cursorrules\n- Backs up existing .cursorrules before modifying\n- `bd setup cursor --check` verifies integration\n- Markers allow updating bd section without affecting user content\n- Unit tests for template insertion/update logic\n- Documentation in AGENTS.md mentions Cursor setup","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-11T23:32:22.170083-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-11T23:32:22.170083-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-3852","content_hash":"bc2640e4d1c60e0b7a7c3b6d49cb05292f50facb5d4ea3887ba8c414aa7ffef3","title":"Add orphan detection migration","description":"Create migration to detect orphaned children in existing databases. Query: SELECT id FROM issues WHERE id LIKE '%.%' AND substr(id, 1, instr(id || '.', '.') - 1) NOT IN (SELECT id FROM issues). Log results, let user decide action (delete orphans or convert to top-level).","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T12:32:30.727044-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T12:32:30.727044-08:00","source_repo":"."}
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
 {"id":"bd-4aao","content_hash":"67e1bab2ec59b16ea0daf6220b137588a6704793584663d1cf6d58765d41437e","title":"Fix failing integration tests in beads-mcp","description":"The `beads-mcp` test suite has failures in `tests/test_bd_client_integration.py` (assertion error in `test_init_creates_beads_directory`) and errors in `tests/test_worktree_separate_dbs.py` (setup failures finding database). These need to be investigated and fixed to ensure a reliable CI baseline.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-20T18:53:28.4803-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T18:53:28.4803-05:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-4h3","content_hash":"c31e267da6b7885e45562d6b1d9176a4ea8603de218f7ffd361226e7268d283e","title":"Add test coverage for internal/git package","description":"","design":"Git package has 1 test file. Critical package needs comprehensive testing. Target: 70% coverage","acceptance_criteria":"- At least 4 test files\n- Package coverage \u003e= 70%\n- Tests cover git commands, error handling","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:23.497486-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:23.497486-05:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-4h3","depends_on_id":"bd-ge7","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:31.277639-05:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
 {"id":"bd-581b80b3","content_hash":"04c4d952852ae2673e551d9776698c52b0189754ac5f9ca295bed464a5b86a43","title":"bd find-duplicates - AI-powered duplicate detection","description":"Find semantically duplicate issues.\n\nApproaches:\n1. Mechanical: Exact title/description matching\n2. Embeddings: Cosine similarity (cheap, scalable)\n3. AI: LLM-based semantic comparison (expensive, accurate)\n\nUses embeddings by default for \u003e100 issues.\n\nFiles: cmd/bd/find_duplicates.go (new)","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T20:49:49.126801-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:20:41.046092-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:20:41.046092-08:00","source_repo":"."}
-{"id":"bd-5a90","content_hash":"819c14b3bb55fcd113b4e848e4bfcb0c3475756658575dba8d34922ca8e14077","title":"Test parent issue","description":"","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T11:50:35.85367-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T11:50:35.85367-08:00","source_repo":"."}
-{"id":"bd-5b6e","content_hash":"f82a86b4aae21311f23c8511a242f16e96d03836300995fadd43b8bea945cefa","title":"Add tests for helper functions (GetDirtyIssueHash, GetAllDependencyRecords, export hashes)","description":"Several utility functions have 0% coverage:\n- GetDirtyIssueHash (dirty.go)\n- GetAllDependencyRecords (dependencies.go)\n- GetExportHash, SetExportHash, ClearAllExportHashes (hash.go)\n\nThese are lower priority but should have basic coverage.","status":"open","priority":4,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-01T22:40:58.989976-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-01T22:40:58.989976-07:00","source_repo":"."}
-{"id":"bd-5ibn","content_hash":"3e651d081ea1dec7e5e30aaa2f9f521f3b9eaff7832d0dd55e5e6f89525f6b94","title":"Latency test 1","description":"","notes":"Resetting stale in_progress status from old executor run (yesterday)","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-20T12:16:30.703754-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-21T15:11:55.187258-05:00","source_repo":"."}
+{"id":"bd-5a90","content_hash":"819c14b3bb55fcd113b4e848e4bfcb0c3475756658575dba8d34922ca8e14077","title":"Test parent issue","description":"","status":"closed","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T11:50:35.85367-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:35:06.724333-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:35:06.724333-08:00","source_repo":"."}
+{"id":"bd-5b6e","content_hash":"f82a86b4aae21311f23c8511a242f16e96d03836300995fadd43b8bea945cefa","title":"Add tests for helper functions (GetDirtyIssueHash, GetAllDependencyRecords, export hashes)","description":"Several utility functions have 0% coverage:\n- GetDirtyIssueHash (dirty.go)\n- GetAllDependencyRecords (dependencies.go)\n- GetExportHash, SetExportHash, ClearAllExportHashes (hash.go)\n\nThese are lower priority but should have basic coverage.","status":"closed","priority":4,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-01T22:40:58.989976-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:39:01.556131-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:39:01.556131-08:00","source_repo":"."}
+{"id":"bd-5ibn","content_hash":"3e651d081ea1dec7e5e30aaa2f9f521f3b9eaff7832d0dd55e5e6f89525f6b94","title":"Latency test 1","description":"","notes":"Resetting stale in_progress status from old executor run (yesterday)","status":"closed","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-20T12:16:30.703754-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:35:05.255017-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:35:05.255017-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-736d","content_hash":"4743b1f41ff07fee3daa63240f0d5f7ac3f876e928b22c4ce0bee2cdf544e53a","title":"Refactor path canonicalization into helper function","description":"The path canonicalization logic (filepath.Abs + EvalSymlinks) is duplicated in 3 places:\n- beads.go:131-137 (BEADS_DIR handling)\n- cmd/bd/main.go:446-451 (--no-db cleanup)\n- cmd/bd/nodb.go:26-31 (--no-db initialization)\n\nRefactoring suggestion:\nExtract to a helper function like:\n  func canonicalizePath(path string) string\n\nThis would:\n- Reduce code duplication\n- Make the logic easier to maintain\n- Ensure consistent behavior across all path handling\n\nRelated to bd-e16b implementation.","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"chore","created_at":"2025-11-02T18:33:47.727443-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T18:33:47.727443-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-77gm","content_hash":"b227320f0cf0c889a1e0d617922c572a48eee563c9afb1662b44a22e183c0c80","title":"Import reports misleading '0 created, 0 updated' when actually importing all issues","description":"When running 'bd import' on a fresh database (no existing issues), the command reports 'Import complete: 0 created, 0 updated' even though it successfully imported all issues from the JSONL file.\n\n**Steps to reproduce:**\n1. Delete .beads/beads.db\n2. Run: bd import .beads/issues.jsonl\n3. Observe output: 'Import complete: 0 created, 0 updated'\n4. Run: bd list\n5. Confirm: All issues are actually present in the database\n\n**Expected behavior:**\nReport the actual number of issues imported, e.g., 'Import complete: 523 created, 0 updated'\n\n**Actual behavior:**\n'Import complete: 0 created, 0 updated' (misleading - makes user think import failed)\n\n**Impact:**\n- Users think import failed when it succeeded\n- Confusing during database sync operations (e.g., after git pull)\n- Makes debugging harder (can't tell if import actually worked)\n\n**Context:**\nDiscovered during VC session when syncing database after git pull. The misleading message caused confusion about whether the database was properly synced with the canonical JSONL file.","acceptance_criteria":"- Import command reports accurate count of created/updated issues\n- Fresh database import shows 'N created' where N is the actual number\n- Update operations show 'N updated' where N is the actual number changed\n- Message clearly indicates success vs failure","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-09T16:20:13.191156-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-09T16:20:13.191156-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-81a","content_hash":"0f43da9e36bc3c5db20f302b82021377685a9425f519a36bab5a2cf1b85f13d8","title":"Add programmatic tip injection API","description":"Allow tips to be programmatically injected at runtime based on detected conditions. This enables dynamic tips (not just pre-defined ones) to be shown with custom priority and frequency.","design":"## API Design\n\nAdd to `cmd/bd/tips.go`:\n\n```go\n// InjectTip adds a dynamic tip to the registry at runtime\nfunc InjectTip(id, message string, priority int, frequency time.Duration, probability float64, condition func() bool) {\n    tipsMutex.Lock()\n    defer tipsMutex.Unlock()\n    \n    tips = append(tips, Tip{\n        ID:          id,\n        Condition:   condition,\n        Message:     message,\n        Frequency:   frequency,\n        Priority:    priority,\n        Probability: probability,\n    })\n}\n\n// RemoveTip removes a tip from the registry\nfunc RemoveTip(id string) {\n    tipsMutex.Lock()\n    defer tipsMutex.Unlock()\n    \n    for i, tip := range tips {\n        if tip.ID == id {\n            tips = append(tips[:i], tips[i+1:]...)\n            return\n        }\n    }\n}\n```\n\n## Use Cases\n\n### Example 1: Critical Security Update\n```go\n// In bd version check code\nif criticalSecurityUpdate {\n    InjectTip(\n        \"security_update\",\n        fmt.Sprintf(\"CRITICAL: Security update available (bd %s). Update immediately!\", remoteVersion),\n        100,         // Highest priority\n        0,           // No frequency limit\n        1.0,         // Always show (100% probability)\n        func() bool { return true },\n    )\n}\n```\n\n### Example 2: New Version Available\n```go\n// In bd version check code\nif remoteVersion \u003e currentVersion {\n    InjectTip(\n        \"upgrade_available\",\n        fmt.Sprintf(\"New bd version %s available (you have %s). Run: go install github.com/steveyegge/beads/cmd/bd@latest\", remoteVersion, currentVersion),\n        90,          // High priority\n        7 * 24 * time.Hour,  // Weekly\n        0.8,         // 80% probability (frequent but not always)\n        func() bool { return true },\n    )\n}\n```\n\n### Example 3: Large Issue Count Suggestion\n```go\n// In bd list code\nif issueCount \u003e 100 {\n    InjectTip(\n        \"use_filters\",\n        \"You have many issues. Use filters: 'bd list --status=open --priority=1'\",\n        50,          // Medium priority\n        14 * 24 * time.Hour,  // Bi-weekly\n        0.4,         // 40% probability (occasional suggestion)\n        func() bool { return true },\n    )\n}\n```\n\n### Example 4: No Dependencies Used\n```go\n// After analyzing project\nif hasIssues \u0026\u0026 noDependenciesCreated {\n    InjectTip(\n        \"try_dependencies\",\n        \"Try using dependencies: 'bd dep \u003cissue\u003e \u003cblocks-issue\u003e' to track blockers\",\n        30,          // Low priority\n        30 * 24 * time.Hour,  // Monthly\n        0.3,         // 30% probability (low-key suggestion)\n        func() bool { return true },\n    )\n}\n```\n\n## Probability Guidelines\n\n- **1.0 (100%)**: Critical security, breaking changes, data loss prevention\n- **0.7-0.9 (70-90%)**: Important updates, major new features\n- **0.4-0.6 (40-60%)**: General tips, workflow improvements, feature discovery\n- **0.1-0.3 (10-30%)**: Nice-to-know features, advanced tips, optional optimizations\n\n## Thread Safety\n- Use mutex to protect tip registry\n- Safe for concurrent command execution\n- Deterministic testing via BEADS_TIP_SEED env var","acceptance_criteria":"- InjectTip() API exists and is documented\n- RemoveTip() API exists\n- Thread-safe with mutex protection\n- Can inject tips from any command\n- Injected tips participate in priority/frequency rotation\n- Unit tests for injection API\n- Example usage in code comments","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-11T23:29:46.645583-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-11T23:50:12.209135-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-81a","depends_on_id":"bd-d4i","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-11T23:29:46.646327-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 {"id":"bd-9e23","content_hash":"fa94af8126d5d8c816a6f83d5ad191ebdb954687abb87ce30e4f67eee4f1a9ce","title":"Optimize Memory backend GetIssueByExternalRef with index","description":"Currently GetIssueByExternalRef in Memory storage uses O(n) linear search through all issues.\n\nCurrent code (memory.go:282-308):\nfor _, issue := range m.issues {\n    if issue.ExternalRef != nil \u0026\u0026 *issue.ExternalRef == externalRef {\n        return \u0026issueCopy, nil\n    }\n}\n\nProposed optimization:\n- Add externalRefToID map[string]string to MemoryStorage\n- Maintain it in CreateIssue, UpdateIssue, DeleteIssue\n- Achieve O(1) lookup like SQLite's index\n\nImpact: Low (--no-db mode typically has smaller datasets)\nRelated: bd-1022","status":"open","priority":4,"issue_type":"chore","created_at":"2025-11-02T15:32:30.242357-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T15:32:30.242357-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-9li4","content_hash":"7ae7b885e82a2de333584c01f690dbc3ecb924603f18e316f5c91cc44e2256f8","title":"Create Docker image for Agent Mail","description":"Containerize Agent Mail server for easy deployment.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n- Dockerfile with Python 3.14\n- Health check endpoint\n- Volume mount for storage\n- Environment variable configuration\n- Multi-arch builds (amd64, arm64)\n\nFile: deployment/agent-mail/Dockerfile","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.231964-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.231964-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-9lwr","content_hash":"1fe4b1e3a507ef7f658edbcf02d5c72efd2ff1070ff0947da6e6159bf9ce8541","title":"Document inconsistent error handling strategy across codebase","description":"**Scope:** Cross-cutting pattern across cmd/bd (create.go, init.go, sync.go, daemon_sync.go)\n\n**Issue:** Three different error handling patterns used inconsistently:\n\n**Pattern A: Exit immediately**\n```go\nif err := store.CreateIssue(...) {\n    fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, \"Error: %v\\n\", err)\n    os.Exit(1)\n}\n```\n\n**Pattern B: Warn and continue**\n```go\nif err := createConfigYaml(...) {\n    fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, \"Warning: %v\\n\", err)\n    // Non-fatal - continue anyway\n}\n```\n\n**Pattern C: Silent ignore**\n```go\n_ = store.Close()\n```\n\n**Impact:**\n- Makes error handling non-deterministic\n- Hard to test error paths\n- Inconsistent user experience\n\n**Task:**\n1. Document when each pattern should be used\n2. Add decision tree/flowchart to developer docs\n3. Consider creating error handling helpers to enforce consistency\n4. Audit codebase and refactor outliers","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-23T19:46:52.861673-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T19:46:52.861673-08:00","source_repo":"."}
-{"id":"bd-9msn","content_hash":"69ef2ebc5a847eb407c37e9039391d8ebc761a4cee3b60537de4f5a12011bec3","title":"Add monitoring and alerting","description":"Observability for production Agent Mail server.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n- Health check endpoint (/health)\n- Prometheus metrics export\n- Grafana dashboard\n- Alerts for server downtime\n- Alerts for high error rate\n- Log aggregation config\n\nFile: deployment/agent-mail/monitoring/","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.354117-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.354117-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-9msn","depends_on_id":"bd-z3s3","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-07T23:04:28.050074-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
+{"id":"bd-9msn","content_hash":"69ef2ebc5a847eb407c37e9039391d8ebc761a4cee3b60537de4f5a12011bec3","title":"Add monitoring and alerting","description":"Observability for production Agent Mail server.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n- Health check endpoint (/health)\n- Prometheus metrics export\n- Grafana dashboard\n- Alerts for server downtime\n- Alerts for high error rate\n- Log aggregation config\n\nFile: deployment/agent-mail/monitoring/","status":"closed","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.354117-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:38:56.81073-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:38:56.81073-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-9msn","depends_on_id":"bd-z3s3","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-07T23:04:28.050074-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
 {"id":"bd-afd","content_hash":"fbd5cfa6509144a3650092f743b61f5301926f4086962879290a8478f8dcbcc0","title":"bd doctor --fix should auto-fix metadata.json jsonl_export mismatch","description":"## Root Cause\n\nThe version tracking code (cmd/bd/version_tracking.go:33-38) auto-recreates metadata.json using DefaultConfig() if it doesn't exist. DefaultConfig() hardcodes jsonl_export to 'issues.jsonl', but many repos (including beads itself) use 'beads.jsonl'.\n\nWhen metadata.json goes missing (git clean, merge conflict, rebase, etc.), the next bd command recreates it with the wrong filename, causing a mismatch with the actual JSONL file.\n\n## Impact\n\nThis affects ANY user whose metadata.json gets deleted and who uses a non-default JSONL filename. Normal git operations can trigger this.\n\n## Fix Requirements\n\n1. bd doctor --fix should auto-detect and fix the mismatch (check which .jsonl file exists, update metadata.json)\n2. Version tracking should detect actual JSONL file instead of using hardcoded default\n3. DefaultConfig() should scan for existing .jsonl files before defaulting\n4. Daemon should auto-detect config changes without restart\n\n## Related Code\n\n- internal/configfile/configfile.go:18-23 (DefaultConfig hardcodes issues.jsonl)\n- cmd/bd/version_tracking.go:33-38 (auto-creates config with default)  \n- internal/beads/beads.go:245-246 (FindJSONLPath defaults to issues.jsonl)","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-23T22:57:34.03414-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:11:15.270911-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:11:15.270911-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-b0c8","content_hash":"87b423a42d509b9405b52b089b2ba92b33a90ad472d6d9094986b48715399a99","title":"Research hooks/skills approach for enforcing issue descriptions","description":"## Solution: Hooks/Skills (mentioned in discussion)\n\nResearch the hooks/skills system mentioned by riordanpawley in discussion #366:\nhttps://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/s/wrn2tjkMHX\n\n## Investigation Tasks\n\n1. Review the Reddit post to understand the approach\n2. Determine if beads hooks can enforce validation\n3. Check if Claude Code skills/hooks can intercept MCP calls\n4. Assess feasibility and user burden\n\n## Notes\n\nFrom discussion #366:\n\u003e I'm using a skills/hooks system to get Claude to do that kind of thing right similar to https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/s/wrn2tjkMHX\n\nThis might be a client-side solution rather than server-side.\n\n## Deliverable\n\nDocument findings in issue notes, with recommendation on whether to pursue this approach.","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-23T14:01:01.57079-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T14:01:01.57079-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-b55e2ac2","content_hash":"44122b61b1dcd06407ecf36f57577ea72c5df6dc8cc2a8c1b173b37d16a10267","title":"Fix autoimport tests for content-hash collision scoring","description":"## Overview\nThree autoimport tests are failing after bd-cbed9619.4 because they expect behavior based on the old reference-counting collision resolution, but the system now uses deterministic content-hash scoring.\n\n## Failing Tests\n1. `TestAutoImportMultipleCollisionsRemapped` - expects local versions preserved\n2. `TestAutoImportAllCollisionsRemapped` - expects local versions preserved  \n3. `TestAutoImportCollisionRemapMultipleFields` - expects specific collision resolution behavior\n\n## Root Cause\nThese tests were written when ScoreCollisions used reference counting to determine which version to keep. Now it uses content-hash comparison (introduced in commit 2e87329), which produces different but deterministic results.\n\n## Example\nOld behavior: Issue with more references would be kept\nNew behavior: Issue with lexicographically lower content hash is kept\n\n## Solution\nUpdate each test to:\n1. Verify the new content-hash based behavior is correct\n2. Check that the remapped issue (not necessarily local/remote) has the expected content\n3. Ensure dependencies are preserved on the correct remapped issue\n\n## Acceptance Criteria\n- All three autoimport tests pass\n- Tests verify content-hash determinism (same collision always resolves the same way)\n- Tests check dependency preservation on remapped issues\n- Test documentation explains content-hash scoring expectations\n\n## Files to Modify\n- `cmd/bd/autoimport_collision_test.go`\n\n## Testing\nRun: `go test ./cmd/bd -run \"TestAutoImport.*Collision\" -v`","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T19:17:28.358028-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:20:43.995595-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:20:43.995595-08:00","source_repo":"."}
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 {"id":"bd-e1085716","content_hash":"6b1f867ab07cbed86eae8ab342995691aac5b2bfe8fa6cdb869209e81f157d4e","title":"bd validate - Comprehensive health check","description":"Run all validation checks in one command.\n\nChecks:\n- Duplicates\n- Orphaned dependencies\n- Test pollution\n- Git conflicts\n\nSupports --fix-all for auto-repair.\n\nDepends on bd-cbed9619.1, bd-0dcea000, bd-31aab707, bd-9826b69a.\n\nFiles: cmd/bd/validate.go (new)","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T23:05:13.980679-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:20:39.694984-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:20:39.694984-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-e166","content_hash":"000f4f9d069ffedceae13894d967ec30fa4a89e318bfcac4847f3c3b16d44a89","title":"Improve timestamp comparison readability in import","description":"The timestamp comparison logic uses double-negative which can be confusing:\n\nCurrent code:\nif !incoming.UpdatedAt.After(existing.UpdatedAt) {\n    // skip update\n}\n\nMore readable:\nif incoming.UpdatedAt.After(existing.UpdatedAt) {\n    // perform update\n} else {\n    // skip (local is newer)\n}\n\nThis is a minor refactor for code clarity.\n\nRelated: bd-1022\nFiles: internal/importer/importer.go:411, 488","status":"open","priority":4,"issue_type":"chore","created_at":"2025-11-02T15:32:12.27108-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T15:32:12.27108-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-e92","content_hash":"12073b3293b06f99051bc9c00188aeb520cd2e4792cf4694f1fa4b784e625e54","title":"Add test coverage for internal/autoimport package","description":"","design":"The autoimport package has only 1 test file. Need comprehensive tests. Target: 70% coverage","acceptance_criteria":"- At least 3 test files\n- Package coverage \u003e= 70%\n- Tests cover main functionality, error paths, edge cases","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:22.338577-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:22.338577-05:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-e92","depends_on_id":"bd-ge7","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:31.128625-05:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
-{"id":"bd-g9eu","content_hash":"79fe2f96d06e3f0750b55f323bc104b02de6ab8a745e0bd36cf3425e125af89c","title":"Investigate TestRoutingIntegration failure","description":"TestRoutingIntegration/maintainer_with_SSH_remote failed during pre-commit check with \"expected role maintainer, got contributor\".\nThis occurred while running `go test -short ./...` on darwin/arm64.\nThe failure appears unrelated to storage/sqlite changes.\nNeed to investigate if this is a flaky test or environmental issue.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-20T15:55:19.337094-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T15:55:19.337094-08:00","source_repo":"."}
+{"id":"bd-g9eu","content_hash":"79fe2f96d06e3f0750b55f323bc104b02de6ab8a745e0bd36cf3425e125af89c","title":"Investigate TestRoutingIntegration failure","description":"TestRoutingIntegration/maintainer_with_SSH_remote failed during pre-commit check with \"expected role maintainer, got contributor\".\nThis occurred while running `go test -short ./...` on darwin/arm64.\nThe failure appears unrelated to storage/sqlite changes.\nNeed to investigate if this is a flaky test or environmental issue.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-20T15:55:19.337094-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:38:55.477369-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:38:55.477369-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-ge7","content_hash":"84248781654b9924e1f4284058f141b73d761dead05ef9a3d1cc9b9f8cd4b60d","title":"Improve Beads test coverage from 46% to 80%","description":"","design":"Currently at 46% test coverage. Need to systematically improve coverage across all subsystems, focusing first on packages with minimal or no tests.\n\nTarget: 80% overall coverage\n\nApproach:\n- Break down by subsystem (internal/* packages)\n- Prioritize packages with 0-1 test files\n- Each child issue targets specific coverage goals\n- Focus on unit tests for core logic, error paths, and edge cases\n\nThis epic will be executed by the VC executor to test its ability to handle sustained multi-issue work.","acceptance_criteria":"- Overall test coverage reaches 80% or higher\n- All internal/* packages have at least 60% coverage\n- All packages with only 1 test file now have at least 3 test files\n- Quality gates (go test, golangci-lint) pass\n- Tests are maintainable and test actual behavior, not implementation details","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:03.700271-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:03.700271-05:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-gqo","content_hash":"21642505de8036d9501f8593b78de7b761f05869f9d8d11758278e9c0b33c9c3","title":"Implement health checks in daemon event loop","description":"Add health checks to checkDaemonHealth() function in daemon_event_loop.go:170:\n- Database integrity check\n- Disk space check\n- Memory usage check\n\nCurrently it's just a no-op placeholder.","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-21T18:55:07.534304-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-21T18:55:07.534304-05:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-hdt","content_hash":"8e6cf1653ef2ea583b39a421b3d708763ab7c042d6cd494e77202a92af0a7398","title":"Implement auto-merge functionality in duplicates command","description":"The duplicates.go file has a TODO at line 95 to implement the performMerge function for automatic duplicate merging. Currently it just prints a warning message. This would automate the merge process instead of just suggesting commands.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-21T18:55:02.828619-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-21T18:55:02.828619-05:00","source_repo":"."}
@@ -60,5 +60,5 @@
 {"id":"bd-wcl","content_hash":"c08d62ce3627a49126c63f6a630a08c1666e5b1b8d9148ae0c72d7d06611b2a9","title":"Document CLI + hooks as recommended approach over MCP","description":"Update documentation to position CLI + bd prime hooks as the primary recommended approach over MCP server, explaining why minimizing context matters even with large context windows (compute cost, energy, environment, latency).","design":"## Goals\n\nPosition CLI + `bd prime` hooks as the **primary recommended approach** for AI agent integration, with MCP server as a legacy/fallback option.\n\nExplore **hybrid mode** - if certain commands benefit from MCP (UX/DX advantages like no approval prompts), minimize MCP surface area to only those commands.\n\nThis requires production validation first - only update docs after CLI mode is proven reliable.\n\n## Why Minimize Context (Even With Large Windows)\n\n**Context window size ≠ free resource**\n\nLarge context windows (100k+, 200k+) don't mean we should fill them wastefully. Every token in context has real costs:\n\n### Compute Cost\n- **Processing overhead**: Larger context = more GPU/CPU cycles per request\n- **Memory usage**: 10.5k tokens consume significant RAM/VRAM\n- **Scaling impact**: Multiplied across all users, all sessions, all requests\n\n### Energy \u0026 Environment\n- **Electricity**: More compute = more power consumption\n- **Carbon footprint**: Data centers running on grid power (not all renewable)\n- **Sustainability**: Unnecessary token usage contributes to AI's environmental impact\n- **Responsibility**: Efficient tools are better for the planet\n\n### User Experience\n- **Latency**: Larger context = slower processing (noticeable at 10k+ tokens)\n- **Cost**: Many AI services charge per token (input + output)\n- **Rate limits**: Context counts against API quotas\n\n### Engineering Excellence\n- **Efficiency**: Good engineering minimizes resource usage\n- **Scalability**: Efficient tools scale better\n- **Best practices**: Optimize for the common case\n\n**The comparison:**\n\n| Approach | Standing Context | Efficiency | User Cost | Environmental Impact |\n|----------|-----------------|------------|-----------|---------------------|\n| **CLI + hooks** | ~1-2k tokens | 80-90% reduction | Lower | Sustainable ✓ |\n| **MCP minimal** | ~2-4k tokens | 60-80% reduction | Medium | Better ✓ |\n| **MCP full** | ~10.5k tokens | Baseline | Higher | Wasteful ✗ |\n\n**Functional equivalence:**\n- CLI via Bash tool works just as well as MCP native calls\n- Same features, same reliability\n- No downside except initial learning curve\n\n## Hybrid Mode: Minimal MCP Surface Area\n\n**Philosophy:** MCP server doesn't have to expose everything.\n\nIf certain commands have legitimate UX/DX benefits from MCP (e.g., no approval prompts, cleaner syntax), we can expose ONLY those commands via MCP while using CLI for everything else.\n\n### Potential MCP-Only Candidates (TBD)\n\nCommands that might benefit from MCP native calls:\n- `ready` - frequently checked, no side effects, approval prompt annoying\n- `show` - read-only, frequently used, approval slows workflow\n- `list` - read-only, no risk, approval adds friction\n\nCommands that work fine via CLI:\n- `create` - complex parameters, benefits from explicit confirmation\n- `update` - state changes, good to see command explicitly\n- `close` - state changes, explicit is better\n- `dep` - relationships, good to see what's being linked\n- `sync` - git operations, definitely want visibility\n\n### Token Budget\n\n**Full MCP** (current): ~10.5k tokens\n- All ~20+ bd commands exposed\n- All parameter schemas\n- All descriptions and examples\n\n**Minimal MCP** (proposed): ~2-4k tokens\n- 3-5 high-frequency read commands only\n- Simplified schemas\n- Minimal descriptions\n- Everything else via CLI\n\n**Pure CLI**: ~1-2k tokens (only on SessionStart/PreCompact)\n- No MCP tools loaded\n- All commands via Bash\n\n### Investigation Required\n\nBefore implementing hybrid mode, validate:\n\n1. **Do MCP calls actually skip approval prompts?**\n   - Test with Claude Code approval settings\n   - Compare MCP tool calls vs Bash tool calls\n   - Measure UX difference in real usage\n\n2. **What's the actual token breakdown per command?**\n   - Measure individual command schemas\n   - Calculate token savings for minimal vs full\n\n3. **Is approval prompt the only benefit?**\n   - Are there other UX advantages to MCP?\n   - Does native syntax actually improve experience?\n   - User testing with both approaches\n\n4. **Can we dynamically load MCP tools?**\n   - Only load MCP when certain commands needed?\n   - Hot-swap between CLI and MCP?\n   - Probably not - MCP loads at startup\n\n### Hybrid Mode Documentation (If Validated)\n\n```markdown\n## Choosing Your Integration Approach\n\nBeads supports three AI agent integration approaches:\n\n### CLI + Hooks (Recommended - Most Efficient)\n\n**Setup:** `bd setup claude`\n\nUses Claude Code hooks to inject workflow context via `bd prime` command. Agent uses bd via Bash tool.\n\n**Tokens:** ~1-2k (on SessionStart/PreCompact only)\n\n**Pros:**\n- Maximum efficiency (80-90% reduction vs full MCP)\n- Lowest compute/energy usage\n- Same functionality as MCP\n\n**Cons:**\n- Bash tool calls may require approval prompts\n- Slightly more verbose in conversation\n\n### Minimal MCP + Hooks (Balanced)\n\n**Setup:** Install minimal MCP server (read-only commands) + `bd setup claude`\n\nExposes only high-frequency read commands via MCP (ready, show, list). Everything else via CLI.\n\n**Tokens:** ~2-4k MCP + ~1-2k hooks\n\n**Pros:**\n- 60-80% reduction vs full MCP\n- No approval prompts for common queries\n- Cleaner syntax for frequent operations\n- Still efficient\n\n**Cons:**\n- Requires MCP server (additional setup)\n- Mixed interface (some MCP, some CLI)\n\n### Full MCP + Hooks (Legacy)\n\n**Setup:** Install full MCP server + `bd setup claude`\n\n**Tokens:** ~10.5k MCP + hooks\n\n**Pros:**\n- All commands as native function calls\n- Consistent interface\n\n**Cons:**\n- Highest token usage (worst for compute/energy/cost)\n- Slowest processing\n- Less sustainable\n\n### Recommendation\n\n1. **Start with CLI + hooks** - most efficient, works great\n2. **Try minimal MCP** if approval prompts become annoying\n3. **Avoid full MCP** - wasteful with no significant benefit\n```\n\n## Production Validation Checklist\n\nBefore making these documentation changes, validate CLI approach works reliably:\n\n### Phase 1: Pure CLI Validation\n- [ ] `bd prime` implemented and tested\n- [ ] Hooks installed and working in Claude Code\n- [ ] Real-world usage by at least 2-3 developers for 1+ weeks\n- [ ] No significant usability issues reported\n- [ ] Agent successfully uses bd via Bash tool\n- [ ] Document which commands (if any) have approval prompt issues\n\n### Phase 2: Hybrid Mode Investigation (Optional)\n- [ ] Test if MCP calls skip approval prompts vs Bash calls\n- [ ] Measure token cost per MCP command\n- [ ] Identify minimal set of commands worth exposing via MCP\n- [ ] Build minimal MCP server variant\n- [ ] Validate token savings (should be 60-80% vs full MCP)\n- [ ] User testing shows actual UX improvement\n\n### Phase 3: Documentation Update\n- [ ] Update based on validation results\n- [ ] Include measured token counts (not estimates)\n- [ ] Provide clear migration paths\n- [ ] Update `bd doctor` recommendations\n\n## Migration Guide (Optional)\n\nFor users currently using MCP:\n\n```markdown\n### Migrating from Full MCP to CLI + Hooks\n\nAlready using full MCP server? You can switch to the more efficient CLI approach:\n\n1. Install hooks: `bd setup claude`\n2. Test it works (hooks inject context, agent uses Bash tool)\n3. Remove MCP server from `~/.claude/settings.json`\n4. Restart Claude Code\n\nYou'll get the same functionality with 80-90% less token usage.\n\n### Migrating to Minimal MCP (If Available)\n\nIf you find approval prompts annoying for certain commands:\n\n1. Replace full MCP with minimal MCP in `~/.claude/settings.json`\n2. Restart Claude Code\n3. Verify high-frequency commands (ready, show, list) work via MCP\n4. Everything else automatically uses CLI\n\nYou'll get 60-80% token reduction vs full MCP while keeping the UX benefits.\n```\n\n## Files to Update\n\n- `README.md` - Add recommendation in AI Integration section\n- `AGENTS.md` - Add \"Choosing Your Integration Approach\" section early\n- `QUICKSTART.md` - Update AI integration section\n- `docs/` - Any other AI integration docs if they exist\n- `mcp-server/` - Create minimal variant if hybrid validated\n\n## Future: Update `bd init`\n\nOnce validated, update `bd init` to:\n- Default to recommending `bd setup claude` (hooks only)\n- Mention minimal MCP as option for UX improvement\n- Detect existing full MCP and suggest migration\n- Provide token usage estimates for each approach\n\n## MCP Server Architecture Note\n\n**Key insight:** MCP server doesn't have to expose all bd functionality.\n\nCurrent design exposes ~20+ commands (all bd subcommands). This is over-engineered.\n\n**Better design:**\n- **Minimal MCP**: 3-5 read-only commands (~2-4k tokens)\n- **CLI**: Everything else via Bash tool\n- **Hooks**: Context injection via `bd prime`\n\nThis achieves best of both worlds:\n- Low token usage (efficient)\n- No approval prompts for common queries (UX)\n- Explicit visibility for state changes (safety)\n\nIf validation shows NO meaningful benefit to MCP (even minimal), skip hybrid mode entirely and recommend pure CLI.","acceptance_criteria":"- Documentation explains CLI + hooks as recommended approach\n- Explains why context size matters (compute/energy/cost/latency)\n- Token comparison table shows 80-90% reduction\n- Migration guide for existing MCP users\n- Only deployed AFTER production validation\n- Clear that both approaches are supported","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-12T00:15:25.923025-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-12T00:18:16.786857-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-ybv5","content_hash":"52f6d2143a3e9d63937e7dee2cfb4055740132d3c0831c3e948210179336820f","title":"Refactor AGENTS.md to use external references","description":"Suggestion to use external references (e.g., \"ALWAYS REFER TO ./beads/prompt.md\") instead of including all instructions directly within AGENTS.md.\nReasons:\n1. Agents can follow external references.\n2. Prevents context pollution/stuffing in AGENTS.md as more tools append instructions.\n","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-20T18:55:53.259144-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T18:55:53.259144-05:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-ye0d","content_hash":"40962ef4e144b58167a07ae13458b40cedff3f3549fccab3a172ca908cd754bc","title":"troubleshoot GH#278 daemon exits every few secs","description":"","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-13T06:27:23.39509215-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-13T06:27:23.39509215-07:00","source_repo":"."}
-{"id":"bd-z3s3","content_hash":"24d99dc1a9a5f35af962137f5709d4b0f1b6a9ec91511c30a2517d790640cce8","title":"Create deployment scripts for GCP","description":"Automated provisioning scripts for GCP Compute Engine deployment.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n- Terraform/gcloud scripts\n- Static IP allocation\n- Firewall rules\n- NGINX reverse proxy config\n- TLS setup (Let's Encrypt)\n- Systemd service file\n\nFile: deployment/agent-mail/gcp/","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.294839-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.294839-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-z3s3","depends_on_id":"bd-9li4","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-07T23:04:27.982336-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
+{"id":"bd-z3s3","content_hash":"24d99dc1a9a5f35af962137f5709d4b0f1b6a9ec91511c30a2517d790640cce8","title":"Create deployment scripts for GCP","description":"Automated provisioning scripts for GCP Compute Engine deployment.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n- Terraform/gcloud scripts\n- Static IP allocation\n- Firewall rules\n- NGINX reverse proxy config\n- TLS setup (Let's Encrypt)\n- Systemd service file\n\nFile: deployment/agent-mail/gcp/","status":"closed","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.294839-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-23T23:38:58.545006-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-23T23:38:58.545006-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-z3s3","depends_on_id":"bd-9li4","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-07T23:04:27.982336-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
 {"id":"bd-zj8e","content_hash":"655c761aaf4d5b0c9edfba7d96d23e608de94760148715667738d35c2033e110","title":"Performance Testing Documentation","description":"Create docs/performance-testing.md documenting the performance testing framework.\n\nSections:\n1. Overview - What the framework does, goals\n2. Running Benchmarks\n   - make bench command\n   - Running specific benchmarks\n   - Interpreting output (ns/op, allocs/op)\n3. Profiling and Analysis\n   - Viewing CPU profiles with pprof\n   - Reading flamegraphs\n   - Memory profiling\n   - Finding hotspots\n4. User Diagnostics\n   - bd doctor --perf usage\n   - Sharing profiles with bug reports\n   - Understanding the report output\n5. Comparing Performance\n   - Using benchstat for before/after comparisons\n   - Detecting regressions\n6. Tips for Optimization\n   - Common patterns\n   - When to profile vs benchmark\n\nStyle:\n- Concise, practical examples\n- Screenshots/examples of pprof output\n- Clear command-line examples\n- Focus on workflow, not theory","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-13T22:23:38.99897-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-13T22:23:38.99897-08:00","source_repo":"."}