johno/beads
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bd sync: 2025-11-05 19:03:47

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Steve Yegge
2025-11-05 19:03:47 -08:00
parent 9297cf118e
commit c20aabe263
1 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
.beads/beads.jsonl
View File

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
{"id":"bd-6bebe013","content_hash":"80a473ecbec089a83cb325346eb851661d0fe35a25c6d73fb92827abcfa36267","title":"Rapid 1","description":"","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T19:11:57.404437-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.189046-07:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-6fe4622f","content_hash":"d0d8e0634aea5e60373d339b363d7601af5d42d0f90780a54a4978c3e39ca747","title":"Remove unreachable utility functions","description":"Several small utility functions are unreachable:\n\nFiles to clean:\n1. `internal/storage/sqlite/hash.go` - `computeIssueContentHash` (line 17)\n - Check if entire file can be deleted if only contains this function\n\n2. `internal/config/config.go` - `FileUsed` (line 151)\n - Delete unused config helper\n\n3. `cmd/bd/git_sync_test.go` - `verifyIssueOpen` (line 300)\n - Delete dead test helper\n\n4. `internal/compact/haiku.go` - `HaikuClient.SummarizeTier2` (line 81)\n - Tier 2 summarization not implemented\n - Options: implement feature OR delete method\n\nImpact: Removes 50-100 LOC depending on decisions","acceptance_criteria":"- Remove unreachable functions\n- If entire files can be deleted (like hash.go), delete them\n- For SummarizeTier2: decide to implement or delete, document decision\n- All tests pass: `go test ./...`\n- Verify no callers exist for each function","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.434573-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.224957-07:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-6mjj","content_hash":"2226a78fdb09302679f4fd9424d4e8c8fbdef1ef374bdd3789471b4c0868358d","title":"Split test suites: fast vs. integration","description":"Reorganize tests into separate packages/files for fast unit tests vs slow integration tests.\n\nBenefits:\n- Clear separation of concerns\n- Easier to run just fast tests during development\n- Can parallelize CI jobs better\n\nFiles to organize:\n- beads_hash_multiclone_test.go (slow integration tests)\n- beads_integration_test.go (medium-speed integration tests)\n- Other test files (fast unit tests)","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:21.040347-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T10:38:12.408674-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-04T10:38:12.408674-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-6mjj","depends_on_id":"bd-l5gq","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:21.041228-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-6z7l","content_hash":"3b3d4e0a192c443fce78d76eab764e4a5339e1ad69b0dc285bdd928ab5d0c2db","title":"Auto-detect scenarios and prompt users","description":"Detect when user is in fork/contributor scenario and prompt with helpful suggestions. Check: git remote relationships, existing .beads config, repo ownership. Suggest appropriate wizard.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:30.070695-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:30.070695-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-6z7l","depends_on_id":"bd-8rd","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:39.205478-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-6z7l","content_hash":"3b3d4e0a192c443fce78d76eab764e4a5339e1ad69b0dc285bdd928ab5d0c2db","title":"Auto-detect scenarios and prompt users","description":"Detect when user is in fork/contributor scenario and prompt with helpful suggestions. Check: git remote relationships, existing .beads config, repo ownership. Suggest appropriate wizard.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:30.070695-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T18:57:03.315476-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T18:57:03.315476-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-6z7l","depends_on_id":"bd-8rd","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:39.205478-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-710a4916","content_hash":"5595ff0955a9ff4e738d4ba4fc87ca9aecd98ffcb694a4932ede8d6d76c5c76c","title":"CRDT-based architecture for guaranteed convergence (v2.0)","description":"## Vision\nRedesign beads around Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs) to provide mathematical guarantees for N-way collision resolution at arbitrary scale.\n\n## Current Limitations\n- Content-hash based collision resolution fails at 5+ clones\n- Non-deterministic convergence in multi-round scenarios\n- UNIQUE constraint violations during rename operations\n- No formal proof of convergence properties\n\n## CRDT Benefits\n- Provably convergent (Strong Eventual Consistency)\n- Commutative/Associative/Idempotent operations\n- No coordination required between clones\n- Scales to 100+ concurrent workers\n- Well-understood mathematical foundations\n\n## Proposed Architecture\n\n### 1. UUID-Based IDs\nReplace sequential IDs with UUIDs:\n- Current: bd-1c63eb84, bd-9063acda, bd-4d80b7b1\n- CRDT: bd-a1b2c3d4-e5f6-7890-abcd-ef1234567890\n- Human aliases maintained separately: #42 maps to UUID\n\n### 2. Last-Write-Wins (LWW) Elements\nEach field becomes an LWW register:\n- title: (timestamp, clone_id, value)\n- status: (timestamp, clone_id, value)\n- Deterministic conflict resolution via Lamport timestamp + clone_id tiebreaker\n\n### 3. Operation Log\nTrack all operations as CRDT ops:\n- CREATE(uuid, timestamp, clone_id, fields)\n- UPDATE(uuid, field, timestamp, clone_id, value)\n- DELETE(uuid, timestamp, clone_id) - tombstone, not hard delete\n\n### 4. Sync as Merge\nSyncing becomes merging two CRDT states:\n- No merge conflicts possible\n- Deterministic merge function\n- Guaranteed convergence\n\n## Implementation Phases\n\n### Phase 1: Research \u0026 Design (4 weeks)\n- Study existing CRDT implementations (Automerge, Yjs, Loro)\n- Design schema for CRDT-based issue tracking\n- Prototype LWW-based Issue CRDT\n- Benchmark performance vs current system\n\n### Phase 2: Parallel Implementation (6 weeks)\n- Implement CRDT storage layer alongside SQLite\n- Build conversion tools: SQLite ↔ CRDT\n- Maintain backward compatibility with v1.x format\n- Migration path for existing databases\n\n### Phase 3: Testing \u0026 Validation (4 weeks)\n- Formal verification of convergence properties\n- Stress testing with 100+ clone scenario\n- Performance profiling and optimization\n- Documentation and examples\n\n### Phase 4: Migration \u0026 Rollout (4 weeks)\n- Release v2.0-beta with CRDT backend\n- Gradual migration from v1.x\n- Monitoring and bug fixes\n- Final v2.0 release\n\n## Risks \u0026 Mitigations\n\n**Risk 1: Performance overhead**\n- Mitigation: Benchmark early, optimize hot paths\n- CRDTs can be slower than append-only logs\n- May need compaction strategy\n\n**Risk 2: Storage bloat**\n- Mitigation: Implement operation log compaction\n- Tombstone garbage collection for deleted issues\n- Periodic snapshots to reduce log size\n\n**Risk 3: Breaking changes**\n- Mitigation: Maintain v1.x compatibility layer\n- Gradual migration tools\n- Dual-mode operation during transition\n\n**Risk 4: Complexity**\n- Mitigation: Use battle-tested CRDT libraries\n- Comprehensive documentation\n- Clear migration guide\n\n## Success Criteria\n- 100-clone collision test passes without failures\n- Formal proof of convergence properties\n- Performance within 2x of current system\n- Zero manual conflict resolution required\n- Backward compatible with v1.x databases\n\n## Timeline\n18-20 weeks total (4-5 months)\n\n## References\n- Automerge: https://automerge.org\n- Yjs: https://docs.yjs.dev\n- Loro: https://loro.dev\n- CRDT theory: Shapiro et al, A comprehensive study of CRDTs\n- Related issues: bd-e6d71828, bd-7a2b58fc,-1","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-10-29T10:23:57.978339-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.182513-07:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-72w","content_hash":"55110afd5c4cd8e94796fe61fada9e32351e76f7fca57ce15e52fe6443e6e117","title":"Q4 Platform Improvements","description":"## Overview\n\n[Describe the high-level goal and scope of this epic]\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- [ ] Criteria 1\n- [ ] Criteria 2\n- [ ] Criteria 3\n\n## Background\n\n[Provide context and motivation]\n\n## Scope\n\n**In Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n\n**Out of Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n","design":"## Architecture\n\n[Describe the overall architecture and approach]\n\n## Components\n\n- Component 1: [description]\n- Component 2: [description]\n\n## Dependencies\n\n[List external dependencies or constraints]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] All child issues are completed\n- [ ] Integration tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation is updated\n- [ ] Code review completed\n","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:54:03.794244-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T00:25:06.51152-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T00:25:06.51152-08:00","source_repo":".","labels":["epic"]}
{"id":"bd-7315","content_hash":"81137222aba60b33d3bcd7637891cf94547b5c876a1608e3e3370a578ba165f3","title":"Add validation for duplicate external_ref in batch imports","description":"Currently, if a batch import contains multiple issues with the same external_ref, the behavior is undefined. We should detect and handle this case.\n\nCurrent behavior:\n- No validation for duplicate external_ref within a batch\n- Last-write-wins or non-deterministic behavior\n\nProposed solution:\n- Detect duplicate external_ref values in incoming batch\n- Fail with clear error message OR\n- Merge duplicates intelligently (use newest timestamp)\n- Add test case for this scenario\n\nRelated: bd-1022","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T15:31:55.85634-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T16:03:50.374552-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-02T16:03:50.374552-08:00","source_repo":"."}
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@
{"id":"bd-8f8b","content_hash":"ed8fd55f5795bd49d6640e567bbf3e8d8f00ccc35ad785f0b6c23dbb3aafc19c","title":"Test update","description":"","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T12:59:13.608216-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T12:59:20.120052-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T12:59:20.120052-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-8hf","content_hash":"ec57c5cb45f0afdbccf3c0b9e383f5ff8023f853393f8afda09189edc63ddd95","title":"Auto-routing and maintainer detection","description":"Implement intelligent routing to automatically send new issues to correct repo based on user's maintainer vs contributor status, with discovered issues inheriting parent's source_repo.","design":"Features:\n- Detect maintainer vs contributor (git config, permissions)\n- Config-based routing rules (no schema changes)\n- Auto-route 'bd add' to primary or planning repo\n- Discovered issues inherit parent's source_repo\n- Explicit override via --repo flag\n\nConfig schema:\n[routing]\nmode = \"auto\" # auto | explicit\ndefault = \"~/.beads-planning\"\n[routing.auto]\nmaintainer = \".\"\ncontributor = \"~/.beads-planning\"","acceptance_criteria":"1. Auto-detect maintainer vs contributor status\n2. Route bd add to correct repo automatically\n3. Discovered issues inherit parent's source_repo\n4. --repo flag overrides auto-routing\n5. Config allows explicit routing rules\n6. Works without breaking single-repo workflows","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-04T11:21:50.961196-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T00:08:38.197718-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T00:08:38.19772-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-8hf","depends_on_id":"bd-4ms","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-04T11:22:24.262815-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-8rd","content_hash":"35b240c77c0960acd2810a0ace985b85cdde4d16a2c4af7192a9526434143fa9","title":"Migration and onboarding for multi-repo","description":"Create migration tools, wizards, and documentation to help users adopt multi-repo workflow, with special focus on OSS contributor onboarding and team adoption scenarios.","design":"Components:\n- Migration guide documentation\n- bd migrate command to move issues between repos\n- bd init --contributor wizard for OSS setup\n- bd init --team wizard for team setup\n- Auto-detect scenarios and prompt users\n- Examples for common workflows (OSS, multi-phase, personas)\n\nScenarios:\n1. OSS contributor (fork workflow)\n2. Team member (branch workflow)\n3. Multi-phase development\n4. Multiple personas (architect/implementer)","acceptance_criteria":"1. Migration guide covers all scenarios\n2. bd migrate moves issues with filtering\n3. Init wizards guide common setups\n4. Examples demonstrate key workflows\n5. Auto-detection prompts users when appropriate\n6. Docs updated with multi-repo patterns\n7. Backward compatibility clearly documented","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-04T11:22:13.491033-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T11:22:13.491033-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-8rd","depends_on_id":"bd-4ms","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-04T11:22:21.858002-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-8zpg","content_hash":"55cf85b25c08df266cc3239ce3c58bc8568761dd5b9b02cbe2009b6a30ae23e8","title":"Add tests for bd init --contributor wizard","description":"Write integration tests for the contributor wizard:\n- Test fork detection logic\n- Test planning repo creation\n- Test config setup\n- Test with/without upstream remote\n- Test with SSH vs HTTPS origins","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:58:18.171851-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T18:58:18.171851-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-9063acda","content_hash":"0ea4606188e376705c46a14e5d64da1b706aad47a39054a732c21330db601960","title":"Clean up linter errors (914 total issues)","description":"The codebase has 914 linter issues reported by golangci-lint. While many are documented as baseline in LINTING.md, we should clean these up systematically to improve code quality and maintainability.","design":"Break down by linter category, prioritizing high-impact issues:\n1. dupl (7) - Code duplication\n2. goconst (12) - Repeated strings\n3. gocyclo (11) - High complexity functions\n4. revive (78) - Style issues\n5. gosec (102) - Security warnings\n6. errcheck (683) - Unchecked errors (many in tests)","acceptance_criteria":"All linter categories reduced to acceptable levels, with remaining baseline documented in LINTING.md","notes":"Reduced from 56 to 41 issues locally, then to 0 issues.\n\n**Fixed in commits:**\n- c2c7eda: Fixed 15 actual errors (dupl, gosec, revive, staticcheck, unparam)\n- 963181d: Configured exclusions to get to 0 issues locally\n\n**Current status:**\n- ✅ Local: golangci-lint reports 0 issues\n- ❌ CI: Still failing (see [deleted:bd-cb64c226.1])\n\n**Problem:**\nConfig v2 format or golangci-lint-action@v8 compatibility issue causing CI to fail despite local success.\n\n**Next:** Debug [deleted:bd-cb64c226.1] to fix CI/local discrepancy","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-10-24T01:01:12.997982-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T11:10:23.532431-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-04T11:10:23.532433-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-90a5","content_hash":"e54904609d3be88a50850d032fbbc1729a48d79436ff0ab5204d1cc044b93c47","title":"Extract hash ID generation functions to hash_ids.go","description":"Move generateHashID, getNextChildNumber, GetNextChildID to hash_ids.go","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-01T19:28:54.890883-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T12:32:00.159056-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-02T12:32:00.159058-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-942469b8","content_hash":"be178337752bf9a94ac06f13d6c36752c9104585b9aef43ade971ed50437a39e","title":"Rapid 5","description":"","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T19:11:57.508166-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.189947-07:00","source_repo":"."}
@@ -218,8 +219,9 @@
{"id":"bd-hw3c","content_hash":"83359ec96e2b8fc9ce2ece25d56bfbc1c1f948b27dfa56cc7b3715dc86c6d024","title":"Fix GH #227: bd edit broken pipe errors","description":"bd edit command gets \"broken pipe\" errors when using daemon mode because editing can take minutes and the daemon connection times out.\n\nSolution: Force bd edit to always use direct mode (--no-daemon) since it's human-only and interactive.\n\nFixed by checking cmd.Name() == \"edit\" in main.go PersistentPreRun and setting noDaemon = true.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-05T14:36:04.289431-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T14:36:08.103964-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T14:36:08.103964-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-k0j9","content_hash":"52d1e6f87bd7655018bd89dbbbaf8da66bdcba45de6138fd237810365a04606a","title":"Test dependency parent","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T11:23:02.505901-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T11:23:20.91305-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T11:23:20.91305-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-k58","content_hash":"cc90fb20e7bd178b52133d4d0f8781dce2debb46519674ae6356291d597fc13d","title":"Proposal workflow (propose/withdraw/accept)","description":"Implement commands and state machine for moving issues between personal planning repos and canonical upstream repos, enabling contributors to propose work without polluting PRs.","design":"Commands:\n- bd propose \u003cid\u003e [--target \u003crepo\u003e] - Move issue to target repo\n- bd withdraw \u003cid\u003e - Un-propose (move back)\n- bd accept \u003cid\u003e - Maintainer accepts proposal\n\nVisibility states:\n- local: Personal planning only\n- proposed: Staged for upstream PR\n- canonical: Accepted by upstream (default for existing)\n\nOptional visibility field (backward compatible, defaults to canonical)","acceptance_criteria":"1. bd propose moves issue from planning to primary repo\n2. bd withdraw reverses proposal\n3. bd accept (maintainer) finalizes acceptance\n4. Visibility field tracks state (local/proposed/canonical)\n5. Backward compatible - existing issues default to canonical\n6. State transitions are atomic and git-tracked","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-04T11:21:41.113647-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T00:08:38.19821-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T00:08:38.198213-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-k58","depends_on_id":"bd-4ms","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-04T11:22:21.811261-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-kla1","content_hash":"2762b55f8144b7e876d010c1f98cd4b08846388953ca5f9cd8fde01e2d67c3e2","title":"Add bd init --contributor wizard","description":"Interactive wizard for OSS contributor setup. Guides user through: fork workflow setup, separate planning repo configuration, auto-detection of fork relationships, examples of common OSS workflows.","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:29.958409-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:29.958409-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-kla1","depends_on_id":"bd-8rd","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:39.120064-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-kla1","content_hash":"22de733961d0d91a06a9be8229663772c3615ba9b3e0b9b079fe332a566325b0","title":"Add bd init --contributor wizard","description":"Interactive wizard for OSS contributor setup. Guides user through: fork workflow setup, separate planning repo configuration, auto-detection of fork relationships, examples of common OSS workflows.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:29.958409-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T18:53:51.267625-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T18:53:51.267625-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-kla1","depends_on_id":"bd-8rd","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:39.120064-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-ktng","content_hash":"0a09f3e1549a70817f23aa57444811aaf18683ff9336944ff6e8c277ac5684b4","title":"Optimize CLI test suite - eliminate redundant git init calls","description":"Current: Each of 13 CLI tests calls git init (31s total). Solution: Use single test binary built once in init(), skip git operations where possible, or use mock filesystem.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T11:23:13.660276-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T11:23:13.660276-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-ktng","depends_on_id":"bd-l5gq","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-11-04T11:23:13.662102-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-l4b6","content_hash":"c02df9c4d3da5f49d105001dd051386458b8f29cf543b3704a32ccaf407c81e3","title":"Add tests for bd init --team wizard","description":"Write integration tests for the team wizard:\n- Test branch detection\n- Test sync branch creation\n- Test protected branch workflow\n- Test auto-sync configuration","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:58:18.192425-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T18:58:18.192425-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-l5gq","content_hash":"9c6f895c8e0066874073474fded02d3b1b10a008c3448f1e650e2ff39b5e8e02","title":"Optimize test suite performance - cut runtime by 50%+","description":"## Problem\nTest suite takes ~20.8 seconds, with 95% of time spent in just 2 tests:\n- TestHashIDs_MultiCloneConverge: 11.08s (53%)\n- TestHashIDs_IdenticalContentDedup: 8.78s (42%)\n\nBoth tests in beads_hash_multiclone_test.go perform extensive Git operations (bare repos, multiple clones, sync rounds).\n\n## Goal\nCut total test time by at least 50% (to ~10 seconds or less).\n\n## Analysis\nTests already have some optimizations:\n- --shared --depth=1 --no-tags for fast cloning\n- Disabled hooks, gc, fsync\n- Support -short flag\n\n## Impact\n- Faster development feedback loop\n- Reduced CI costs and time\n- Better developer experience","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:23:14.410648-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T12:27:51.43013-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-04T12:27:51.430134-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-lwnt","content_hash":"ddfa247870eb3734ffa7a4d0da6fcd4a359d2b48e02d70aad8560ec4bc13afdc","title":"Test P1 priority","description":"","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T12:58:38.074112-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T12:58:44.711763-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T12:58:44.711763-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-mlcz","content_hash":"35434fed7e20e8b67f7b598c46ce5dc65c111de237ea38b36a88a671b023b58b","title":"Implement bd migrate command","description":"Add bd migrate command to move issues between repos with filtering. Should support: filtering by status/priority/labels, dry-run mode, preserving dependencies, handling source_repo field updates.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:29.902151-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T18:42:52.536951-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T18:42:52.536951-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-mlcz","depends_on_id":"bd-8rd","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:39.072312-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
@@ -227,7 +229,7 @@
{"id":"bd-p68x","content_hash":"65d91db2b3dea8e73af4b5830daf7b815c2b53dfdf7f7dbdd3e2ac24ea41c1ce","title":"Create examples for common workflows","description":"Add examples/ subdirectories: OSS contributor workflow, team branch workflow, multi-phase development, multiple personas (architect/implementer). Each with README and sample configs.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:30.128257-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:30.128257-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-p68x","depends_on_id":"bd-8rd","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:39.247515-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-pdwz","content_hash":"5c35a877ec5fa3af14a45a920764e7a4c289f93c427a479da7b335c068195af0","title":"Add t.Parallel() to slow hash multiclone tests","description":"Add t.Parallel() to TestHashIDs_MultiCloneConverge and TestHashIDs_IdenticalContentDedup so they run concurrently.\n\nExpected savings: ~10 seconds (from 20s to ~11s)\n\nImplementation:\n- Add t.Parallel() call at start of each test function\n- Verify tests don't share resources that would cause conflicts\n- Run tests to confirm they work in parallel\n\nFile: beads_hash_multiclone_test.go:34, :101","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:15.705228-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T09:52:31.945545-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-04T09:52:31.945545-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-pdwz","depends_on_id":"bd-l5gq","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:15.706149-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-ry1u","content_hash":"013464efc3cf53d47c2a170040c66099ce77b13d3d1b34c3729e6a5208122799","title":"Publish official devcontainer configuration","description":"","design":"Problem: GH issue #229 shows git hooks aren't available in devcontainers because bd CLI isn't installed. Solution: Provide official .devcontainer/devcontainer.json that installs Go, builds bd from source, runs bd init --quiet, and installs hooks automatically. Benefits: New contributors start immediately, AI assistants work out-of-box, no manual setup. Implementation: Create .devcontainer/devcontainer.json with Go feature, postCreateCommand to build bd and install hooks, environment variables. Acceptance: Container builds with bd installed, hooks functional, documentation updated, tested with Codespaces and VSCode.","notes":"Devcontainer configuration implemented. Manual testing required in actual devcontainer environment (Codespaces or VSCode Remote Containers). All code changes complete, tests pass, linting clean.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-05T15:02:21.783666-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T17:52:53.019917-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T17:46:42.70998-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-twlr","content_hash":"fc60f35f4f809cda125a1afe9f0328cb91a726f1ab59f81592c5807d00233f21","title":"Add bd init --team wizard","description":"Interactive wizard for team workflow setup. Guides user through: branch workflow configuration, shared repo setup, team member onboarding, examples of team collaboration patterns.","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:30.013645-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:30.013645-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-twlr","depends_on_id":"bd-8rd","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:39.164445-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-twlr","content_hash":"85bb87aa0a7988bf3399b1ebfe3115302aa9e487097415cb8573cd8aad7392c2","title":"Add bd init --team wizard","description":"Interactive wizard for team workflow setup. Guides user through: branch workflow configuration, shared repo setup, team member onboarding, examples of team collaboration patterns.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:30.013645-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T18:56:03.004161-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T18:56:03.004161-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-twlr","depends_on_id":"bd-8rd","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-05T18:04:39.164445-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"bd-u8j","content_hash":"91f39bbd4f2394592407c77917682b2c7c3a0b6415a3572eb75a49b0486a17fe","title":"Clarify exclusive lock protocol compatibility with multi-repo","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md proposes per-repo file locking (Decision #7) using flock on JSONL files. However, VC (a downstream library consumer) uses an exclusive lock protocol (vc-195, requires Beads v0.17.3+) that allows bd daemon and VC executor to coexist.\n\nNeed to clarify:\n- Does the proposed per-repo file locking work with VC's existing exclusive lock protocol?\n- Do library consumers like VC need to adapt their locking logic?\n- Can multiple repos be locked atomically for cross-repo operations?\n\nContext: contributor-workflow-analysis.md lines 662-681","acceptance_criteria":"- Documentation explicitly states compatibility or incompatibility with existing lock protocols\n- If incompatible, migration path is documented for library consumers\n- If compatible, example showing coexistence is provided","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:08.257493-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T14:19:11.205328-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T14:15:01.506885-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-wta","content_hash":"eee40bbe4e00af632ad46e1461a25e4b0e5508bea115422aea0772381eec0d84","title":"Add performance benchmarks for multi-repo hydration","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md asserts sub-second queries (line 702) and describes smart caching via file mtime tracking (Decision #4, lines 584-618), but doesn't provide concrete performance benchmarks.\n\nVC's requirement (from VC feedback section):\n- Executor polls GetReadyWork() every 5-10 seconds\n- Queries must be sub-second (ideally \u003c100ms)\n- Smart caching must avoid re-parsing JSONLs on every query\n\nSuggested performance targets to validate:\n- File stat overhead: \u003c1ms per repo\n- Hydration (when needed): \u003c500ms for typical JSONL (\u003c25k)\n- Query (from cache): \u003c10ms\n- Total GetReadyWork(): \u003c100ms (VC's requirement)\n\nAlso test at scale:\n- N=1 repo (baseline)\n- N=3 repos (typical)\n- N=10 repos (edge case)\n\nThese benchmarks are critical for library consumers like VC that run automated polling loops.","acceptance_criteria":"- Performance benchmark suite created for multi-repo hydration\n- Benchmarks cover file stat, hydration, and query times\n- Tests at N=1, N=3, N=10 repo scales\n- Results documented in contributor-workflow-analysis.md\n- Performance targets met or issues filed for optimization","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:39.331528-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T14:19:11.205631-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T14:17:15.079226-08:00","source_repo":"."}
{"id":"bd-x47","content_hash":"e363d887fa6693c1c748d78ea9cdaaa97606889d910f318fbd29584576da57e9","title":"Add guidance for self-hosting projects","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md is optimized for OSS contributors making PRs to upstream projects. However, it doesn't address projects like VC that use beads for their own development (self-hosting).\n\nSelf-hosting projects differ from OSS contributors:\n- No upstream/downstream distinction (they ARE the project)\n- May run automated executors (not just humans)\n- In bootstrap/early phase (stability matters)\n- Single team/owner (not multiple contributors with permissions)\n\nGuidance needed on:\n- When self-hosting projects should stay single-repo (default, recommended)\n- When they should adopt multi-repo (team planning, multi-phase dev)\n- How automated executors should handle multi-repo (if at all)\n- Special considerations for projects in bootstrap phase\n\nExamples of self-hosting projects: VC (building itself with beads), internal tools, pet projects","acceptance_criteria":"- Section added: 'For Projects Using Beads for Self-Hosting'\n- Clear guidance on when to stay single-repo vs adopt multi-repo\n- Recommendations for automated executor behavior with multi-repo\n- Bootstrap phase considerations documented","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:27.805341-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T14:19:11.205917-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T14:16:34.69662-08:00","source_repo":"."}