diff --git a/.beads/beads.jsonl b/.beads/beads.jsonl index d5887724..2dd631cb 100644 --- a/.beads/beads.jsonl +++ b/.beads/beads.jsonl @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ {"id":"bd-5f483051","content_hash":"d69f64f7f0bdc46a539dfe0b699a8977309c9c8d59f3e9beffbbe4484275a16b","title":"Implement bd resolve-conflicts (git merge conflicts in JSONL)","description":"Automatically detect and resolve git merge conflicts in .beads/issues.jsonl file.\n\nFeatures:\n- Detect conflict markers in JSONL\n- Parse conflicting issues from HEAD and BASE\n- Provide mechanical resolution (remap duplicate IDs)\n- Support AI-assisted resolution (requires internal/ai package)\n\nSee repair_commands.md lines 125-353 for design.","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T19:37:55.722827-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.179718-07:00"} {"id":"bd-6214875c","content_hash":"d4d20e71bbf5c08f1fe1ed07f67b7554167aa165d4972ea51b5cacc1b256c4c1","title":"Split internal/rpc/server.go into focused modules","description":"The file `internal/rpc/server.go` is 2,273 lines with 50+ methods, making it difficult to navigate and prone to merge conflicts. Split into 8 focused files with clear responsibilities.\n\nCurrent structure: Single 2,273-line file with:\n- Connection handling\n- Request routing\n- All 40+ RPC method implementations\n- Storage caching\n- Health checks \u0026 metrics\n- Cleanup loops\n\nTarget structure:\n```\ninternal/rpc/\n├── server.go # Core server, connection handling (~300 lines)\n├── methods_issue.go # Issue operations (~400 lines)\n├── methods_deps.go # Dependency operations (~200 lines)\n├── methods_labels.go # Label operations (~150 lines)\n├── methods_ready.go # Ready work queries (~150 lines)\n├── methods_compact.go # Compaction operations (~200 lines)\n├── methods_comments.go # Comment operations (~150 lines)\n├── storage_cache.go # Storage caching logic (~300 lines)\n└── health.go # Health \u0026 metrics (~200 lines)\n```\n\nMigration strategy:\n1. Create new files with appropriate methods\n2. Keep `server.go` as main file with core server logic\n3. Test incrementally after each file split\n4. Final verification with full test suite","acceptance_criteria":"- All 50 methods split into appropriate files\n- Each file \u003c500 LOC\n- All methods remain on `*Server` receiver (no behavior change)\n- All tests pass: `go test ./internal/rpc/...`\n- Verify daemon works: start daemon, run operations, check health\n- Update internal documentation if needed\n- No change to public API","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T14:21:37.51524-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.2179-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-28T14:11:04.399811-07:00"} {"id":"bd-6221bdcd","content_hash":"3bf15bc9e418180e1e91691261817c872330e182dbc1bcb756522faa42416667","title":"Improve cmd/bd test coverage (currently 20.2%)","description":"CLI commands need better test coverage. Focus on:\n- Command argument parsing\n- Error handling paths\n- Edge cases in create, update, close commands\n- Daemon commands\n- Import/export workflows","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-29T14:06:27.951656-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.185819-07:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-6221bdcd","depends_on_id":"bd-4d7fca8a","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-10-29T19:52:05.532391-07:00","created_by":"import-remap"}]} -{"id":"bd-627d","content_hash":"f8a51fc4fee497668273813c8ec9e16149910761f0a97d724c5f11c7725a19c8","title":"AI-supervised database migrations for safer schema evolution","description":"## Problem\n\nDatabase migrations can lose user data through edge cases that are hard to anticipate (e.g., GH #201 where bd migrate failed to set issue_prefix, or bd-d355a07d false positive data loss warnings). Since beads is designed to be run by AI agents, we should leverage AI to make migrations safer.\n\n## Current State\n\nMigrations run blindly with:\n- No pre-flight validation\n- No data integrity verification\n- No rollback on failure\n- Limited post-migration testing\n\nRecent issues:\n- GH #201: Migration didn't set issue_prefix config, breaking commands\n- bd-d355a07d: False positive \"data loss\" warnings on collision resolution\n- Users reported migration data loss (fixed but broader problem remains)\n\n## Proposal: AI-Supervised Migration Framework\n\nUse AI to supervise migrations through structured verification:\n\n### 1. Pre-Migration Analysis\n- AI reads migration code and current schema\n- Identifies potential data loss scenarios\n- Generates validation queries to verify assumptions\n- Creates snapshot queries for before/after comparison\n\n### 2. Migration Execution\n- Take database backup/snapshot\n- Run validation queries (pre-state)\n- Execute migration in transaction\n- Run validation queries (post-state)\n\n### 3. Post-Migration Verification\n- AI compares pre/post snapshots\n- Verifies data integrity invariants\n- Checks for unexpected data loss\n- Validates config completeness (like issue_prefix)\n\n### 4. Rollback on Anomalies\n- If AI detects data loss, rollback transaction\n- Present human-readable error report\n- Suggest fix before retrying\n\n## Example Flow\n\n```\n$ bd migrate\n\n→ Analyzing migration plan...\n→ AI identified 3 potential data loss scenarios\n→ Generating validation queries...\n→ Creating pre-migration snapshot...\n→ Running migration in transaction...\n→ Verifying post-migration state...\n✓ All 247 issues accounted for\n✓ Config table complete (issue_prefix: \"mcp\")\n✓ Dependencies intact (342 relationships verified)\n→ Migration successful!\n```\n\nIf something goes wrong:\n```\n$ bd migrate\n\n→ Analyzing migration plan...\n→ AI identified issue: Missing issue_prefix config after migration\n→ Recommendation: Add prefix detection step\n→ Aborting migration - database unchanged\n```\n\n## Implementation Ideas\n\n### A. Migration Validator Tool\nCreate `bd migrate --validate` that:\n- Simulates migration on copy of database\n- Uses AI to verify data integrity\n- Reports potential issues before real migration\n\n### B. Migration Test Generator\nAI generates test cases for migrations:\n- Edge cases (empty DB, large DB, missing config)\n- Data integrity checks\n- Regression tests\n\n### C. Migration Invariants\nDefine invariants that AI checks:\n- Issue count should not decrease (unless collision resolution)\n- All required config keys present\n- Foreign key relationships intact\n- No orphaned dependencies\n\n### D. Self-Healing Migrations\nAI detects incomplete migrations and suggests fixes:\n- Missing config values (like GH #201)\n- Orphaned data\n- Index inconsistencies\n\n## Benefits\n\n1. **Catch edge cases**: AI explores scenarios humans miss\n2. **Self-documenting**: AI explains what migration does\n3. **Agent-friendly**: Agents can run migrations confidently\n4. **Fewer rollbacks**: Detect issues before committing\n5. **Better testing**: AI generates comprehensive test suites\n\n## Open Questions\n\n1. Which AI model? (Fast: Haiku, Thorough: Sonnet/GPT-4)\n2. How to balance safety vs migration speed?\n3. Should AI validation be required or optional?\n4. How to handle offline scenarios (no API access)?\n5. What invariants should always be checked?\n\n## Related Work\n\n- bd-b245: Migration registry (makes migrations introspectable)\n- GH #201: issue_prefix migration bug (motivating example)\n- bd-d355a07d: False positive data loss warnings","design":"## Architecture: Agent-Supervised Migrations (Inversion of Control)\n\n**Key principle:** Beads provides observability and validation primitives. AI agents supervise using their own reasoning. Beads NEVER makes AI API calls.\n\n## Phase 1: Migration Invariants (Pure Validation)\n\nCreate `internal/storage/sqlite/migration_invariants.go`:\n\n```go\ntype MigrationInvariant struct {\n Name string\n Description string\n Check func(*sql.DB, *Snapshot) error\n}\n\ntype Snapshot struct {\n IssueCount int\n ConfigKeys []string\n DependencyCount int\n LabelCount int\n}\n\nvar invariants = []MigrationInvariant{\n {\n Name: \"required_config_present\",\n Description: \"Required config keys must exist\",\n Check: checkRequiredConfig, // Would have caught GH #201\n },\n {\n Name: \"foreign_keys_valid\",\n Description: \"No orphaned dependencies or labels\",\n Check: checkForeignKeys,\n },\n {\n Name: \"issue_count_stable\",\n Description: \"Issue count should not decrease unexpectedly\",\n Check: checkIssueCount,\n },\n}\n\nfunc checkRequiredConfig(db *sql.DB, snapshot *Snapshot) error {\n required := []string{\"issue_prefix\", \"schema_version\"}\n for _, key := range required {\n var value string\n err := db.QueryRow(\"SELECT value FROM config WHERE key = ?\", key).Scan(\u0026value)\n if err != nil || value == \"\" {\n return fmt.Errorf(\"required config key missing: %s\", key)\n }\n }\n return nil\n}\n```\n\n## Phase 2: Dry-Run \u0026 Inspection Tools\n\nAdd `bd migrate --dry-run --json`:\n\n```json\n{\n \"pending_migrations\": [\n {\"name\": \"dirty_issues_table\", \"description\": \"Adds dirty_issues table\"},\n {\"name\": \"content_hash_column\", \"description\": \"Adds content_hash for collision resolution\"}\n ],\n \"current_state\": {\n \"schema_version\": \"0.9.9\",\n \"issue_count\": 247,\n \"config\": {\"schema_version\": \"0.9.9\"},\n \"missing_config\": [\"issue_prefix\"]\n },\n \"warnings\": [\n \"issue_prefix config not set - may break commands after migration\"\n ],\n \"invariants_to_check\": [\n \"required_config_present\",\n \"foreign_keys_valid\",\n \"issue_count_stable\"\n ]\n}\n```\n\nAdd `bd info --schema --json`:\n\n```json\n{\n \"tables\": [\"issues\", \"dependencies\", \"labels\", \"config\"],\n \"schema_version\": \"0.9.9\",\n \"config\": {},\n \"sample_issue_ids\": [\"mcp-1\", \"mcp-2\"],\n \"detected_prefix\": \"mcp\"\n}\n```\n\n## Phase 3: Pre/Post Snapshots with Rollback\n\nUpdate `RunMigrations()`:\n\n```go\nfunc RunMigrations(db *sql.DB) error {\n // Capture pre-migration snapshot\n snapshot := captureSnapshot(db)\n \n // Run migrations in transaction\n tx, err := db.Begin()\n if err != nil {\n return err\n }\n defer tx.Rollback()\n \n for _, migration := range migrations {\n if err := migration.Func(tx); err != nil {\n return fmt.Errorf(\"migration %s failed: %w\", migration.Name, err)\n }\n }\n \n // Verify invariants before commit\n if err := verifyInvariants(tx, snapshot); err != nil {\n return fmt.Errorf(\"post-migration validation failed (rolled back): %w\", err)\n }\n \n return tx.Commit()\n}\n```\n\n## Phase 4: MCP Tools for Agent Supervision\n\nAdd to beads-mcp:\n\n```python\n@server.tool()\nasync def inspect_migration(workspace_root: str) -\u003e dict:\n \"\"\"Get migration plan and current state for agent analysis.\n \n Agent should:\n 1. Review pending migrations\n 2. Check for warnings (missing config, etc.)\n 3. Verify invariants will pass\n 4. Decide whether to run bd migrate\n \"\"\"\n result = run_bd([\"migrate\", \"--dry-run\", \"--json\"], workspace_root)\n return json.loads(result.stdout)\n\n@server.tool() \nasync def get_schema_info(workspace_root: str) -\u003e dict:\n \"\"\"Get current database schema for migration analysis.\"\"\"\n result = run_bd([\"info\", \"--schema\", \"--json\"], workspace_root)\n return json.loads(result.stdout)\n```\n\n## Agent Workflow Example\n\n```python\n# Agent detects user wants to migrate\nmigration_plan = inspect_migration(\"/path/to/workspace\")\n\n# Agent analyzes (using its own reasoning, no API calls from beads)\nif \"issue_prefix\" in migration_plan[\"missing_config\"]:\n schema = get_schema_info(\"/path/to/workspace\")\n detected_prefix = schema[\"detected_prefix\"]\n \n # Agent fixes issue before migration\n run_bd([\"config\", \"set\", \"issue_prefix\", detected_prefix])\n \n# Now safe to migrate\nrun_bd([\"migrate\"])\n```\n\n## What Beads Provides\n\n✅ Deterministic validation (invariants)\n✅ Structured inspection (--dry-run, --explain)\n✅ Rollback on invariant failure\n✅ JSON output for agent parsing\n\n## What Beads Does NOT Do\n\n❌ No AI API calls\n❌ No external model access\n❌ No agent invocation\n\nAgents supervise migrations using their own reasoning and the inspection tools beads provides.","acceptance_criteria":"Phase 1: Migration invariants implemented and tested, checked after every migration, clear error messages when invariants fail.\n\nPhase 2: Snapshot capture before migrations, comparison after, rollback on verification failure.\n\nPhase 3 (stretch): AI validation optional flag implemented, AI can analyze migration code and generate custom validation queries.\n\nPhase 4 (stretch): Migration test fixtures created, all fixtures pass migrations, CI runs migration tests.","notes":"Acceptance Criteria:\n\nPhase 1 (Foundation):\n- Migration invariants implemented (required_config, foreign_keys, issue_count)\n- Invariants checked after RunMigrations\n- Clear error messages on invariant failures\n- Unit tests for each invariant\n\nPhase 2 (Observability):\n- bd migrate --dry-run --json shows migration plan\n- bd info --schema --json returns schema details\n- Warnings for missing config (like issue_prefix)\n- Sample issue IDs and detected prefix included\n\nPhase 3 (Safety): \n- RunMigrations wraps in transaction\n- Pre-migration snapshot captured\n- Invariants verified before commit\n- Rollback on any invariant failure\n- Integration test: migration failure rolls back cleanly\n\nPhase 4 (Agent Tools):\n- MCP inspect_migration tool added\n- MCP get_schema_info tool added\n- Agent workflow documented\n- Example agent supervision code in docs","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-02T12:57:10.722048-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T13:11:24.905128-08:00"} +{"id":"bd-627d","content_hash":"7699e2592edfb2994ae5e913d8b762995a9b784d21edec02bfa175f13e82d71d","title":"AI-supervised database migrations for safer schema evolution","description":"## Problem\n\nDatabase migrations can lose user data through edge cases that are hard to anticipate (e.g., GH #201 where bd migrate failed to set issue_prefix, or bd-d355a07d false positive data loss warnings). Since beads is designed to be run by AI agents, we should leverage AI to make migrations safer.\n\n## Current State\n\nMigrations run blindly with:\n- No pre-flight validation\n- No data integrity verification\n- No rollback on failure\n- Limited post-migration testing\n\nRecent issues:\n- GH #201: Migration didn't set issue_prefix config, breaking commands\n- bd-d355a07d: False positive \"data loss\" warnings on collision resolution\n- Users reported migration data loss (fixed but broader problem remains)\n\n## Proposal: AI-Supervised Migration Framework\n\nUse AI to supervise migrations through structured verification:\n\n### 1. Pre-Migration Analysis\n- AI reads migration code and current schema\n- Identifies potential data loss scenarios\n- Generates validation queries to verify assumptions\n- Creates snapshot queries for before/after comparison\n\n### 2. Migration Execution\n- Take database backup/snapshot\n- Run validation queries (pre-state)\n- Execute migration in transaction\n- Run validation queries (post-state)\n\n### 3. Post-Migration Verification\n- AI compares pre/post snapshots\n- Verifies data integrity invariants\n- Checks for unexpected data loss\n- Validates config completeness (like issue_prefix)\n\n### 4. Rollback on Anomalies\n- If AI detects data loss, rollback transaction\n- Present human-readable error report\n- Suggest fix before retrying\n\n## Example Flow\n\n```\n$ bd migrate\n\n→ Analyzing migration plan...\n→ AI identified 3 potential data loss scenarios\n→ Generating validation queries...\n→ Creating pre-migration snapshot...\n→ Running migration in transaction...\n→ Verifying post-migration state...\n✓ All 247 issues accounted for\n✓ Config table complete (issue_prefix: \"mcp\")\n✓ Dependencies intact (342 relationships verified)\n→ Migration successful!\n```\n\nIf something goes wrong:\n```\n$ bd migrate\n\n→ Analyzing migration plan...\n→ AI identified issue: Missing issue_prefix config after migration\n→ Recommendation: Add prefix detection step\n→ Aborting migration - database unchanged\n```\n\n## Implementation Ideas\n\n### A. Migration Validator Tool\nCreate `bd migrate --validate` that:\n- Simulates migration on copy of database\n- Uses AI to verify data integrity\n- Reports potential issues before real migration\n\n### B. Migration Test Generator\nAI generates test cases for migrations:\n- Edge cases (empty DB, large DB, missing config)\n- Data integrity checks\n- Regression tests\n\n### C. Migration Invariants\nDefine invariants that AI checks:\n- Issue count should not decrease (unless collision resolution)\n- All required config keys present\n- Foreign key relationships intact\n- No orphaned dependencies\n\n### D. Self-Healing Migrations\nAI detects incomplete migrations and suggests fixes:\n- Missing config values (like GH #201)\n- Orphaned data\n- Index inconsistencies\n\n## Benefits\n\n1. **Catch edge cases**: AI explores scenarios humans miss\n2. **Self-documenting**: AI explains what migration does\n3. **Agent-friendly**: Agents can run migrations confidently\n4. **Fewer rollbacks**: Detect issues before committing\n5. **Better testing**: AI generates comprehensive test suites\n\n## Open Questions\n\n1. Which AI model? (Fast: Haiku, Thorough: Sonnet/GPT-4)\n2. How to balance safety vs migration speed?\n3. Should AI validation be required or optional?\n4. How to handle offline scenarios (no API access)?\n5. What invariants should always be checked?\n\n## Related Work\n\n- bd-b245: Migration registry (makes migrations introspectable)\n- GH #201: issue_prefix migration bug (motivating example)\n- bd-d355a07d: False positive data loss warnings","design":"## Architecture: Agent-Supervised Migrations (Inversion of Control)\n\n**Key principle:** Beads provides observability and validation primitives. AI agents supervise using their own reasoning. Beads NEVER makes AI API calls.\n\n## Phase 1: Migration Invariants (Pure Validation)\n\nCreate `internal/storage/sqlite/migration_invariants.go`:\n\n```go\ntype MigrationInvariant struct {\n Name string\n Description string\n Check func(*sql.DB, *Snapshot) error\n}\n\ntype Snapshot struct {\n IssueCount int\n ConfigKeys []string\n DependencyCount int\n LabelCount int\n}\n\nvar invariants = []MigrationInvariant{\n {\n Name: \"required_config_present\",\n Description: \"Required config keys must exist\",\n Check: checkRequiredConfig, // Would have caught GH #201\n },\n {\n Name: \"foreign_keys_valid\",\n Description: \"No orphaned dependencies or labels\",\n Check: checkForeignKeys,\n },\n {\n Name: \"issue_count_stable\",\n Description: \"Issue count should not decrease unexpectedly\",\n Check: checkIssueCount,\n },\n}\n\nfunc checkRequiredConfig(db *sql.DB, snapshot *Snapshot) error {\n required := []string{\"issue_prefix\", \"schema_version\"}\n for _, key := range required {\n var value string\n err := db.QueryRow(\"SELECT value FROM config WHERE key = ?\", key).Scan(\u0026value)\n if err != nil || value == \"\" {\n return fmt.Errorf(\"required config key missing: %s\", key)\n }\n }\n return nil\n}\n```\n\n## Phase 2: Dry-Run \u0026 Inspection Tools\n\nAdd `bd migrate --dry-run --json`:\n\n```json\n{\n \"pending_migrations\": [\n {\"name\": \"dirty_issues_table\", \"description\": \"Adds dirty_issues table\"},\n {\"name\": \"content_hash_column\", \"description\": \"Adds content_hash for collision resolution\"}\n ],\n \"current_state\": {\n \"schema_version\": \"0.9.9\",\n \"issue_count\": 247,\n \"config\": {\"schema_version\": \"0.9.9\"},\n \"missing_config\": [\"issue_prefix\"]\n },\n \"warnings\": [\n \"issue_prefix config not set - may break commands after migration\"\n ],\n \"invariants_to_check\": [\n \"required_config_present\",\n \"foreign_keys_valid\",\n \"issue_count_stable\"\n ]\n}\n```\n\nAdd `bd info --schema --json`:\n\n```json\n{\n \"tables\": [\"issues\", \"dependencies\", \"labels\", \"config\"],\n \"schema_version\": \"0.9.9\",\n \"config\": {},\n \"sample_issue_ids\": [\"mcp-1\", \"mcp-2\"],\n \"detected_prefix\": \"mcp\"\n}\n```\n\n## Phase 3: Pre/Post Snapshots with Rollback\n\nUpdate `RunMigrations()`:\n\n```go\nfunc RunMigrations(db *sql.DB) error {\n // Capture pre-migration snapshot\n snapshot := captureSnapshot(db)\n \n // Run migrations in transaction\n tx, err := db.Begin()\n if err != nil {\n return err\n }\n defer tx.Rollback()\n \n for _, migration := range migrations {\n if err := migration.Func(tx); err != nil {\n return fmt.Errorf(\"migration %s failed: %w\", migration.Name, err)\n }\n }\n \n // Verify invariants before commit\n if err := verifyInvariants(tx, snapshot); err != nil {\n return fmt.Errorf(\"post-migration validation failed (rolled back): %w\", err)\n }\n \n return tx.Commit()\n}\n```\n\n## Phase 4: MCP Tools for Agent Supervision\n\nAdd to beads-mcp:\n\n```python\n@server.tool()\nasync def inspect_migration(workspace_root: str) -\u003e dict:\n \"\"\"Get migration plan and current state for agent analysis.\n \n Agent should:\n 1. Review pending migrations\n 2. Check for warnings (missing config, etc.)\n 3. Verify invariants will pass\n 4. Decide whether to run bd migrate\n \"\"\"\n result = run_bd([\"migrate\", \"--dry-run\", \"--json\"], workspace_root)\n return json.loads(result.stdout)\n\n@server.tool() \nasync def get_schema_info(workspace_root: str) -\u003e dict:\n \"\"\"Get current database schema for migration analysis.\"\"\"\n result = run_bd([\"info\", \"--schema\", \"--json\"], workspace_root)\n return json.loads(result.stdout)\n```\n\n## Agent Workflow Example\n\n```python\n# Agent detects user wants to migrate\nmigration_plan = inspect_migration(\"/path/to/workspace\")\n\n# Agent analyzes (using its own reasoning, no API calls from beads)\nif \"issue_prefix\" in migration_plan[\"missing_config\"]:\n schema = get_schema_info(\"/path/to/workspace\")\n detected_prefix = schema[\"detected_prefix\"]\n \n # Agent fixes issue before migration\n run_bd([\"config\", \"set\", \"issue_prefix\", detected_prefix])\n \n# Now safe to migrate\nrun_bd([\"migrate\"])\n```\n\n## What Beads Provides\n\n✅ Deterministic validation (invariants)\n✅ Structured inspection (--dry-run, --explain)\n✅ Rollback on invariant failure\n✅ JSON output for agent parsing\n\n## What Beads Does NOT Do\n\n❌ No AI API calls\n❌ No external model access\n❌ No agent invocation\n\nAgents supervise migrations using their own reasoning and the inspection tools beads provides.","acceptance_criteria":"Phase 1: Migration invariants implemented and tested, checked after every migration, clear error messages when invariants fail.\n\nPhase 2: Snapshot capture before migrations, comparison after, rollback on verification failure.\n\nPhase 3 (stretch): AI validation optional flag implemented, AI can analyze migration code and generate custom validation queries.\n\nPhase 4 (stretch): Migration test fixtures created, all fixtures pass migrations, CI runs migration tests.","notes":"## Progress\n\n### ✅ Phase 1: Migration Invariants (COMPLETED)\n\n**Implemented:**\n- Created `internal/storage/sqlite/migration_invariants.go` with 3 invariants\n- Updated `RunMigrations()` to verify invariants after migrations\n- All tests pass ✓\n\n### ✅ Phase 2: Inspection Tools (COMPLETED)\n\n**Implemented:**\n1. ✅ `bd migrate --inspect --json` - Shows migration plan\n - Returns registered migrations with descriptions\n - Current database state (schema version, issue count, config)\n - Missing config detection\n - Warnings about potential issues\n - List of invariants to check\n\n2. ✅ `bd info --schema --json` - Returns schema details\n - Tables list\n - Schema version\n - Config values\n - Sample issue IDs\n - Detected prefix\n\n3. ✅ Migration warnings system\n4. ✅ Documentation updated in AGENTS.md\n5. ✅ All tests pass\n\n**Testing:**\n- All existing tests pass ✓\n- Manual testing confirms correct JSON output\n- Human-readable output works well\n\n**Note:** Oracle review suggested optimizations (read-only mode, dynamic tables, COUNT vs SearchIssues) but current implementation works well. Can optimize later if needed.\n\n### 🔲 Phase 3: MCP Tools (NEXT)\n\n**TODO:**\nWire up CLI commands in beads-mcp server.py:\n1. Add `inspect_migration()` tool - calls `bd migrate --inspect --json`\n2. Add `get_schema_info()` tool - calls `bd info --schema --json` \n3. Document agent workflow examples\n\n### 🔲 Phase 4: Documentation (FUTURE)\n\n- Document invariant system in EXTENDING.md\n- Add example agent migration workflow\n- Integration test simulating GH #201 scenario","status":"in_progress","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-02T12:57:10.722048-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T13:58:30.456786-08:00"} {"id":"bd-63e9","content_hash":"8d1221ee5222bd447de4dc51c2e1b12f2f61f474d5be2ef89455855f7f2f3b98","title":"Fix Nix flake build test failures","description":"Nix build is failing during test phase with same test errors as Windows.\n\n**Error:**\n```\nerror: Cannot build '/nix/store/rgyi1j44dm6ylrzlg2h3z97axmfq9hzr-beads-0.9.9.drv'.\nReason: builder failed with exit code 1.\nFAIL github.com/steveyegge/beads/cmd/bd 16.141s\n```\n\nThis may be related to test environment setup or the same issues affecting Windows tests.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-02T09:29:37.2851-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T09:29:37.2851-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-63e9","depends_on_id":"bd-1231","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-02T09:29:37.28618-08:00","created_by":"stevey"}]} {"id":"bd-64c05d00","content_hash":"b39e902f3ad38a806bbd2d9248ae97df1d940f4b363f9f5baf1faf53b8ed520d","title":"Multi-clone collision resolution testing and documentation","description":"Epic to track improvements to multi-clone collision resolution based on ultrathinking analysis of-3d844c58 and bd-71107098.\n\nCurrent state:\n- 2-clone collision resolution is SOUND and working correctly\n- Hash-based deterministic collision resolution works\n- Test fails due to timestamp comparison, not actual logic issues\n\nWork needed:\n1. Fix TestTwoCloneCollision to compare content not timestamps\n2. Add TestThreeCloneCollision for regression protection\n3. Document 3-clone ID non-determinism as known behavior","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-10-28T17:58:38.316626-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-31T19:38:09.209305-07:00"} {"id":"bd-64c05d00.1","content_hash":"0744c30a5397c6c44b949c038af110eaf6453ec3800bff55cb027eecc47ab5b5","title":"Fix TestTwoCloneCollision to compare content not timestamps","description":"The test at beads_twoclone_test.go:204-207 currently compares full JSON output including timestamps, causing false negative failures.\n\nCurrent behavior:\n- Both clones converge to identical semantic content\n- Clone A: test-2=\"Issue from clone A\", test-1=\"Issue from clone B\"\n- Clone B: test-1=\"Issue from clone B\", test-2=\"Issue from clone A\"\n- Titles match IDs correctly, no data corruption\n- Only timestamps differ (expected and acceptable)\n\nFix needed:\n- Replace exact JSON comparison with content-aware comparison\n- Normalize or ignore timestamp fields when asserting convergence\n- Test should PASS after this fix\n\nThis blocks completion of bd-71107098.","acceptance_criteria":"- Test compares issue content (title, description, status, priority) not timestamps\n- TestTwoCloneCollision passes\n- Both clones shown to have identical semantic content\n- Timestamps explicitly documented as acceptable difference","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T17:58:52.057194-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.226744-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-28T18:01:38.751895-07:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-64c05d00.1","depends_on_id":"bd-64c05d00","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-10-28T17:58:52.058202-07:00","created_by":"stevey"},{"issue_id":"bd-64c05d00.1","depends_on_id":"bd-71107098","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-10-28T17:58:52.05873-07:00","created_by":"stevey"}]}