From d1b880921a351eb21c7c48adc5e27abe323b193a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Yegge Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 17:21:41 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] bd sync: 2025-11-24 17:21:41 --- .beads/beads.jsonl | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/.beads/beads.jsonl b/.beads/beads.jsonl index 0fc424a3..3bc35899 100644 --- a/.beads/beads.jsonl +++ b/.beads/beads.jsonl @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ {"id":"bd-90v","content_hash":"9863bc4154603ebc58c4649f8a74b5508f8b30aae6db360e84485e2d7f19fb30","title":"bd prime: AI context loading and Claude Code integration","description":"Implement `bd prime` command and Claude Code hooks for context recovery. Hooks work with BOTH MCP server and CLI approaches - they solve the context memory problem (keeping bd workflow fresh after compaction) not the tool access problem (MCP vs CLI).","design":"## Epic Scope\n\nThis epic covers:\n1. Core `bd prime` command implementation with MCP-aware output\n2. Claude Code hooks via `bd setup claude` (works with MCP OR CLI)\n3. Automatic context recovery via SessionStart/PreCompact hooks\n4. `bd doctor` verification for Claude setup\n5. Documentation updates\n\n## Goals\n- Keep bd workflow fresh in agent context (prevent markdown TODO reversion)\n- Enable automatic context recovery after compaction/clear\n- Adapt to user's workflow preference (MCP vs CLI) automatically\n- Support multi-user projects (mixed Claude/non-Claude teams)\n- Verify setup with `bd doctor`\n\n## Architecture Understanding\n\n**MCP vs CLI is a user preference (not project-level):**\n- User installs MCP server globally → gets native bd tools\n- User doesn't install MCP → uses CLI via Bash tool\n- `bd prime` auto-detects which mode and adapts output\n- Same hooks work for all users regardless of preference\n\n**Hooks complement both approaches:**\n- **With MCP**: Hooks output workflow reminders (~500 tokens) - prevents forgetting to use MCP tools\n- **Without MCP**: Hooks output full CLI reference (~1-2k tokens) - provides command syntax\n- **Both cases**: Prevents markdown TODO reversion after compaction\n\n**Why hooks matter even with MCP:**\n- MCP tools can be forgotten after compaction\n- Hooks refresh \"use bd, not markdown\" reminder\n- PreCompact keeps bd workflow fresh in memory\n- Works in both MCP and CLI scenarios\n\n## Token Optimization\n\n**MCP mode** (~500 tokens):\n- Workflow reminders only\n- No CLI syntax (user has native tools)\n- References to MCP tool names\n\n**Non-MCP mode** (~1-2k tokens):\n- Full workflow rules\n- Complete CLI command reference\n- Examples and common patterns\n\n**Why adaptive output matters:**\n- MCP users waste tokens on CLI docs they don't need\n- Non-MCP users need full command reference\n- Same hook works for everyone, adapts automatically\n- Multi-user projects: each dev gets appropriate output for their setup\n\n## Out of Scope\n- Tip system infrastructure (separate epic)\n- Cursor/Windsurf integration (separate issues)\n- MCP server modifications","acceptance_criteria":"- `bd prime` command exists and outputs AI-optimized markdown\n- `bd setup claude` installs hooks and slash commands\n- Hooks auto-call `bd prime` when .beads/ detected\n- `bd doctor` verifies Claude integration\n- Documentation complete in AGENTS.md, README.md, QUICKSTART.md\n- All child issues closed","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-11T23:31:12.119012-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-12T00:11:07.743189-08:00","source_repo":"."} {"id":"bd-9dbq","content_hash":"3c462046931ba97960701c8b73ccbbbfbe74379b9e982b62b37a58d04354da4b","title":"Add transaction support for atomic issue creation","description":"Use Beads transaction API to create all issues atomically\n\nDesign:\nAdd a transaction-aware API to Beads Storage interface.\n\nApproach 1 (Recommended): RunInTransaction wrapper\n```go\n// In beads/storage.go\ntype Storage interface {\n // ... existing methods ...\n \n // RunInTransaction executes fn in a transaction\n // If fn returns error, transaction is rolled back\n // If fn returns nil, transaction is committed\n RunInTransaction(ctx context.Context, fn func(tx Transaction) error) error\n}\n\ntype Transaction interface {\n // Same methods as Storage, but use underlying *sql.Tx\n CreateIssue(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, actor string) error\n AddLabel(ctx context.Context, issueID, label, actor string) error\n AddDependency(ctx context.Context, dep *Dependency, actor string) error\n UpdateIssue(ctx context.Context, id string, updates map[string]interface{}, actor string) error\n // ... etc\n}\n```\n\nImplementation in sqlite/sqlite.go:\n```go\nfunc (s *SQLiteStorage) RunInTransaction(ctx context.Context, fn func(tx Transaction) error) error {\n tx, err := s.db.BeginTx(ctx, nil)\n if err != nil {\n return err\n }\n defer tx.Rollback() // Safe to call even after commit\n \n txStorage := \u0026transactionStorage{tx: tx, storage: s}\n if err := fn(txStorage); err != nil {\n return err\n }\n \n return tx.Commit()\n}\n\ntype transactionStorage struct {\n tx *sql.Tx\n storage *SQLiteStorage\n}\n\nfunc (t *transactionStorage) CreateIssue(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, actor string) error {\n // Same logic as storage.CreateIssue but use t.tx instead of s.db\n // ...\n}\n```\n\nApproach 2 (Alternative): Optional tx parameter\n```go\n// More invasive - requires changing all method signatures\nCreateIssue(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, actor string, tx ...*sql.Tx) error\n```\n\nPrefer Approach 1 - cleaner API and explicit transaction scope.\n\nNotes:\nContext from VC implementation (vc-apx8):\n\nThe VC plan approval code (internal/planning/approval.go) needs to create multiple issues atomically:\n1. Phase issues (chores)\n2. Task issues \n3. Dependencies between them\n4. Labels\n5. Mission metadata updates\n6. Plan deletion\n\nCurrent problem:\n- Each operation uses storage methods that get their own DB connections\n- Starting a transaction (db.BeginTx) and then calling storage methods causes deadlock\n- Storage methods try to acquire connections while transaction holds a lock\n\nWhat Beads needs:\n1. A transaction-aware API, either:\n - RunInTransaction(func(tx) error) pattern (preferred)\n - OR: All storage methods accept optional *sql.Tx parameter\n\n2. Example usage:\n err := store.RunInTransaction(ctx, func(tx Transaction) error {\n // All operations use tx instead of separate connections\n issue := \u0026Issue{...}\n if err := tx.CreateIssue(ctx, issue, actor); err != nil {\n return err // Triggers rollback\n }\n if err := tx.AddLabel(ctx, issue.ID, \"label\", actor); err != nil {\n return err // Triggers rollback\n }\n return nil // Triggers commit\n })\n\n3. The Transaction interface should expose same methods as Storage:\n - CreateIssue\n - AddLabel\n - AddDependency\n - UpdateMission\n - DeletePlan\n - etc.\n\nReference implementation:\n- See internal/storage/beads/wrapper.go for existing transaction examples\n- Lines 146, 236, 305 show BeginTx usage for migrations\n- But these are DDL operations, not issue CRUD\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n- WHEN creating issues in transaction THEN all succeed or all rollback\n- WHEN transaction commits THEN all issues exist in Beads\n- WHEN transaction rolls back THEN no issues exist","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-24T11:32:52.877111-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-24T11:32:52.877111-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-9dbq","depends_on_id":"bd-6pul","type":"related","created_at":"2025-11-24T11:37:44.948422-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} {"id":"bd-9e23","content_hash":"fa94af8126d5d8c816a6f83d5ad191ebdb954687abb87ce30e4f67eee4f1a9ce","title":"Optimize Memory backend GetIssueByExternalRef with index","description":"Currently GetIssueByExternalRef in Memory storage uses O(n) linear search through all issues.\n\nCurrent code (memory.go:282-308):\nfor _, issue := range m.issues {\n if issue.ExternalRef != nil \u0026\u0026 *issue.ExternalRef == externalRef {\n return \u0026issueCopy, nil\n }\n}\n\nProposed optimization:\n- Add externalRefToID map[string]string to MemoryStorage\n- Maintain it in CreateIssue, UpdateIssue, DeleteIssue\n- Achieve O(1) lookup like SQLite's index\n\nImpact: Low (--no-db mode typically has smaller datasets)\nRelated: bd-1022","status":"open","priority":4,"issue_type":"chore","created_at":"2025-11-02T15:32:30.242357-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T15:32:30.242357-08:00","source_repo":"."} -{"id":"bd-9li4","content_hash":"7ae7b885e82a2de333584c01f690dbc3ecb924603f18e316f5c91cc44e2256f8","title":"Create Docker image for Agent Mail","description":"Containerize Agent Mail server for easy deployment.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n- Dockerfile with Python 3.14\n- Health check endpoint\n- Volume mount for storage\n- Environment variable configuration\n- Multi-arch builds (amd64, arm64)\n\nFile: deployment/agent-mail/Dockerfile","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.231964-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.231964-08:00","source_repo":"."} +{"id":"bd-9li4","content_hash":"7ae7b885e82a2de333584c01f690dbc3ecb924603f18e316f5c91cc44e2256f8","title":"Create Docker image for Agent Mail","description":"Containerize Agent Mail server for easy deployment.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n- Dockerfile with Python 3.14\n- Health check endpoint\n- Volume mount for storage\n- Environment variable configuration\n- Multi-arch builds (amd64, arm64)\n\nFile: deployment/agent-mail/Dockerfile","status":"closed","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-07T22:43:43.231964-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-24T17:09:27.906102-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-24T17:09:27.906102-08:00","source_repo":"."} {"id":"bd-au0","content_hash":"755c63ab5b27bc77ee20034d16cc63614a0b3f10a81728f1bde5503cf6615813","title":"Command Set Standardization \u0026 Flag Consistency","description":"Comprehensive improvements to bd command set based on 2025 audit findings.\n\n## Background\nSee docs/command-audit-2025.md for detailed analysis.\n\n## Goals\n1. Standardize flag naming and behavior across all commands\n2. Add missing flags for feature parity\n3. Fix naming confusion\n4. Improve consistency in JSON output\n\n## Success Criteria\n- All mutating commands support --dry-run (no --preview variants)\n- bd update supports label operations\n- bd search has filter parity with bd list\n- Priority flags accept both int and P0-P4 format everywhere\n- JSON output is consistent across all commands","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-21T21:05:55.672749-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-21T21:05:55.672749-05:00","source_repo":"."} {"id":"bd-au0.10","content_hash":"50d18ebce621f3e83c512a74dcb66d98a6d7f67d6632d872a4278f0e46e4bb7a","title":"Add global verbosity flags (--verbose, --quiet)","description":"Add consistent verbosity controls across all commands.\n\n**Current state:**\n- bd init has --quiet flag\n- No other commands have verbosity controls\n- Debug output controlled by BD_VERBOSE env var\n\n**Proposal:**\nAdd persistent flags:\n- --verbose / -v: Enable debug output\n- --quiet / -q: Suppress non-essential output\n\n**Implementation:**\n- Add to rootCmd.PersistentFlags()\n- Replace BD_VERBOSE checks with flag checks\n- Standardize output levels:\n * Quiet: Errors only\n * Normal: Errors + success messages\n * Verbose: Errors + success + debug info\n\n**Files to modify:**\n- cmd/bd/main.go (add flags)\n- internal/debug/debug.go (respect flags)\n- Update all commands to respect quiet mode\n\n**Testing:**\n- Verify --verbose shows debug output\n- Verify --quiet suppresses normal output\n- Ensure errors always show regardless of mode","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-21T21:08:21.600209-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-21T21:08:21.600209-05:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-au0.10","depends_on_id":"bd-au0","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-21T21:08:21.602557-05:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} {"id":"bd-au0.5","content_hash":"add9038348d0512c29c42aaec387bee31f0657a5271fb10542fccd6f906d2339","title":"Add date and priority filters to bd search","description":"Add filter parity with bd list for consistent querying.\n\n**Missing filters to add:**\n- --priority, --priority-min, --priority-max\n- --created-after, --created-before\n- --updated-after, --updated-before\n- --closed-after, --closed-before\n- --empty-description, --no-assignee, --no-labels\n- --desc-contains, --notes-contains\n\n**Files to modify:**\n- cmd/bd/search.go\n- internal/rpc/protocol.go (SearchArgs)\n- internal/storage/storage.go (Search method)\n\n**Testing:**\n- All filter combinations\n- Date format parsing\n- Daemon and direct mode","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-21T21:07:05.496726-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-21T21:07:05.496726-05:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-au0.5","depends_on_id":"bd-au0","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-21T21:07:05.497762-05:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ {"id":"bd-c4rq","content_hash":"4c096e1d84c3ba5b5b4e107692b990a99166b4c99a4262fd26ec08297fb81046","title":"Refactor: Move staleness check inside daemon branch","description":"## Problem\n\nCurrently ensureDatabaseFresh() is called before the daemon mode check, but it checks daemonClient != nil internally and returns early. This is redundant.\n\n**Location:** All read commands (list.go:196, show.go:27, ready.go:102, status.go:80, etc.)\n\n## Current Pattern\n\nCall happens before daemon check, function checks daemonClient internally.\n\n## Better Pattern\n\nMove staleness check to direct mode branch only, after daemon check.\n\n## Impact\nLow - minor performance improvement (avoids one function call per command in daemon mode)\n\n## Effort\nMedium - requires refactoring 8 command files\n\n## Priority\nLow - can defer to future cleanup PR","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"chore","created_at":"2025-11-20T20:17:45.119583-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T20:17:45.119583-05:00","source_repo":"."} {"id":"bd-cb2f","content_hash":"99b9c1c19d5e9f38308d78f09763426777797f133d4c86edd579419e7ba4043f","title":"Week 1 task","description":"","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:11:59.358093-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:11:59.358093-08:00","source_repo":".","labels":["frontend","week2"]} {"id":"bd-dow9","content_hash":"5fa420f7eb64396bcd8a58626ae82209d9d75da474a03847d4fbaba76a953846","title":"Improve CheckStaleness error handling","description":"## Problem\n\nCheckStaleness returns 'false' (not stale) for multiple error conditions instead of returning errors. This masks problems.\n\n**Location:** internal/autoimport/autoimport.go:253-285\n\n## Edge Cases That Return False\n\n1. **Invalid last_import_time format** (line 259-262)\n - Corrupted metadata returns 'not stale'\n - Could show stale data\n\n2. **No JSONL file found** (line 267-277)\n - If glob fails, falls back to 'issues.jsonl'\n - If that's empty, returns 'not stale'\n\n3. **JSONL stat fails** (line 279-282)\n - Permission denied, file missing\n - Returns 'not stale' even though can't verify\n\n## Current Code\n\n```go\nlastImportTime, err := time.Parse(time.RFC3339, lastImportStr)\nif err \\!= nil {\n return false, nil // ← Should return error\n}\n\n// ...\n\nif jsonlPath == \"\" {\n return false, nil // ← Should return error\n}\n\nstat, err := os.Stat(jsonlPath)\nif err \\!= nil {\n return false, nil // ← Should return error\n}\n```\n\n## Fix\n\n```go\nlastImportTime, err := time.Parse(time.RFC3339, lastImportStr)\nif err \\!= nil {\n return false, fmt.Errorf(\"corrupted last_import_time: %w\", err)\n}\n\n// ...\n\nif jsonlPath == \"\" {\n return false, fmt.Errorf(\"no JSONL file found\")\n}\n\nstat, err := os.Stat(jsonlPath)\nif err \\!= nil {\n return false, fmt.Errorf(\"cannot stat JSONL: %w\", err)\n}\n```\n\n## Impact\nMedium - edge cases are rare but should be handled\n\n## Effort \n30 minutes - requires updating callers in RPC server\n\n## Dependencies\nRequires: bd-n4td (warning on errors)","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-20T20:16:45.658965-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T20:16:45.658965-05:00","source_repo":"."} -{"id":"bd-e166","content_hash":"000f4f9d069ffedceae13894d967ec30fa4a89e318bfcac4847f3c3b16d44a89","title":"Improve timestamp comparison readability in import","description":"The timestamp comparison logic uses double-negative which can be confusing:\n\nCurrent code:\nif !incoming.UpdatedAt.After(existing.UpdatedAt) {\n // skip update\n}\n\nMore readable:\nif incoming.UpdatedAt.After(existing.UpdatedAt) {\n // perform update\n} else {\n // skip (local is newer)\n}\n\nThis is a minor refactor for code clarity.\n\nRelated: bd-1022\nFiles: internal/importer/importer.go:411, 488","status":"open","priority":4,"issue_type":"chore","created_at":"2025-11-02T15:32:12.27108-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-02T15:32:12.27108-08:00","source_repo":"."} +{"id":"bd-e166","content_hash":"000f4f9d069ffedceae13894d967ec30fa4a89e318bfcac4847f3c3b16d44a89","title":"Improve timestamp comparison readability in import","description":"The timestamp comparison logic uses double-negative which can be confusing:\n\nCurrent code:\nif !incoming.UpdatedAt.After(existing.UpdatedAt) {\n // skip update\n}\n\nMore readable:\nif incoming.UpdatedAt.After(existing.UpdatedAt) {\n // perform update\n} else {\n // skip (local is newer)\n}\n\nThis is a minor refactor for code clarity.\n\nRelated: bd-1022\nFiles: internal/importer/importer.go:411, 488","status":"closed","priority":4,"issue_type":"chore","created_at":"2025-11-02T15:32:12.27108-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-24T17:15:21.18451-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-24T17:15:21.18451-08:00","source_repo":"."} {"id":"bd-e92","content_hash":"12073b3293b06f99051bc9c00188aeb520cd2e4792cf4694f1fa4b784e625e54","title":"Add test coverage for internal/autoimport package","description":"","design":"The autoimport package has only 1 test file. Need comprehensive tests. Target: 70% coverage","acceptance_criteria":"- At least 3 test files\n- Package coverage \u003e= 70%\n- Tests cover main functionality, error paths, edge cases","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:22.338577-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:22.338577-05:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-e92","depends_on_id":"bd-ge7","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:31.128625-05:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} {"id":"bd-ee1","content_hash":"e1e4cca5bc204aebf1f387fbc386f6f9b2b2d19a11ebc4d01f866292bd100198","title":"Add security tests for WriteFile permissions in doctor command","description":"Test coverage gap identified by automated analysis (vc-217).\n\n**Original Issue:** [deleted:[deleted:[deleted:bd-da96-baseline-lint]]]\n\nIn cmd/bd/doctor/gitignore.go:98, os.WriteFile uses 0644 permissions, flagged by gosec G306 as potentially too permissive.\n\nAdd tests to verify:\n- File is created with appropriate permissions (0600 or less)\n- Existing file permissions are not loosened\n- File ownership is correct\n- Sensitive data handling if .gitignore contains secrets\n\nThis ensures .gitignore files are created with secure permissions to prevent unauthorized access.\n\n_This issue was automatically created by AI test coverage analysis._","acceptance_criteria":"- Tests written for uncovered functionality\n- Test coverage verified\n- All tests passing","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","assignee":"ai-supervisor","created_at":"2025-11-21T10:25:33.529153-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-24T17:01:24.378275-08:00","source_repo":".","labels":["discovered:supervisor"]} {"id":"bd-ge7","content_hash":"84248781654b9924e1f4284058f141b73d761dead05ef9a3d1cc9b9f8cd4b60d","title":"Improve Beads test coverage from 46% to 80%","description":"","design":"Currently at 46% test coverage. Need to systematically improve coverage across all subsystems, focusing first on packages with minimal or no tests.\n\nTarget: 80% overall coverage\n\nApproach:\n- Break down by subsystem (internal/* packages)\n- Prioritize packages with 0-1 test files\n- Each child issue targets specific coverage goals\n- Focus on unit tests for core logic, error paths, and edge cases\n\nThis epic will be executed by the VC executor to test its ability to handle sustained multi-issue work.","acceptance_criteria":"- Overall test coverage reaches 80% or higher\n- All internal/* packages have at least 60% coverage\n- All packages with only 1 test file now have at least 3 test files\n- Quality gates (go test, golangci-lint) pass\n- Tests are maintainable and test actual behavior, not implementation details","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:03.700271-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:03.700271-05:00","source_repo":"."} @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ {"id":"bd-t3b","content_hash":"c32a3a0f2f836148033fb330e209ac22e06dbecf18894153c15e2036f5afae1c","title":"Add test coverage for internal/config package","description":"","design":"Config package has 1 test file. Need comprehensive tests. Target: 70% coverage","acceptance_criteria":"- At least 3 test files\n- Package coverage \u003e= 70%","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:22.91657-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:22.91657-05:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-t3b","depends_on_id":"bd-ge7","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-20T21:21:31.201036-05:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} {"id":"bd-tbz3","content_hash":"ac416dd2c873a4abb653dfbb689464834000b0c11410c09adf0efb2396a33c48","title":"bd init UX Improvements","description":"bd init leaves users with incomplete setup, requiring manual bd doctor --fix. Issues found: (1) git hooks not installed if user declines prompt, (2) no auto-migration when CLI is upgraded, (3) stale merge driver configs from old versions. Fix by making bd init more robust with better defaults and auto-migration.","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-21T23:16:00.333543-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-21T23:16:37.811233-08:00","source_repo":"."} {"id":"bd-tru","content_hash":"0de12031088519a3dcd27968d6bf17eb3a92d1853264e5a0dceef3310b3a2b04","title":"Update documentation for bd prime and Claude integration","description":"Update AGENTS.md, README.md, and QUICKSTART.md to document the new `bd prime` command, `bd setup claude` command, and tip system.","design":"## Documentation Updates\n\n### AGENTS.md\nAdd new section \"Context Recovery\":\n```markdown\n## Context Recovery\n\n### The Problem\nAfter context compaction or clearing conversation, AI agents may forget to use Beads and revert to markdown TODOs. Claude Code hooks solve this.\n\n### bd prime Command\nThe `bd prime` command outputs essential Beads workflow context in AI-optimized markdown format (~1-2k tokens).\n\n**When to use:**\n- After context compaction\n- After clearing conversation\n- Starting new session\n- When agent seems to forget bd workflow\n- Manual context refresh\n\n**Usage:**\n```bash\nbd prime # Output workflow context\n```\n\n### Automatic Integration (Recommended)\n\nRun `bd setup claude` to install hooks that auto-refresh bd context:\n- **SessionStart hook**: Loads context in new sessions\n- **PreCompact hook**: Refreshes context before compaction (survives better)\n- **Works with MCP**: Hooks complement MCP server (not replace)\n- **Works without MCP**: bd prime provides workflow via CLI\n\n**Why hooks matter even with MCP:**\n- MCP provides native tools, but agent may forget to use them\n- Hooks keep \"use bd, not markdown\" fresh in context\n- PreCompact refreshes workflow before compaction\n\n### MCP Server vs bd prime\n\n**Not an either/or choice** - they solve different problems:\n\n| Aspect | MCP Server | bd prime | Both |\n|--------|-----------|----------|------|\n| **Purpose** | Native bd tools | Workflow context | Best of both |\n| **Tokens** | 10.5k always loaded | ~1-2k when called | 10.5k + ~2k |\n| **Tool access** | Function calls | CLI via Bash | Function calls |\n| **Context memory** | Can fade after compaction | Hooks keep fresh | Hooks + tools |\n| **Recommended** | Heavy usage | Token optimization | Best experience |\n\n**Setup options:**\n```bash\nbd setup claude # Install hooks (works with or without MCP)\nbd setup claude --local # Per-project only\nbd setup claude --remove # Remove hooks\n```\n```\n\n### README.md\nAdd to \"Getting Started\" section:\n```markdown\n### AI Agent Integration\n\n**Claude Code users:** Run `bd setup claude` to install automatic context recovery hooks.\n\nHooks work with both MCP server and CLI approaches, preventing agents from forgetting bd workflow after compaction.\n\n**MCP vs bd prime:**\n- **With MCP server**: Hooks keep agent using bd tools (prevents markdown TODO reversion)\n- **Without MCP server**: Hooks provide workflow context via `bd prime` (~1-2k tokens)\n```\n\n### QUICKSTART.md\nAdd section on agent integration:\n```markdown\n## For AI Agents\n\n**Context loading:**\n```bash\nbd prime # Load workflow context (~1-2k tokens)\n```\n\n**Automatic setup (Claude Code):**\n```bash\nbd setup claude # Install hooks for automatic context recovery\n```\n\nHooks prevent agents from forgetting bd workflow after compaction.\n```","acceptance_criteria":"- AGENTS.md has Context Recovery section\n- README.md mentions bd setup claude\n- QUICKSTART.md mentions bd prime\n- Examples show when to use bd prime vs MCP\n- Clear comparison of trade-offs","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-11T23:30:22.77349-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-11T23:45:23.242658-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-tru","depends_on_id":"bd-90v","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-11T23:31:35.277819-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]} -{"id":"bd-ufny","content_hash":"e91676db7930ad2f04145ce7bb6d438d2ade056750d78974c55577a4cc0409b7","title":"First-class git worktree support","description":"## Motivation\n\nBeads should be a first-class citizen in git worktree environments like gastown/town, where multiple worktrees share the same repository but work on different branches simultaneously.\n\nCurrent state: Worktrees trigger a warning suggesting --no-daemon, but this is a bandaid, not a solution. MCP integration requires daemon mode, so worktree users are second-class citizens.\n\n## The Core Problem\n\nGit worktrees create a fundamental mismatch:\n- Multiple checkouts share one .beads/ directory (tracked in git)\n- One SQLite database (gitignored local cache)\n- One daemon per .beads/ path\n- Daemon doesn't know which worktree is calling it\n- Sync commits can go to the wrong branch\n\n## Use Cases\n\n1. **Gastown/Town Pattern**: One project, multiple named worktrees (polecats), all sharing issues\n2. **Solo Developer**: Main + feature branch worktrees, issues visible across all\n3. **Team**: Multiple developers using worktrees, syncing via git\n\n## Key Insight\n\nIssues are PROJECT-level, not BRANCH-level. An issue created in BlackRoad worktree is still relevant to RedTanker. The JSONL is shared via git. The database is just a local cache.\n\n## Proposed Solution: Per-Worktree Daemon with Shared Database\n\n### 1. Auto-Detect Worktree Environment\n```go\nfunc DetectWorktreeMode() WorktreeMode {\n gitDir := exec(\"git rev-parse --git-dir\")\n commonDir := exec(\"git rev-parse --git-common-dir\")\n if gitDir != commonDir {\n return WorktreeModeDetected\n }\n return WorktreeModeNormal\n}\n```\n\n### 2. Worktree Identity in Daemon\n- Socket path includes worktree name: `.beads/bd-{worktree-name}.sock`\n- Each worktree gets its own daemon process\n- All daemons share SQLite with proper WAL-mode locking\n- Each daemon knows its worktree's current branch\n\n### 3. Auto-Initialize on First Access\nWhen bd runs in worktree without local database:\n1. Detect worktree mode\n2. Find shared .beads/issues.jsonl\n3. Create/update local SQLite cache\n4. Auto-detect prefix from existing JSONL issues\n5. Start worktree-aware daemon\n6. No \"bd init\" ceremony needed\n\n### 4. Worktree-Aware Sync\nOptions (configurable):\n- **Per-branch**: Each daemon commits to its worktree's current branch\n- **Unified**: All daemons commit to a shared \"beads-sync\" branch\n\n### 5. Graceful Degradation\nIf worktree complexity detected and daemon can't handle it:\n- Warn once (not every command)\n- Auto-fallback to no-daemon mode\n- Fully functional, just no auto-sync\n\n## Implementation Phases\n\n### Phase 1: Better Detection \u0026 Auto-Fallback\n- Improved worktree detection\n- Single clear warning with actionable advice\n- Auto-set BEADS_NO_DAEMON in worktrees by default\n- Add --worktree-mode flag to override\n\n### Phase 2: Auto-Init\n- When JSONL exists but no DB, auto-initialize\n- Infer prefix from existing issues (already works in bd init)\n- Eliminate \"bd init\" requirement for fresh worktree clones\n\n### Phase 3: Per-Worktree Daemons\n- Socket/lock naming with worktree identity\n- Daemon startup detects and records worktree context\n- Proper WAL-mode locking for concurrent DB access\n- RPC includes worktree context\n\n### Phase 4: Worktree-Aware Sync\n- Config option: sync-mode: per-branch | unified\n- Branch-aware commit routing\n- Handle merge conflicts gracefully\n- Test with gastown multi-polecat setup\n\n## Files to Modify\n\n- `cmd/bd/main.go`: Database discovery, worktree detection\n- `cmd/bd/daemon.go`: Socket path generation with worktree ID\n- `cmd/bd/daemon_sync_branch.go`: Branch routing per worktree\n- `cmd/bd/worktree.go`: Enhanced detection, auto-fallback logic\n- `cmd/bd/init.go`: Auto-init when JSONL exists\n- `internal/daemon/discovery.go`: Find daemons per worktree\n- `internal/beads/discover.go`: Worktree-aware DB discovery\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n1. Running `bd list` in a fresh gastown worktree \"just works\" (no bd init needed)\n2. Multiple worktrees can run daemons simultaneously without conflict\n3. MCP integration works in worktree environments\n4. Sync commits go to correct branch (or configured sync branch)\n5. No scary warnings for supported worktree configurations\n\n## References\n\n- gastown issue: gt-t8q (Support git worktree environments natively)\n- Current worktree warning: cmd/bd/worktree.go warnWorktreeDaemon()\n- Existing WorktreeManager: internal/git/worktree.go","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-24T16:27:31.381177-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-24T16:27:31.381177-08:00","source_repo":"."} +{"id":"bd-ufny","content_hash":"e91676db7930ad2f04145ce7bb6d438d2ade056750d78974c55577a4cc0409b7","title":"First-class git worktree support","description":"## Motivation\n\nBeads should be a first-class citizen in git worktree environments like gastown/town, where multiple worktrees share the same repository but work on different branches simultaneously.\n\nCurrent state: Worktrees trigger a warning suggesting --no-daemon, but this is a bandaid, not a solution. MCP integration requires daemon mode, so worktree users are second-class citizens.\n\n## The Core Problem\n\nGit worktrees create a fundamental mismatch:\n- Multiple checkouts share one .beads/ directory (tracked in git)\n- One SQLite database (gitignored local cache)\n- One daemon per .beads/ path\n- Daemon doesn't know which worktree is calling it\n- Sync commits can go to the wrong branch\n\n## Use Cases\n\n1. **Gastown/Town Pattern**: One project, multiple named worktrees (polecats), all sharing issues\n2. **Solo Developer**: Main + feature branch worktrees, issues visible across all\n3. **Team**: Multiple developers using worktrees, syncing via git\n\n## Key Insight\n\nIssues are PROJECT-level, not BRANCH-level. An issue created in BlackRoad worktree is still relevant to RedTanker. The JSONL is shared via git. The database is just a local cache.\n\n## Proposed Solution: Per-Worktree Daemon with Shared Database\n\n### 1. Auto-Detect Worktree Environment\n```go\nfunc DetectWorktreeMode() WorktreeMode {\n gitDir := exec(\"git rev-parse --git-dir\")\n commonDir := exec(\"git rev-parse --git-common-dir\")\n if gitDir != commonDir {\n return WorktreeModeDetected\n }\n return WorktreeModeNormal\n}\n```\n\n### 2. Worktree Identity in Daemon\n- Socket path includes worktree name: `.beads/bd-{worktree-name}.sock`\n- Each worktree gets its own daemon process\n- All daemons share SQLite with proper WAL-mode locking\n- Each daemon knows its worktree's current branch\n\n### 3. Auto-Initialize on First Access\nWhen bd runs in worktree without local database:\n1. Detect worktree mode\n2. Find shared .beads/issues.jsonl\n3. Create/update local SQLite cache\n4. Auto-detect prefix from existing JSONL issues\n5. Start worktree-aware daemon\n6. No \"bd init\" ceremony needed\n\n### 4. Worktree-Aware Sync\nOptions (configurable):\n- **Per-branch**: Each daemon commits to its worktree's current branch\n- **Unified**: All daemons commit to a shared \"beads-sync\" branch\n\n### 5. Graceful Degradation\nIf worktree complexity detected and daemon can't handle it:\n- Warn once (not every command)\n- Auto-fallback to no-daemon mode\n- Fully functional, just no auto-sync\n\n## Implementation Phases\n\n### Phase 1: Better Detection \u0026 Auto-Fallback\n- Improved worktree detection\n- Single clear warning with actionable advice\n- Auto-set BEADS_NO_DAEMON in worktrees by default\n- Add --worktree-mode flag to override\n\n### Phase 2: Auto-Init\n- When JSONL exists but no DB, auto-initialize\n- Infer prefix from existing issues (already works in bd init)\n- Eliminate \"bd init\" requirement for fresh worktree clones\n\n### Phase 3: Per-Worktree Daemons\n- Socket/lock naming with worktree identity\n- Daemon startup detects and records worktree context\n- Proper WAL-mode locking for concurrent DB access\n- RPC includes worktree context\n\n### Phase 4: Worktree-Aware Sync\n- Config option: sync-mode: per-branch | unified\n- Branch-aware commit routing\n- Handle merge conflicts gracefully\n- Test with gastown multi-polecat setup\n\n## Files to Modify\n\n- `cmd/bd/main.go`: Database discovery, worktree detection\n- `cmd/bd/daemon.go`: Socket path generation with worktree ID\n- `cmd/bd/daemon_sync_branch.go`: Branch routing per worktree\n- `cmd/bd/worktree.go`: Enhanced detection, auto-fallback logic\n- `cmd/bd/init.go`: Auto-init when JSONL exists\n- `internal/daemon/discovery.go`: Find daemons per worktree\n- `internal/beads/discover.go`: Worktree-aware DB discovery\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n1. Running `bd list` in a fresh gastown worktree \"just works\" (no bd init needed)\n2. Multiple worktrees can run daemons simultaneously without conflict\n3. MCP integration works in worktree environments\n4. Sync commits go to correct branch (or configured sync branch)\n5. No scary warnings for supported worktree configurations\n\n## References\n\n- gastown issue: gt-t8q (Support git worktree environments natively)\n- Current worktree warning: cmd/bd/worktree.go warnWorktreeDaemon()\n- Existing WorktreeManager: internal/git/worktree.go","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-24T16:27:31.381177-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-24T17:09:19.292311-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-24T17:09:19.292311-08:00","source_repo":"."} {"id":"bd-ut5","content_hash":"d9b4ee9c7748c28dc2cd436911b1bee39e68e82df99b718ebe57a246f72a6bcb","title":"Test label update feature","description":"","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-21T22:07:25.488849-05:00","updated_at":"2025-11-21T22:07:25.488849-05:00","source_repo":".","labels":["test-direct"]} {"id":"bd-wcl","content_hash":"c08d62ce3627a49126c63f6a630a08c1666e5b1b8d9148ae0c72d7d06611b2a9","title":"Document CLI + hooks as recommended approach over MCP","description":"Update documentation to position CLI + bd prime hooks as the primary recommended approach over MCP server, explaining why minimizing context matters even with large context windows (compute cost, energy, environment, latency).","design":"## Goals\n\nPosition CLI + `bd prime` hooks as the **primary recommended approach** for AI agent integration, with MCP server as a legacy/fallback option.\n\nExplore **hybrid mode** - if certain commands benefit from MCP (UX/DX advantages like no approval prompts), minimize MCP surface area to only those commands.\n\nThis requires production validation first - only update docs after CLI mode is proven reliable.\n\n## Why Minimize Context (Even With Large Windows)\n\n**Context window size ≠ free resource**\n\nLarge context windows (100k+, 200k+) don't mean we should fill them wastefully. Every token in context has real costs:\n\n### Compute Cost\n- **Processing overhead**: Larger context = more GPU/CPU cycles per request\n- **Memory usage**: 10.5k tokens consume significant RAM/VRAM\n- **Scaling impact**: Multiplied across all users, all sessions, all requests\n\n### Energy \u0026 Environment\n- **Electricity**: More compute = more power consumption\n- **Carbon footprint**: Data centers running on grid power (not all renewable)\n- **Sustainability**: Unnecessary token usage contributes to AI's environmental impact\n- **Responsibility**: Efficient tools are better for the planet\n\n### User Experience\n- **Latency**: Larger context = slower processing (noticeable at 10k+ tokens)\n- **Cost**: Many AI services charge per token (input + output)\n- **Rate limits**: Context counts against API quotas\n\n### Engineering Excellence\n- **Efficiency**: Good engineering minimizes resource usage\n- **Scalability**: Efficient tools scale better\n- **Best practices**: Optimize for the common case\n\n**The comparison:**\n\n| Approach | Standing Context | Efficiency | User Cost | Environmental Impact |\n|----------|-----------------|------------|-----------|---------------------|\n| **CLI + hooks** | ~1-2k tokens | 80-90% reduction | Lower | Sustainable ✓ |\n| **MCP minimal** | ~2-4k tokens | 60-80% reduction | Medium | Better ✓ |\n| **MCP full** | ~10.5k tokens | Baseline | Higher | Wasteful ✗ |\n\n**Functional equivalence:**\n- CLI via Bash tool works just as well as MCP native calls\n- Same features, same reliability\n- No downside except initial learning curve\n\n## Hybrid Mode: Minimal MCP Surface Area\n\n**Philosophy:** MCP server doesn't have to expose everything.\n\nIf certain commands have legitimate UX/DX benefits from MCP (e.g., no approval prompts, cleaner syntax), we can expose ONLY those commands via MCP while using CLI for everything else.\n\n### Potential MCP-Only Candidates (TBD)\n\nCommands that might benefit from MCP native calls:\n- `ready` - frequently checked, no side effects, approval prompt annoying\n- `show` - read-only, frequently used, approval slows workflow\n- `list` - read-only, no risk, approval adds friction\n\nCommands that work fine via CLI:\n- `create` - complex parameters, benefits from explicit confirmation\n- `update` - state changes, good to see command explicitly\n- `close` - state changes, explicit is better\n- `dep` - relationships, good to see what's being linked\n- `sync` - git operations, definitely want visibility\n\n### Token Budget\n\n**Full MCP** (current): ~10.5k tokens\n- All ~20+ bd commands exposed\n- All parameter schemas\n- All descriptions and examples\n\n**Minimal MCP** (proposed): ~2-4k tokens\n- 3-5 high-frequency read commands only\n- Simplified schemas\n- Minimal descriptions\n- Everything else via CLI\n\n**Pure CLI**: ~1-2k tokens (only on SessionStart/PreCompact)\n- No MCP tools loaded\n- All commands via Bash\n\n### Investigation Required\n\nBefore implementing hybrid mode, validate:\n\n1. **Do MCP calls actually skip approval prompts?**\n - Test with Claude Code approval settings\n - Compare MCP tool calls vs Bash tool calls\n - Measure UX difference in real usage\n\n2. **What's the actual token breakdown per command?**\n - Measure individual command schemas\n - Calculate token savings for minimal vs full\n\n3. **Is approval prompt the only benefit?**\n - Are there other UX advantages to MCP?\n - Does native syntax actually improve experience?\n - User testing with both approaches\n\n4. **Can we dynamically load MCP tools?**\n - Only load MCP when certain commands needed?\n - Hot-swap between CLI and MCP?\n - Probably not - MCP loads at startup\n\n### Hybrid Mode Documentation (If Validated)\n\n```markdown\n## Choosing Your Integration Approach\n\nBeads supports three AI agent integration approaches:\n\n### CLI + Hooks (Recommended - Most Efficient)\n\n**Setup:** `bd setup claude`\n\nUses Claude Code hooks to inject workflow context via `bd prime` command. Agent uses bd via Bash tool.\n\n**Tokens:** ~1-2k (on SessionStart/PreCompact only)\n\n**Pros:**\n- Maximum efficiency (80-90% reduction vs full MCP)\n- Lowest compute/energy usage\n- Same functionality as MCP\n\n**Cons:**\n- Bash tool calls may require approval prompts\n- Slightly more verbose in conversation\n\n### Minimal MCP + Hooks (Balanced)\n\n**Setup:** Install minimal MCP server (read-only commands) + `bd setup claude`\n\nExposes only high-frequency read commands via MCP (ready, show, list). Everything else via CLI.\n\n**Tokens:** ~2-4k MCP + ~1-2k hooks\n\n**Pros:**\n- 60-80% reduction vs full MCP\n- No approval prompts for common queries\n- Cleaner syntax for frequent operations\n- Still efficient\n\n**Cons:**\n- Requires MCP server (additional setup)\n- Mixed interface (some MCP, some CLI)\n\n### Full MCP + Hooks (Legacy)\n\n**Setup:** Install full MCP server + `bd setup claude`\n\n**Tokens:** ~10.5k MCP + hooks\n\n**Pros:**\n- All commands as native function calls\n- Consistent interface\n\n**Cons:**\n- Highest token usage (worst for compute/energy/cost)\n- Slowest processing\n- Less sustainable\n\n### Recommendation\n\n1. **Start with CLI + hooks** - most efficient, works great\n2. **Try minimal MCP** if approval prompts become annoying\n3. **Avoid full MCP** - wasteful with no significant benefit\n```\n\n## Production Validation Checklist\n\nBefore making these documentation changes, validate CLI approach works reliably:\n\n### Phase 1: Pure CLI Validation\n- [ ] `bd prime` implemented and tested\n- [ ] Hooks installed and working in Claude Code\n- [ ] Real-world usage by at least 2-3 developers for 1+ weeks\n- [ ] No significant usability issues reported\n- [ ] Agent successfully uses bd via Bash tool\n- [ ] Document which commands (if any) have approval prompt issues\n\n### Phase 2: Hybrid Mode Investigation (Optional)\n- [ ] Test if MCP calls skip approval prompts vs Bash calls\n- [ ] Measure token cost per MCP command\n- [ ] Identify minimal set of commands worth exposing via MCP\n- [ ] Build minimal MCP server variant\n- [ ] Validate token savings (should be 60-80% vs full MCP)\n- [ ] User testing shows actual UX improvement\n\n### Phase 3: Documentation Update\n- [ ] Update based on validation results\n- [ ] Include measured token counts (not estimates)\n- [ ] Provide clear migration paths\n- [ ] Update `bd doctor` recommendations\n\n## Migration Guide (Optional)\n\nFor users currently using MCP:\n\n```markdown\n### Migrating from Full MCP to CLI + Hooks\n\nAlready using full MCP server? You can switch to the more efficient CLI approach:\n\n1. Install hooks: `bd setup claude`\n2. Test it works (hooks inject context, agent uses Bash tool)\n3. Remove MCP server from `~/.claude/settings.json`\n4. Restart Claude Code\n\nYou'll get the same functionality with 80-90% less token usage.\n\n### Migrating to Minimal MCP (If Available)\n\nIf you find approval prompts annoying for certain commands:\n\n1. Replace full MCP with minimal MCP in `~/.claude/settings.json`\n2. Restart Claude Code\n3. Verify high-frequency commands (ready, show, list) work via MCP\n4. Everything else automatically uses CLI\n\nYou'll get 60-80% token reduction vs full MCP while keeping the UX benefits.\n```\n\n## Files to Update\n\n- `README.md` - Add recommendation in AI Integration section\n- `AGENTS.md` - Add \"Choosing Your Integration Approach\" section early\n- `QUICKSTART.md` - Update AI integration section\n- `docs/` - Any other AI integration docs if they exist\n- `mcp-server/` - Create minimal variant if hybrid validated\n\n## Future: Update `bd init`\n\nOnce validated, update `bd init` to:\n- Default to recommending `bd setup claude` (hooks only)\n- Mention minimal MCP as option for UX improvement\n- Detect existing full MCP and suggest migration\n- Provide token usage estimates for each approach\n\n## MCP Server Architecture Note\n\n**Key insight:** MCP server doesn't have to expose all bd functionality.\n\nCurrent design exposes ~20+ commands (all bd subcommands). This is over-engineered.\n\n**Better design:**\n- **Minimal MCP**: 3-5 read-only commands (~2-4k tokens)\n- **CLI**: Everything else via Bash tool\n- **Hooks**: Context injection via `bd prime`\n\nThis achieves best of both worlds:\n- Low token usage (efficient)\n- No approval prompts for common queries (UX)\n- Explicit visibility for state changes (safety)\n\nIf validation shows NO meaningful benefit to MCP (even minimal), skip hybrid mode entirely and recommend pure CLI.","acceptance_criteria":"- Documentation explains CLI + hooks as recommended approach\n- Explains why context size matters (compute/energy/cost/latency)\n- Token comparison table shows 80-90% reduction\n- Migration guide for existing MCP users\n- Only deployed AFTER production validation\n- Clear that both approaches are supported","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-12T00:15:25.923025-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-12T00:18:16.786857-08:00","source_repo":"."} {"id":"bd-wv9l","content_hash":"20e7b00ef310100af01a9bb27a074dd3faa7183ee48d04916d342c7e49476464","title":"Code Review Sweep: thorough","description":"Perform thorough code review sweep based on accumulated activity.\n\n**AI Reasoning:**\nSignificant code activity with 7608 lines added and 120 files changed indicates substantial modifications. Multiple high-churn areas (cmd/bd, internal/rpc) suggest potential for subtle issues and emerging patterns that warrant review.\n\n**Scope:** thorough\n**Target Areas:** cmd/bd, internal/rpc, .beads\n**Estimated Files:** 12\n**Estimated Cost:** $5\n\n**Task:**\nReview files for non-obvious issues that agents miss during focused work:\n- Inefficiencies (algorithmic, resource usage)\n- Subtle bugs (race conditions, off-by-one, copy-paste)\n- Poor patterns (coupling, complexity, duplication)\n- Missing best practices (error handling, docs, tests)\n- Unnamed anti-patterns\n\nFile discovered issues with detailed reasoning and suggestions.","acceptance_criteria":"- Reviewed target files for code quality issues\n- Filed discovered issues with detailed reasoning\n- Completed sweep according to scope criteria","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-21T23:23:16.056392-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-21T23:23:16.056392-08:00","source_repo":".","labels":["code-review-sweep","review-area:.beads","review-area:cmd/bd","review-area:internal/rpc"]}