Make merge command idempotent for safe retry after partial failures (bd-26)
- Added mergeResult struct to track operations (added vs skipped) - Check if source issues already closed before attempting to close - Track dependencies migrated vs already existed - Count text references updated - Display detailed breakdown of operations in output - Updated help text to clarify idempotent behavior - Added comprehensive tests for idempotent retry scenarios
This commit is contained in:
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
|
||||
{"id":"bd-23","title":"Implement bd quickstart command","description":"Add bd quickstart command to show context-aware repo information: recent issues, database location, configured prefix, example queries. Helps AI agents understand current project state. Companion to bd onboard.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-10-21T23:53:44.31362-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-22T11:56:36.513862-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-24","title":"Add customizable time threshold for compact command","description":"Currently compact uses fixed 30-day and 90-day tiers. Add support for custom time thresholds like '--older-than 60h' or '--older-than 2.5d' to allow more flexible compaction policies.\n\nExamples:\n bd compact --all --older-than 60h\n bd compact --all --older-than 2.5d\n bd compact --all --tier 1 --age 48h\n\nThis would allow users to set their own compaction schedules based on their workflow needs.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-10-21T23:53:44.31362-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-22T11:56:36.514114-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-25","title":"Add --id flag to bd list for filtering by specific issue IDs","description":"","design":"Add --id flag accepting comma-separated IDs. Usage: bd list --id wy-11,wy-12. Combines with other filters. From filter-flag-design.md.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-10-21T23:53:44.31362-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-22T11:56:36.514386-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-26","title":"Make merge command idempotent for safe retry after partial failures","description":"The merge command currently performs 3 operations without an outer transaction:\n1. Migrate dependencies from source → target\n2. Update text references across all issues\n3. Close source issues\n\nIf merge fails mid-operation (network issue, daemon crash, etc.), a retry will fail or produce incorrect results because some operations already succeeded.\n\n**Goal:** Make merge idempotent so retrying after partial failure is safe and completes the remaining work.\n\n**Idempotency checks needed:**\n- Skip dependency migration if target already has the dependency\n- Skip text reference updates if already updated\n- Skip closing source issues if already closed\n- Report which operations were skipped vs performed\n\n**Example output:**\n```\n✓ Merged 2 issue(s) into bd-78\n - Dependencies: 3 migrated, 2 already existed\n - Text references: 5 updated, 0 already correct\n - Source issues: 1 closed, 1 already closed\n```\n\n**Related:** bd-23 originally requested transaction support, but idempotency is a better solution for this use case since individual operations are already atomic.","design":"Current merge code already has some idempotency:\n- Dependency migration checks `alreadyExists` before adding (line ~145-151 in merge.go)\n- Text reference updates are naturally idempotent (replacing bd-X with bd-Y twice has same result)\n\nMissing idempotency:\n- CloseIssue fails if source already closed\n- Error messages don't distinguish \"already done\" from \"real failure\"\n\nImplementation:\n1. Check source issue status before closing - skip if already closed\n2. Track which operations succeeded/skipped\n3. Return detailed results for user visibility\n4. Consider adding --dry-run output showing what would be done vs skipped","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-10-21T23:53:44.31362-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-22T11:56:36.514681-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-26","title":"Make merge command idempotent for safe retry after partial failures","description":"The merge command currently performs 3 operations without an outer transaction:\n1. Migrate dependencies from source → target\n2. Update text references across all issues\n3. Close source issues\n\nIf merge fails mid-operation (network issue, daemon crash, etc.), a retry will fail or produce incorrect results because some operations already succeeded.\n\n**Goal:** Make merge idempotent so retrying after partial failure is safe and completes the remaining work.\n\n**Idempotency checks needed:**\n- Skip dependency migration if target already has the dependency\n- Skip text reference updates if already updated\n- Skip closing source issues if already closed\n- Report which operations were skipped vs performed\n\n**Example output:**\n```\n✓ Merged 2 issue(s) into bd-78\n - Dependencies: 3 migrated, 2 already existed\n - Text references: 5 updated, 0 already correct\n - Source issues: 1 closed, 1 already closed\n```\n\n**Related:** bd-23 originally requested transaction support, but idempotency is a better solution for this use case since individual operations are already atomic.","design":"Current merge code already has some idempotency:\n- Dependency migration checks `alreadyExists` before adding (line ~145-151 in merge.go)\n- Text reference updates are naturally idempotent (replacing bd-X with bd-Y twice has same result)\n\nMissing idempotency:\n- CloseIssue fails if source already closed\n- Error messages don't distinguish \"already done\" from \"real failure\"\n\nImplementation:\n1. Check source issue status before closing - skip if already closed\n2. Track which operations succeeded/skipped\n3. Return detailed results for user visibility\n4. Consider adding --dry-run output showing what would be done vs skipped","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-10-21T23:53:44.31362-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-22T12:01:51.907044-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-22T12:01:51.907044-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-27","title":"bd sync crashes with nil pointer when daemon is running","description":"The 'bd sync' command crashes with a nil pointer dereference when the daemon is running.\n\n**Reproduction:**\n```bash\n# With daemon running\n./bd sync\n```\n\n**Error:**\n```\npanic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference\n[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x2 addr=0x120 pc=0x1012314ac]\n\ngoroutine 1 [running]:\nmain.exportToJSONL({0x1014ec2e0, 0x101a49900}, {0x14000028db0, 0x30})\n /Users/stevey/src/fred/beads/cmd/bd/sync.go:245 +0x4c\n```\n\n**Root cause:**\nThe sync command's `exportToJSONL` function directly accesses `store.SearchIssues()` at line 245, but when daemon mode is active, the global `store` variable is nil. The sync command should either:\n1. Use daemon RPC when daemon is running, or\n2. Force direct mode for sync operations\n\n**Workaround:**\nUse `--no-daemon` flag: `bd sync --no-daemon`","status":"closed","priority":0,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-10-21T23:53:44.31362-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-22T11:56:36.514963-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-22T00:09:12.615536-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-28","title":"Add cross-repo issue references (future enhancement)","description":"Support referencing issues across different beads repositories. Useful for tracking dependencies between separate projects.\n\nProposed syntax:\n- Local reference: bd-78 (current behavior)\n- Cross-repo by path: ~/src/other-project#bd-456\n- Cross-repo by workspace name: @project2:bd-789\n\nUse cases:\n1. Frontend project depends on backend API issue\n2. Shared library changes blocking multiple projects\n3. System administrator tracking work across machines\n4. Monorepo with separate beads databases per component\n\nImplementation challenges:\n- Storage layer needs to query external databases\n- Dependency resolution across repos\n- What if external repo not available?\n- How to handle in JSONL export/import?\n- Security: should repos be able to read others?\n\nDesign questions to resolve first:\n1. Read-only references vs full cross-repo dependencies?\n2. How to handle repo renames/moves?\n3. Absolute paths vs workspace names vs git remotes?\n4. Should bd-77 auto-discover related repos?\n\nRecommendation: \n- Gather user feedback first\n- Start with read-only references\n- Implement as plugin/extension?\n\nContext: This is mentioned in bd-77 as approach #2. Much more complex than daemon multi-repo approach. Only implement if there's strong user demand.\n\nPriority: Backlog (4) - wait for user feedback before designing","status":"closed","priority":4,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-10-21T23:53:44.31362-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-22T11:56:36.515219-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-20T22:00:31.966891-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-29","title":"Document merge command and AI integration","description":"Update README, AGENTS.md with merge command examples. Document AI agent duplicate detection workflow.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-21T23:53:44.31362-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-22T11:56:36.515478-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-22T11:37:41.104918-07:00"}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user