diff --git a/.beads/beads.jsonl b/.beads/beads.jsonl
index bf181477..c388be3e 100644
--- a/.beads/beads.jsonl
+++ b/.beads/beads.jsonl
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
 {"id":"bd-1f28","content_hash":"850a14659d6747dc114b7da94e55c3f9594995cabc31c3c85e3089fbd5f61712","title":"Extract migration functions to migrations.go","description":"Move migrateDirtyIssuesTable, migrateExternalRefColumn, migrateCompositeIndexes, migrateClosedAtConstraint, migrateCompactionColumns, migrateSnapshotsTable, migrateCompactionConfig, migrateCompactedAtCommitColumn, migrateExportHashesTable, migrateContentHashColumn to a separate migrations.go file","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-01T19:28:54.892045-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-01T20:00:09.038174-07:00","closed_at":"2025-11-01T20:00:09.038178-07:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-1f64","content_hash":"80f404d7c0f06c7f4bc6d52ac02c1a002a95ac7cb60c6485b2ceed5e013dad75","title":"Add comprehensive tests for config.yaml issue-prefix migration","description":"The GH #209 config.yaml migration lacks test coverage:\n\nMissing tests:\n- config.SetIssuePrefix() edge cases (empty file, comments, malformed YAML)\n- config.GetIssuePrefix() with various config states\n- MigrateConfigToYAML() automatic migration logic\n- bd init writing to config.yaml instead of DB\n- bd migrate DB→config.yaml migration path\n\nTest scenarios needed:\n1. SetIssuePrefix with empty config.yaml\n2. SetIssuePrefix with existing config.yaml (preserves other settings)\n3. SetIssuePrefix with commented issue-prefix line\n4. SetIssuePrefix atomic write (temp file cleanup)\n5. GetIssuePrefix fallback behavior\n6. MigrateConfigToYAML when config.yaml missing prefix but DB has it\n7. MigrateConfigToYAML when both missing (detect from issues)\n8. MigrateConfigToYAML when config.yaml already has prefix (no-op)\n9. Integration test: fresh bd init writes to config.yaml only\n10. Integration test: upgrade from v0.21 DB migrates to config.yaml\n\nPriority 1 because this is a user-facing migration affecting all users upgrading to v0.22.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T22:33:43.08753-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T22:46:16.306565-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T22:46:16.306565-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-1ls","content_hash":"af79708476d560abaac3cbe9c537bcf43c2100dcb1d676954ea604486f75d199","title":"Override test","description":"## Overview\n\n[Describe the high-level goal and scope of this epic]\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- [ ] Criteria 1\n- [ ] Criteria 2\n- [ ] Criteria 3\n\n## Background\n\n[Provide context and motivation]\n\n## Scope\n\n**In Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n\n**Out of Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n","design":"## Architecture\n\n[Describe the overall architecture and approach]\n\n## Components\n\n- Component 1: [description]\n- Component 2: [description]\n\n## Dependencies\n\n[List external dependencies or constraints]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] All child issues are completed\n- [ ] Integration tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation is updated\n- [ ] Code review completed\n","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:10.01471-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T22:07:10.946574-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T22:07:10.946574-08:00","source_repo":".","labels":["epic"]}
-{"id":"bd-1vv","content_hash":"1db907ddb55edaf7a4c06a566c4e1b8244fcd9ba5d7e2fca4d5c053e424ac515","title":"Add WebSocket support","description":"## Feature Request\n\n[Describe the desired feature]\n\n## Motivation\n\n[Why is this feature needed? What problem does it solve?]\n\n## Use Cases\n\n1. **Use Case 1**: [description]\n2. **Use Case 2**: [description]\n\n## Proposed Solution\n\n[High-level approach to implementing this feature]\n\n## Alternatives Considered\n\n- **Alternative 1**: [description and why not chosen]\n- **Alternative 2**: [description and why not chosen]\n","design":"## Technical Design\n\n[Detailed technical approach]\n\n## API Changes\n\n[New commands, flags, or APIs]\n\n## Data Model Changes\n\n[Database schema changes if any]\n\n## Implementation Notes\n\n- Note 1\n- Note 2\n\n## Testing Strategy\n\n- Unit tests: [scope]\n- Integration tests: [scope]\n- Manual testing: [steps]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] Feature implements all described use cases\n- [ ] All tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation updated (README, commands)\n- [ ] Examples added if applicable\n- [ ] No performance regressions\n","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:56:41.271215-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:56:41.271215-08:00","source_repo":".","labels":["feature"]}
 {"id":"bd-1yi5","content_hash":"f79a57405ce5e0b0a2edba770937fb86df0b955b568bc066e0673845e33e40d5","title":"Use -short flag in CI for PR checks","description":"Update CI configuration to use -short flag for PR checks, run full tests nightly.\n\nThe slow tests already support testing.Short() and will be skipped.\n\nExpected savings: ~20 seconds for PR checks (fast tests only)\n\nImplementation:\n- Update .github/workflows/ci.yml to add -short flag for PR tests\n- Create/update nightly workflow for full test runs\n- Update README/docs about test strategy\n\nFile: .github/workflows/ci.yml:30","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:17.279618-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T10:25:10.616119-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-04T10:25:10.616119-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-1yi5","depends_on_id":"bd-l5gq","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:17.280453-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
 {"id":"bd-23a8","content_hash":"7c54bea4624429ff0842a192489979e0a1eafdd872027a0934b1a1d9b0e80d33","title":"Test simple issue","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T17:11:04.464726-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T11:10:23.529727-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-04T11:10:23.529731-08:00","source_repo":".","comments":[{"id":6,"issue_id":"bd-23a8","author":"stevey","text":"Testing the new bd comment alias!","created_at":"2025-11-05T08:44:27Z"},{"id":7,"issue_id":"bd-23a8","author":"stevey","text":"Another test with JSON output","created_at":"2025-11-05T08:44:27Z"},{"id":8,"issue_id":"bd-23a8","author":"stevey","text":"Test comment from file\n","created_at":"2025-11-05T08:44:27Z"}]}
 {"id":"bd-248bdc3e","content_hash":"8eaeb2dbef1ed6b25fc1bcf3bc5cd1b38a5cf5a487772558ba9fe12a149978f3","title":"Add optional post-merge git hook example for bd sync","description":"Create example git hook that auto-runs bd sync after git pull/merge.\n\nAdd to examples/git-hooks/:\n- post-merge hook that checks if .beads/issues.jsonl changed\n- If changed: run `bd sync` automatically\n- Make it optional/documented (not auto-installed)\n\nBenefits:\n- Zero-friction sync after git pull\n- Complements auto-detection as belt-and-suspenders\n\nNote: post-merge hook already exists for pre-commit/post-merge. Extend it to support sync.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-25T22:47:14.668842-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.218887-07:00","source_repo":"."}
@@ -169,7 +168,6 @@
 {"id":"bd-c825f867","content_hash":"27cecaa2dc6cdabb2ae77fd65fbf8dca8f4c536bdf140a13b25cdd16376c9845","title":"Add docs/architecture/event_driven.md","description":"Copy event_driven_daemon.md into docs/ folder. Add to documentation index.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.431399-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.221939-07:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-c9a482db","content_hash":"35c1ad124187c21b4e8dae7db46ea5d00173d33234a9b815ded7dcf0ab51078e","title":"Add internal/ai package for AI-assisted repairs","description":"Add AI integration package to support AI-powered repair commands.\n\nProviders:\n- Anthropic (Claude)\n- OpenAI\n- Ollama (local)\n\nFeatures:\n- Conflict resolution analysis\n- Duplicate detection via embeddings\n- Configuration via env vars (BEADS_AI_PROVIDER, BEADS_AI_API_KEY, etc.)\n\nSee repair_commands.md lines 357-425 for design.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T19:37:55.722841-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-30T17:12:58.180177-07:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-caa9","content_hash":"aa97994c8474a1380ff7f9c9db681c6d6dda62839b1ddc13312a6813029b6404","title":"Migration tool for existing users","description":"Ensure smooth migration for existing users to separate branch workflow.\n\nTasks:\n- Add bd migrate --separate-branch command\n- Detect existing repos, migrate cleanly\n- Preserve git history\n- Add rollback mechanism\n- Test migration on beads' own repo (dogfooding)\n- Communication plan (GitHub discussion, docs)\n- Version compatibility checks\n\nEstimated effort: 2-3 days","acceptance_criteria":"- Existing users can migrate without data loss\n- Rollback works if migration fails\n- Clear communication about breaking changes (if any)\n- beads project itself migrated successfully (dogfooding)\n- Migration tested on 5+ real-world repos","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T15:22:35.627388-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T12:36:53.789201-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-04T12:36:53.789201-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-caa9","depends_on_id":"bd-a101","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2025-11-02T15:22:48.382619-08:00","created_by":"stevey"}]}
-{"id":"bd-cb2f","content_hash":"99b9c1c19d5e9f38308d78f09763426777797f133d4c86edd579419e7ba4043f","title":"Week 1 task","description":"","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:11:59.358093-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:11:59.358093-08:00","source_repo":".","labels":["frontend","week2"]}
 {"id":"bd-cc03","content_hash":"f1e8dcfd29cd9830ae91a044a799a750085fc9139e822c656b0575fa132b9bfa","title":"Build Node.js CLI wrapper for WASM","description":"Create npm package that wraps bd.wasm. Child of epic bd-44d0.\n\n## Tasks\n- [ ] Set up npm package structure (package.json)\n- [ ] Implement CLI argument parsing\n- [ ] Load and execute WASM module\n- [ ] Handle stdout/stderr correctly\n- [ ] Support --json flag for all commands\n- [ ] Add bd-wasm bin script\n\n## Success Criteria\n- bd-wasm ready --json works identically to bd\n- All core commands supported","status":"closed","priority":0,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-02T18:33:31.310268-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T00:55:48.758194-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T00:55:48.758198-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-cc03","depends_on_id":"bd-197b","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-02T18:33:31.311017-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
 {"id":"bd-cc4f","content_hash":"bf918bc22aedff9e04e09591d0469cdf508345a91a28b66f8ac2e35ab5c05949","title":"Implement TryResurrectParent function","description":"Create internal/storage/sqlite/resurrection.go with TryResurrectParent(ctx, parentID) function. Parse JSONL history to find deleted parent, create tombstone with status=deleted and is_tombstone=true flag. Handle recursive resurrection for multi-level missing parents (bd-abc.1.2 with missing bd-abc and bd-abc.1).","status":"closed","priority":0,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T12:31:59.61107-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T00:08:42.813998-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T00:08:42.814-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-cdf7","content_hash":"50ba3c5bc3a0f06ebd20dd9b373086e0ecd218eea56a9edbef321f4e042115a4","title":"Add tests for DetectCycles to improve coverage from 29.6%","description":"DetectCycles currently has 29.6% coverage. Need comprehensive tests for:\n- Simple cycles (A-\u003eB-\u003eA)\n- Complex multi-node cycles\n- Acyclic graphs (should not detect cycles)\n- Self-loops\n- Multiple independent cycles\n- Edge cases (empty graph, single node)","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-01T22:40:58.977156-07:00","updated_at":"2025-11-01T22:52:02.243223-07:00","closed_at":"2025-11-01T22:52:02.243223-07:00","source_repo":"."}
@@ -223,7 +221,6 @@
 {"id":"bd-o43","content_hash":"da285ab01b4f4bce19f609b006c338d268fd520f103594b37c43d339f3e3a79e","title":"Add richer query capabilities to bd list","description":"Current bd list filters are limited to basic field matching (status, priority, type, assignee, label). This forces users to resort to piping through jq for common queries.\n\nMissing query capabilities:\n- Pattern matching: --title-contains, --desc-contains\n- Date ranges: --created-after, --updated-before, --closed-after\n- Empty/null checks: --empty-description, --no-assignee, --no-labels\n- Numeric ranges: --priority-min, --priority-max\n- Complex boolean logic: --and, --or operators\n- Full-text search: --search across all text fields\n- Negation: --not-status, --exclude-label\n\nExample use cases:\n- Find issues with empty descriptions\n- Find stale issues not updated in 30 days\n- Find high-priority bugs with no assignee\n- Search for keyword across title/description/notes\n\nImplementation approach:\n- Add query builder pattern to storage layer\n- Support --query DSL for complex queries\n- Keep simple flags for common cases\n- Add --json output for programmatic use","notes":"## Progress Update\n\n**Completed:**\n- ✅ Extended IssueFilter struct with new fields (pattern matching, date ranges, empty/null checks, priority ranges)\n- ✅ Updated SQLite SearchIssues implementation  \n- ✅ Added CLI flags to list.go\n- ✅ Added parseTimeFlag helper\n- ✅ Comprehensive tests added - all passing\n\n**Remaining:**\n- ⚠️ RPC layer needs updating (internal/rpc/protocol.go ListArgs)\n- ⚠️ Daemon handler needs to forward new filters\n- ⚠️ End-to-end testing with daemon mode\n- 📝 Documentation updates\n\n**Files Modified:**\n- internal/types/types.go\n- internal/storage/sqlite/sqlite.go  \n- cmd/bd/list.go\n- cmd/bd/list_test.go\n\n**Next Steps:**\n1. Update RPC protocol\n2. Update daemon handler  \n3. Test with daemon mode\n4. Update docs","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-05T00:17:48.677493-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T00:33:38.998433-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T00:33:38.998433-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-pdwz","content_hash":"f76d63fc1bef4ab993800f94abc68e2fa717bc4932a65ee226414917d8654090","title":"Add t.Parallel() to slow hash multiclone tests","description":"Add t.Parallel() to TestHashIDs_MultiCloneConverge and TestHashIDs_IdenticalContentDedup so they run concurrently.\n\nExpected savings: ~10 seconds (from 20s to ~11s)\n\nImplementation:\n- Add t.Parallel() call at start of each test function\n- Verify tests don't share resources that would cause conflicts\n- Run tests to confirm they work in parallel\n\nFile: beads_hash_multiclone_test.go:34, :101","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:15.705228-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-04T09:52:31.945545-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-04T09:52:31.945545-08:00","source_repo":".","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-pdwz","depends_on_id":"bd-l5gq","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-04T01:24:15.706149-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
 {"id":"bd-ry1u","content_hash":"b566c54bd06360dbc38709cfb93040c8da04abf0309269bd8b4ee3710a9a4099","title":"Publish official devcontainer configuration","description":"","design":"Problem: GH issue #229 shows git hooks aren't available in devcontainers because bd CLI isn't installed. Solution: Provide official .devcontainer/devcontainer.json that installs Go, builds bd from source, runs bd init --quiet, and installs hooks automatically. Benefits: New contributors start immediately, AI assistants work out-of-box, no manual setup. Implementation: Create .devcontainer/devcontainer.json with Go feature, postCreateCommand to build bd and install hooks, environment variables. Acceptance: Container builds with bd installed, hooks functional, documentation updated, tested with Codespaces and VSCode.","notes":"Devcontainer configuration implemented. Manual testing required in actual devcontainer environment (Codespaces or VSCode Remote Containers). All code changes complete, tests pass, linting clean.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-05T15:02:21.783666-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T17:46:42.70998-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T17:46:42.70998-08:00","source_repo":"."}
-{"id":"bd-s02","content_hash":"911d456e4dabae028dd615b643c99058ef12e55ea523cb81cc933783c7b13546","title":"Manual task","description":"","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:10.022202-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:10.022202-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-u8j","content_hash":"962eba2362141bb73be8375626997f1d6ab91b76d691f11f23593a964b036995","title":"Clarify exclusive lock protocol compatibility with multi-repo","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md proposes per-repo file locking (Decision #7) using flock on JSONL files. However, VC (a downstream library consumer) uses an exclusive lock protocol (vc-195, requires Beads v0.17.3+) that allows bd daemon and VC executor to coexist.\n\nNeed to clarify:\n- Does the proposed per-repo file locking work with VC's existing exclusive lock protocol?\n- Do library consumers like VC need to adapt their locking logic?\n- Can multiple repos be locked atomically for cross-repo operations?\n\nContext: contributor-workflow-analysis.md lines 662-681","acceptance_criteria":"- Documentation explicitly states compatibility or incompatibility with existing lock protocols\n- If incompatible, migration path is documented for library consumers\n- If compatible, example showing coexistence is provided","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:08.257493-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T14:15:01.506885-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T14:15:01.506885-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-wta","content_hash":"b72f31183e057a3ccb8b428f40475921570d47ed61b50d2bb4875829757d6b2c","title":"Add performance benchmarks for multi-repo hydration","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md asserts sub-second queries (line 702) and describes smart caching via file mtime tracking (Decision #4, lines 584-618), but doesn't provide concrete performance benchmarks.\n\nVC's requirement (from VC feedback section):\n- Executor polls GetReadyWork() every 5-10 seconds\n- Queries must be sub-second (ideally \u003c100ms)\n- Smart caching must avoid re-parsing JSONLs on every query\n\nSuggested performance targets to validate:\n- File stat overhead: \u003c1ms per repo\n- Hydration (when needed): \u003c500ms for typical JSONL (\u003c25k)\n- Query (from cache): \u003c10ms\n- Total GetReadyWork(): \u003c100ms (VC's requirement)\n\nAlso test at scale:\n- N=1 repo (baseline)\n- N=3 repos (typical)\n- N=10 repos (edge case)\n\nThese benchmarks are critical for library consumers like VC that run automated polling loops.","acceptance_criteria":"- Performance benchmark suite created for multi-repo hydration\n- Benchmarks cover file stat, hydration, and query times\n- Tests at N=1, N=3, N=10 repo scales\n- Results documented in contributor-workflow-analysis.md\n- Performance targets met or issues filed for optimization","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:39.331528-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T14:17:15.079226-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T14:17:15.079226-08:00","source_repo":"."}
 {"id":"bd-x47","content_hash":"0b5f05ca037293f7be36f9a080da731e67bec96ba68e2b7cbeb589cc60343225","title":"Add guidance for self-hosting projects","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md is optimized for OSS contributors making PRs to upstream projects. However, it doesn't address projects like VC that use beads for their own development (self-hosting).\n\nSelf-hosting projects differ from OSS contributors:\n- No upstream/downstream distinction (they ARE the project)\n- May run automated executors (not just humans)\n- In bootstrap/early phase (stability matters)\n- Single team/owner (not multiple contributors with permissions)\n\nGuidance needed on:\n- When self-hosting projects should stay single-repo (default, recommended)\n- When they should adopt multi-repo (team planning, multi-phase dev)\n- How automated executors should handle multi-repo (if at all)\n- Special considerations for projects in bootstrap phase\n\nExamples of self-hosting projects: VC (building itself with beads), internal tools, pet projects","acceptance_criteria":"- Section added: 'For Projects Using Beads for Self-Hosting'\n- Clear guidance on when to stay single-repo vs adopt multi-repo\n- Recommendations for automated executor behavior with multi-repo\n- Bootstrap phase considerations documented","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:27.805341-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-05T14:16:34.69662-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-05T14:16:34.69662-08:00","source_repo":"."}