* feat(ready,blocked): Add --parent flag for scoping by epic/bead descendants
Add --parent flag to `bd ready` and `bd blocked` CLI commands and MCP tools
to filter results to all descendants of a specific epic or bead.
## Backward Compatibility
- CLI: New optional --parent flag; existing usage unchanged
- RPC: New `blocked` operation added (was missing); existing operations unchanged
- MCP: New optional `parent` parameter; existing calls work as before
- Storage interface: GetBlockedIssues signature changed to accept WorkFilter
- All callers updated to pass empty filter for existing behavior
- Empty WorkFilter{} returns identical results to previous implementation
## Implementation Details
SQLite uses recursive CTE to traverse parent-child hierarchy:
WITH RECURSIVE descendants AS (
SELECT issue_id FROM dependencies
WHERE type = 'parent-child' AND depends_on_id = ?
UNION ALL
SELECT d.issue_id FROM dependencies d
JOIN descendants dt ON d.depends_on_id = dt.issue_id
WHERE d.type = 'parent-child'
)
SELECT issue_id FROM descendants
MemoryStorage implements equivalent recursive traversal with visited-set
cycle protection via collectDescendants helper.
Parent filter composes with existing filters (priority, labels, assignee, etc.)
as an additional WHERE clause - all filters are AND'd together.
## RPC Blocked Support
MCP beads_blocked() existed but daemon client raised NotImplementedError.
Added OpBlocked and handleBlocked to enable daemon RPC path, which was
previously broken. Now both CLI and daemon clients work for blocked queries.
## Changes
- internal/types/types.go: Add ParentID *string to WorkFilter
- internal/storage/sqlite/ready.go: Add recursive CTE for parent filtering
- internal/storage/memory/memory.go: Add getAllDescendants/collectDescendants
- internal/storage/storage.go: Update GetBlockedIssues interface signature
- cmd/bd/ready.go: Add --parent flag to ready and blocked commands
- internal/rpc/protocol.go: Add OpBlocked constant and BlockedArgs type
- internal/rpc/server_issues_epics.go: Add handleBlocked RPC handler
- internal/rpc/client.go: Add Blocked client method
- integrations/beads-mcp/: Add BlockedParams model and parent parameter
## Usage
bd ready --parent bd-abc # All ready descendants
bd ready --parent bd-abc --priority 1 # Combined with other filters
bd blocked --parent bd-abc # All blocked descendants
## Testing
Added 4 test cases for parent filtering:
- TestParentIDFilterDescendants: Verifies recursive traversal (grandchildren)
- TestParentIDWithOtherFilters: Verifies composition with priority filter
- TestParentIDWithBlockedDescendants: Verifies blocked issues excluded from ready
- TestParentIDEmptyParent: Verifies empty result for childless parent
* fix: Correct blockedCmd indentation and suppress gosec false positive
- Fix syntax error from incorrect indentation in blockedCmd Run function
- Add nolint:gosec comment for GetBlockedIssues SQL formatting (G201)
The filterSQL variable contains only parameterized WHERE clauses with
? placeholders, not user input
235 lines
6.4 KiB
Go
235 lines
6.4 KiB
Go
package main
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"path/filepath"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/steveyegge/beads/internal/types"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// TestRelateCommand tests the bd relate command functionality.
|
|
// This is a regression test for Decision 004 Phase 4 - relates-to links
|
|
// are now stored in the dependencies table.
|
|
func TestRelateCommand(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tmpDir := t.TempDir()
|
|
testDB := filepath.Join(tmpDir, ".beads", "beads.db")
|
|
s := newTestStore(t, testDB)
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
|
|
t.Run("relate creates bidirectional link", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Create two issues
|
|
issue1 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-relate-1",
|
|
Title: "Issue 1",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
CreatedAt: time.Now(),
|
|
}
|
|
issue2 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-relate-2",
|
|
Title: "Issue 2",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
CreatedAt: time.Now(),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := s.CreateIssue(ctx, issue1, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("CreateIssue failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := s.CreateIssue(ctx, issue2, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("CreateIssue failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Simulate what bd relate does: add bidirectional relates-to
|
|
dep1 := &types.Dependency{
|
|
IssueID: issue1.ID,
|
|
DependsOnID: issue2.ID,
|
|
Type: types.DepRelatesTo,
|
|
}
|
|
if err := s.AddDependency(ctx, dep1, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("AddDependency (1->2) failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
dep2 := &types.Dependency{
|
|
IssueID: issue2.ID,
|
|
DependsOnID: issue1.ID,
|
|
Type: types.DepRelatesTo,
|
|
}
|
|
if err := s.AddDependency(ctx, dep2, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("AddDependency (2->1) failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Verify bidirectional link exists
|
|
deps1, err := s.GetDependenciesWithMetadata(ctx, issue1.ID)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("GetDependenciesWithMetadata failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
found1to2 := false
|
|
for _, d := range deps1 {
|
|
if d.ID == issue2.ID && d.DependencyType == types.DepRelatesTo {
|
|
found1to2 = true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if !found1to2 {
|
|
t.Errorf("issue1 should have relates-to link to issue2")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
deps2, err := s.GetDependenciesWithMetadata(ctx, issue2.ID)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("GetDependenciesWithMetadata failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
found2to1 := false
|
|
for _, d := range deps2 {
|
|
if d.ID == issue1.ID && d.DependencyType == types.DepRelatesTo {
|
|
found2to1 = true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if !found2to1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("issue2 should have relates-to link to issue1")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("unrelate removes bidirectional link", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Create two issues
|
|
issue1 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-unrelate-1",
|
|
Title: "Issue 1",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
CreatedAt: time.Now(),
|
|
}
|
|
issue2 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-unrelate-2",
|
|
Title: "Issue 2",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
CreatedAt: time.Now(),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := s.CreateIssue(ctx, issue1, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("CreateIssue failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := s.CreateIssue(ctx, issue2, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("CreateIssue failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Add bidirectional relates-to
|
|
dep1 := &types.Dependency{
|
|
IssueID: issue1.ID,
|
|
DependsOnID: issue2.ID,
|
|
Type: types.DepRelatesTo,
|
|
}
|
|
if err := s.AddDependency(ctx, dep1, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("AddDependency (1->2) failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
dep2 := &types.Dependency{
|
|
IssueID: issue2.ID,
|
|
DependsOnID: issue1.ID,
|
|
Type: types.DepRelatesTo,
|
|
}
|
|
if err := s.AddDependency(ctx, dep2, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("AddDependency (2->1) failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Simulate what bd unrelate does: remove both directions
|
|
if err := s.RemoveDependency(ctx, issue1.ID, issue2.ID, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("RemoveDependency (1->2) failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := s.RemoveDependency(ctx, issue2.ID, issue1.ID, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("RemoveDependency (2->1) failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Verify links are gone
|
|
deps1, err := s.GetDependenciesWithMetadata(ctx, issue1.ID)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("GetDependenciesWithMetadata failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
for _, d := range deps1 {
|
|
if d.ID == issue2.ID && d.DependencyType == types.DepRelatesTo {
|
|
t.Errorf("issue1 should NOT have relates-to link to issue2 after unrelate")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
deps2, err := s.GetDependenciesWithMetadata(ctx, issue2.ID)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("GetDependenciesWithMetadata failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
for _, d := range deps2 {
|
|
if d.ID == issue1.ID && d.DependencyType == types.DepRelatesTo {
|
|
t.Errorf("issue2 should NOT have relates-to link to issue1 after unrelate")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("relates-to does not block", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Create two issues
|
|
issue1 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-noblock-1",
|
|
Title: "Issue 1",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
CreatedAt: time.Now(),
|
|
}
|
|
issue2 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-noblock-2",
|
|
Title: "Issue 2",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
CreatedAt: time.Now(),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := s.CreateIssue(ctx, issue1, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("CreateIssue failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := s.CreateIssue(ctx, issue2, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("CreateIssue failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Add relates-to (not blocks)
|
|
dep := &types.Dependency{
|
|
IssueID: issue1.ID,
|
|
DependsOnID: issue2.ID,
|
|
Type: types.DepRelatesTo,
|
|
}
|
|
if err := s.AddDependency(ctx, dep, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("AddDependency failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Issue1 should NOT be blocked (relates-to doesn't block)
|
|
blocked, err := s.GetBlockedIssues(ctx, types.WorkFilter{})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("GetBlockedIssues failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
for _, b := range blocked {
|
|
if b.ID == issue1.ID {
|
|
t.Errorf("issue1 should NOT be blocked by relates-to dependency")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestRelateCommandInit tests that the relate and unrelate commands are properly initialized.
|
|
func TestRelateCommandInit(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if relateCmd == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("relateCmd should be initialized")
|
|
}
|
|
if relateCmd.Use != "relate <id1> <id2>" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Expected Use='relate <id1> <id2>', got %q", relateCmd.Use)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if unrelateCmd == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("unrelateCmd should be initialized")
|
|
}
|
|
if unrelateCmd.Use != "unrelate <id1> <id2>" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Expected Use='unrelate <id1> <id2>', got %q", unrelateCmd.Use)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|