Files
beads/internal/storage/sqlite/blocked_cache_test.go
Steve Yegge fa9a88e2a3 feat: add waits-for dependency type for fanout gates (bd-xo1o.2)
Adds 'waits-for' dependency type for dynamic molecule bonding:
- DepWaitsFor blocks an issue until spawner's children are closed
- Two gate types: all-children (wait for all) or any-children (first)
- Updated blocked_cache.go CTE to handle waits-for dependencies
- Added --waits-for and --waits-for-gate flags to bd create command
- Added WaitsForMeta struct for gate metadata storage
- Full test coverage for all gate types and dynamic child scenarios

This enables patrol molecules to wait for dynamically-bonded arms to
complete before proceeding (Christmas Ornament pattern).

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-23 04:00:00 -08:00

646 lines
24 KiB
Go

package sqlite
import (
"context"
"strconv"
"testing"
"github.com/steveyegge/beads/internal/types"
)
// getCachedBlockedIssues returns the set of issue IDs currently in blocked_issues_cache
func getCachedBlockedIssues(t *testing.T, store *SQLiteStorage) map[string]bool {
t.Helper()
ctx := context.Background()
rows, err := store.db.QueryContext(ctx, "SELECT issue_id FROM blocked_issues_cache")
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Failed to query blocked_issues_cache: %v", err)
}
defer rows.Close()
cached := make(map[string]bool)
for rows.Next() {
var issueID string
if err := rows.Scan(&issueID); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Failed to scan issue_id: %v", err)
}
cached[issueID] = true
}
return cached
}
// TestCacheInvalidationOnDependencyAdd tests that adding a blocking dependency updates the cache
func TestCacheInvalidationOnDependencyAdd(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create two issues: blocker and blocked
blocker := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocker", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
blocked := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocked", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocker, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocked, "test-user")
// Initially, cache should be empty (no blocked issues)
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if len(cached) != 0 {
t.Errorf("Expected empty cache initially, got %d issues", len(cached))
}
// Add blocking dependency
dep := &types.Dependency{IssueID: blocked.ID, DependsOnID: blocker.ID, Type: types.DepBlocks}
if err := store.AddDependency(ctx, dep, "test-user"); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("AddDependency failed: %v", err)
}
// Verify blocked issue appears in cache
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[blocked.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s to be in cache after adding blocking dependency", blocked.ID)
}
if cached[blocker.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s NOT to be in cache (it's the blocker, not blocked)", blocker.ID)
}
}
// TestCacheInvalidationOnDependencyRemove tests that removing a blocking dependency updates the cache
func TestCacheInvalidationOnDependencyRemove(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create blocker → blocked relationship
blocker := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocker", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
blocked := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocked", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocker, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocked, "test-user")
dep := &types.Dependency{IssueID: blocked.ID, DependsOnID: blocker.ID, Type: types.DepBlocks}
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep, "test-user")
// Verify blocked issue is in cache
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[blocked.ID] {
t.Fatalf("Setup failed: expected %s in cache before removal", blocked.ID)
}
// Remove the blocking dependency
if err := store.RemoveDependency(ctx, blocked.ID, blocker.ID, "test-user"); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("RemoveDependency failed: %v", err)
}
// Verify blocked issue removed from cache
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[blocked.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s to be removed from cache after removing blocking dependency", blocked.ID)
}
}
// TestCacheInvalidationOnStatusChange tests cache updates when blocker status changes
func TestCacheInvalidationOnStatusChange(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create blocker → blocked relationship
blocker := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocker", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
blocked := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocked", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocker, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocked, "test-user")
dep := &types.Dependency{IssueID: blocked.ID, DependsOnID: blocker.ID, Type: types.DepBlocks}
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep, "test-user")
// Initially blocked issue should be in cache
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[blocked.ID] {
t.Fatalf("Setup failed: expected %s in cache", blocked.ID)
}
// Close the blocker
if err := store.CloseIssue(ctx, blocker.ID, "Done", "test-user"); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("CloseIssue failed: %v", err)
}
// Verify blocked issue removed from cache (blocker is closed)
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[blocked.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s to be removed from cache after blocker closed", blocked.ID)
}
// Reopen the blocker
updates := map[string]interface{}{"status": string(types.StatusOpen)}
if err := store.UpdateIssue(ctx, blocker.ID, updates, "test-user"); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("UpdateIssue (reopen) failed: %v", err)
}
// Verify blocked issue added back to cache
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[blocked.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s to be added back to cache after blocker reopened", blocked.ID)
}
}
// TestCacheConsistencyAcrossOperations tests cache stays consistent through multiple changes
func TestCacheConsistencyAcrossOperations(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create multiple issues: blocker1, blocker2, blocked1, blocked2
blocker1 := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocker 1", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
blocker2 := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocker 2", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
blocked1 := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocked 1", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
blocked2 := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocked 2", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocker1, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocker2, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocked1, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocked2, "test-user")
// Operation 1: Add blocker1 → blocked1
dep1 := &types.Dependency{IssueID: blocked1.ID, DependsOnID: blocker1.ID, Type: types.DepBlocks}
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep1, "test-user")
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[blocked1.ID] || cached[blocked2.ID] {
t.Errorf("After op1: expected only blocked1 in cache, got: %v", cached)
}
// Operation 2: Add blocker2 → blocked2
dep2 := &types.Dependency{IssueID: blocked2.ID, DependsOnID: blocker2.ID, Type: types.DepBlocks}
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep2, "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[blocked1.ID] || !cached[blocked2.ID] {
t.Errorf("After op2: expected both blocked1 and blocked2 in cache, got: %v", cached)
}
// Operation 3: Close blocker1
store.CloseIssue(ctx, blocker1.ID, "Done", "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[blocked1.ID] || !cached[blocked2.ID] {
t.Errorf("After op3: expected only blocked2 in cache, got: %v", cached)
}
// Operation 4: Remove blocker2 → blocked2 dependency
store.RemoveDependency(ctx, blocked2.ID, blocker2.ID, "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if len(cached) != 0 {
t.Errorf("After op4: expected empty cache, got: %v", cached)
}
}
// TestParentChildTransitiveBlocking tests that children of blocked parents appear in cache
func TestParentChildTransitiveBlocking(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create: blocker → epic → task1, task2
blocker := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocker", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
epic := &types.Issue{Title: "Epic", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeEpic}
task1 := &types.Issue{Title: "Task 1", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
task2 := &types.Issue{Title: "Task 2", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocker, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, epic, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, task1, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, task2, "test-user")
// Add blocking dependency: epic blocked by blocker
depBlock := &types.Dependency{IssueID: epic.ID, DependsOnID: blocker.ID, Type: types.DepBlocks}
store.AddDependency(ctx, depBlock, "test-user")
// Add parent-child relationships: task1 and task2 are children of epic
depChild1 := &types.Dependency{IssueID: task1.ID, DependsOnID: epic.ID, Type: types.DepParentChild}
depChild2 := &types.Dependency{IssueID: task2.ID, DependsOnID: epic.ID, Type: types.DepParentChild}
store.AddDependency(ctx, depChild1, "test-user")
store.AddDependency(ctx, depChild2, "test-user")
// Verify all children appear in cache (transitive blocking)
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[epic.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected epic to be in cache (directly blocked)")
}
if !cached[task1.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected task1 to be in cache (parent is blocked)")
}
if !cached[task2.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected task2 to be in cache (parent is blocked)")
}
if cached[blocker.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected blocker NOT to be in cache (it's the blocker)")
}
// Expected: exactly 3 blocked issues (epic, task1, task2)
if len(cached) != 3 {
t.Errorf("Expected 3 blocked issues in cache, got %d: %v", len(cached), cached)
}
}
// TestRelatedDepsDoNotAffectCache tests that 'related' dependencies don't cause cache entries
func TestRelatedDepsDoNotAffectCache(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
issue1 := &types.Issue{Title: "Issue 1", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
issue2 := &types.Issue{Title: "Issue 2", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, issue1, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, issue2, "test-user")
// Add 'related' dependency (should NOT cause blocking)
dep := &types.Dependency{IssueID: issue2.ID, DependsOnID: issue1.ID, Type: types.DepRelated}
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep, "test-user")
// Cache should be empty (related deps don't block)
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if len(cached) != 0 {
t.Errorf("Expected empty cache (related deps don't block), got: %v", cached)
}
}
// TestDeepHierarchyCacheCorrectness tests cache handles deep parent-child hierarchies
func TestDeepHierarchyCacheCorrectness(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create blocker → level0 → level1 → level2 → level3
blocker := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocker", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocker, "test-user")
var issues []*types.Issue
for i := 0; i < 4; i++ {
issue := &types.Issue{
Title: "Level " + strconv.Itoa(i),
Status: types.StatusOpen,
Priority: 1,
IssueType: types.TypeEpic,
}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, issue, "test-user")
issues = append(issues, issue)
if i == 0 {
// First level: blocked by blocker
dep := &types.Dependency{IssueID: issue.ID, DependsOnID: blocker.ID, Type: types.DepBlocks}
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep, "test-user")
} else {
// Each subsequent level: child of previous level
dep := &types.Dependency{IssueID: issue.ID, DependsOnID: issues[i-1].ID, Type: types.DepParentChild}
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep, "test-user")
}
}
// Verify all 4 levels are in cache
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if len(cached) != 4 {
t.Errorf("Expected 4 blocked issues in cache, got %d", len(cached))
}
for i, issue := range issues {
if !cached[issue.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected level %d (issue %s) to be in cache", i, issue.ID)
}
}
// Close the blocker and verify all become unblocked
store.CloseIssue(ctx, blocker.ID, "Done", "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if len(cached) != 0 {
t.Errorf("Expected empty cache after closing blocker, got %d issues: %v", len(cached), cached)
}
}
// TestMultipleBlockersInCache tests issue blocked by multiple blockers
func TestMultipleBlockersInCache(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create blocker1 → blocked ← blocker2
blocker1 := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocker 1", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
blocker2 := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocker 2", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
blocked := &types.Issue{Title: "Blocked", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocker1, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocker2, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, blocked, "test-user")
// Add both blocking dependencies
dep1 := &types.Dependency{IssueID: blocked.ID, DependsOnID: blocker1.ID, Type: types.DepBlocks}
dep2 := &types.Dependency{IssueID: blocked.ID, DependsOnID: blocker2.ID, Type: types.DepBlocks}
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep1, "test-user")
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep2, "test-user")
// Verify blocked issue appears in cache
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[blocked.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s to be in cache (blocked by 2 issues)", blocked.ID)
}
// Close one blocker - should still be blocked
store.CloseIssue(ctx, blocker1.ID, "Done", "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[blocked.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s to still be in cache (still blocked by blocker2)", blocked.ID)
}
// Close the second blocker - should be unblocked
store.CloseIssue(ctx, blocker2.ID, "Done", "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[blocked.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s to be removed from cache (both blockers closed)", blocked.ID)
}
}
// TestConditionalBlocksCache tests the conditional-blocks dependency type (bd-kzda)
// B runs only if A fails. B is blocked until A is closed with a failure close reason.
func TestConditionalBlocksCache(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create A (potential failure) -> B (conditional on A's failure)
issueA := &types.Issue{Title: "Issue A", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
issueB := &types.Issue{Title: "Issue B (runs if A fails)", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, issueA, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, issueB, "test-user")
// Add conditional-blocks dependency: B depends on A failing
dep := &types.Dependency{IssueID: issueB.ID, DependsOnID: issueA.ID, Type: types.DepConditionalBlocks}
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep, "test-user")
// Initially: A is open, so B should be blocked
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[issueB.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s to be blocked (A is still open)", issueB.ID)
}
// Close A with SUCCESS (no failure keywords) - B should STILL be blocked
store.CloseIssue(ctx, issueA.ID, "Completed successfully", "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[issueB.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s to be blocked (A succeeded, condition not met)", issueB.ID)
}
// Reopen A
store.UpdateIssue(ctx, issueA.ID, map[string]interface{}{"status": types.StatusOpen}, "test-user")
// Close A with FAILURE - B should now be UNBLOCKED
store.CloseIssue(ctx, issueA.ID, "Task failed due to timeout", "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[issueB.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected %s to be unblocked (A failed, condition met)", issueB.ID)
}
}
// TestConditionalBlocksVariousFailureKeywords tests that various failure keywords unlock B
func TestConditionalBlocksVariousFailureKeywords(t *testing.T) {
failureReasons := []string{
"failed",
"rejected",
"wontfix",
"won't fix",
"cancelled",
"canceled",
"abandoned",
"blocked",
"error",
"timeout",
"aborted",
}
for _, reason := range failureReasons {
t.Run(reason, func(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
issueA := &types.Issue{Title: "Issue A", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
issueB := &types.Issue{Title: "Issue B", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, issueA, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, issueB, "test-user")
dep := &types.Dependency{IssueID: issueB.ID, DependsOnID: issueA.ID, Type: types.DepConditionalBlocks}
store.AddDependency(ctx, dep, "test-user")
// Close A with failure reason
store.CloseIssue(ctx, issueA.ID, "Closed: "+reason, "test-user")
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[issueB.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected B to be unblocked after A closed with '%s'", reason)
}
})
}
}
// TestWaitsForAllChildren tests the waits-for dependency with all-children gate (bd-xo1o.2)
// B waits for spawner A's children. B is blocked until ALL children of A are closed.
func TestWaitsForAllChildren(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create spawner (A) with two children (C1, C2), and waiter (B) that waits for A's children
spawner := &types.Issue{Title: "Spawner", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
child1 := &types.Issue{Title: "Child 1", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
child2 := &types.Issue{Title: "Child 2", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
waiter := &types.Issue{Title: "Waiter", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, spawner, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, child1, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, child2, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, waiter, "test-user")
// Add parent-child relationships: C1, C2 are children of spawner
depChild1 := &types.Dependency{IssueID: child1.ID, DependsOnID: spawner.ID, Type: types.DepParentChild}
depChild2 := &types.Dependency{IssueID: child2.ID, DependsOnID: spawner.ID, Type: types.DepParentChild}
store.AddDependency(ctx, depChild1, "test-user")
store.AddDependency(ctx, depChild2, "test-user")
// Add waits-for dependency: waiter waits for spawner's children (default: all-children gate)
depWaits := &types.Dependency{
IssueID: waiter.ID,
DependsOnID: spawner.ID,
Type: types.DepWaitsFor,
Metadata: `{"gate":"all-children"}`,
}
store.AddDependency(ctx, depWaits, "test-user")
// Initially: both children open, waiter should be blocked
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[waiter.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected waiter to be blocked (children still open)")
}
// Close first child - waiter should still be blocked (second child still open)
store.CloseIssue(ctx, child1.ID, "Done", "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[waiter.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected waiter to still be blocked (one child still open)")
}
// Close second child - waiter should now be unblocked
store.CloseIssue(ctx, child2.ID, "Done", "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[waiter.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected waiter to be unblocked (all children closed)")
}
}
// TestWaitsForAnyChildren tests the waits-for dependency with any-children gate
// B waits for spawner A's children. B is blocked until ANY child of A is closed.
func TestWaitsForAnyChildren(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create spawner with two children, and waiter that waits for any child to close
spawner := &types.Issue{Title: "Spawner", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
child1 := &types.Issue{Title: "Child 1", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
child2 := &types.Issue{Title: "Child 2", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
waiter := &types.Issue{Title: "Waiter", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, spawner, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, child1, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, child2, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, waiter, "test-user")
// Add parent-child relationships
depChild1 := &types.Dependency{IssueID: child1.ID, DependsOnID: spawner.ID, Type: types.DepParentChild}
depChild2 := &types.Dependency{IssueID: child2.ID, DependsOnID: spawner.ID, Type: types.DepParentChild}
store.AddDependency(ctx, depChild1, "test-user")
store.AddDependency(ctx, depChild2, "test-user")
// Add waits-for dependency with any-children gate
depWaits := &types.Dependency{
IssueID: waiter.ID,
DependsOnID: spawner.ID,
Type: types.DepWaitsFor,
Metadata: `{"gate":"any-children"}`,
}
store.AddDependency(ctx, depWaits, "test-user")
// Initially: both children open, waiter should be blocked
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[waiter.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected waiter to be blocked (no children closed yet)")
}
// Close first child - waiter should now be unblocked (any-children gate satisfied)
store.CloseIssue(ctx, child1.ID, "Done", "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[waiter.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected waiter to be unblocked (any-children gate: one child closed)")
}
}
// TestWaitsForNoChildren tests waits-for when spawner has no children
// Should be unblocked immediately (vacuous truth: all 0 children are closed)
func TestWaitsForNoChildren(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create spawner with no children
spawner := &types.Issue{Title: "Spawner", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
waiter := &types.Issue{Title: "Waiter", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, spawner, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, waiter, "test-user")
// Add waits-for dependency (no children to wait for)
depWaits := &types.Dependency{
IssueID: waiter.ID,
DependsOnID: spawner.ID,
Type: types.DepWaitsFor,
Metadata: `{"gate":"all-children"}`,
}
store.AddDependency(ctx, depWaits, "test-user")
// Waiter should NOT be blocked (no children means condition is satisfied)
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[waiter.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected waiter to NOT be blocked (spawner has no children)")
}
}
// TestWaitsForDynamicChildrenAdded tests waits-for when children are added dynamically
func TestWaitsForDynamicChildrenAdded(t *testing.T) {
store, cleanup := setupTestDB(t)
defer cleanup()
ctx := context.Background()
// Create spawner with no children initially
spawner := &types.Issue{Title: "Spawner", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
waiter := &types.Issue{Title: "Waiter", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, spawner, "test-user")
store.CreateIssue(ctx, waiter, "test-user")
// Add waits-for dependency
depWaits := &types.Dependency{
IssueID: waiter.ID,
DependsOnID: spawner.ID,
Type: types.DepWaitsFor,
Metadata: `{"gate":"all-children"}`,
}
store.AddDependency(ctx, depWaits, "test-user")
// Initially: no children, waiter should be unblocked
cached := getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[waiter.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected waiter to be unblocked (no children yet)")
}
// Dynamically add a child
child := &types.Issue{Title: "Dynamic Child", Status: types.StatusOpen, Priority: 1, IssueType: types.TypeTask}
store.CreateIssue(ctx, child, "test-user")
depChild := &types.Dependency{IssueID: child.ID, DependsOnID: spawner.ID, Type: types.DepParentChild}
store.AddDependency(ctx, depChild, "test-user")
// Now waiter should be blocked (child is open)
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if !cached[waiter.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected waiter to be blocked (dynamic child added)")
}
// Close the child - waiter should be unblocked again
store.CloseIssue(ctx, child.ID, "Done", "test-user")
cached = getCachedBlockedIssues(t, store)
if cached[waiter.ID] {
t.Errorf("Expected waiter to be unblocked (dynamic child closed)")
}
}