- Add collision_test.go: comprehensive ID collision handling tests - Add delete_test.go: test soft delete, cascade, and edge cases - Improves sqlite package coverage from 57.8% to 68.2% Amp-Thread-ID: https://ampcode.com/threads/T-f4a96cad-a2a4-4f6f-af47-cd56700429f7 Co-authored-by: Amp <amp@ampcode.com>
376 lines
9.2 KiB
Go
376 lines
9.2 KiB
Go
package sqlite
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/steveyegge/beads/internal/types"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestDetectCollisions(t *testing.T) {
|
|
store := newTestStore(t, "file::memory:?mode=memory&cache=private")
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
|
|
// Create existing issue
|
|
existing := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "bd-1",
|
|
Title: "Existing Issue",
|
|
Description: "Original description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
}
|
|
if err := store.CreateIssue(ctx, existing, "test"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Failed to create existing issue: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
incoming []*types.Issue
|
|
wantExactMatches int
|
|
wantCollisions int
|
|
wantNewIssues int
|
|
checkCollisionID string
|
|
expectedConflicts []string
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "exact match - idempotent",
|
|
incoming: []*types.Issue{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "bd-1",
|
|
Title: "Existing Issue",
|
|
Description: "Original description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
wantExactMatches: 1,
|
|
wantCollisions: 0,
|
|
wantNewIssues: 0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "collision - different title",
|
|
incoming: []*types.Issue{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "bd-1",
|
|
Title: "Modified Title",
|
|
Description: "Original description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
wantExactMatches: 0,
|
|
wantCollisions: 1,
|
|
wantNewIssues: 0,
|
|
checkCollisionID: "bd-1",
|
|
expectedConflicts: []string{"title"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "collision - multiple fields",
|
|
incoming: []*types.Issue{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "bd-1",
|
|
Title: "Modified Title",
|
|
Description: "Modified description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusInProgress,
|
|
Priority: 2,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
wantExactMatches: 0,
|
|
wantCollisions: 1,
|
|
wantNewIssues: 0,
|
|
checkCollisionID: "bd-1",
|
|
expectedConflicts: []string{"title", "description", "status", "priority"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "new issue",
|
|
incoming: []*types.Issue{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "bd-2",
|
|
Title: "New Issue",
|
|
Description: "New description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeBug,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
wantExactMatches: 0,
|
|
wantCollisions: 0,
|
|
wantNewIssues: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "mixed - exact, collision, and new",
|
|
incoming: []*types.Issue{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "bd-1",
|
|
Title: "Existing Issue",
|
|
Description: "Original description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "bd-2",
|
|
Title: "New Issue",
|
|
Description: "New description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeBug,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
wantExactMatches: 1,
|
|
wantCollisions: 0,
|
|
wantNewIssues: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
result, err := DetectCollisions(ctx, store, tt.incoming)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("DetectCollisions failed: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(result.ExactMatches) != tt.wantExactMatches {
|
|
t.Errorf("ExactMatches: got %d, want %d", len(result.ExactMatches), tt.wantExactMatches)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(result.Collisions) != tt.wantCollisions {
|
|
t.Errorf("Collisions: got %d, want %d", len(result.Collisions), tt.wantCollisions)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(result.NewIssues) != tt.wantNewIssues {
|
|
t.Errorf("NewIssues: got %d, want %d", len(result.NewIssues), tt.wantNewIssues)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check collision details if expected
|
|
if tt.checkCollisionID != "" && len(result.Collisions) > 0 {
|
|
collision := result.Collisions[0]
|
|
if collision.ID != tt.checkCollisionID {
|
|
t.Errorf("Collision ID: got %s, want %s", collision.ID, tt.checkCollisionID)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(collision.ConflictingFields) != len(tt.expectedConflicts) {
|
|
t.Errorf("ConflictingFields count: got %d, want %d", len(collision.ConflictingFields), len(tt.expectedConflicts))
|
|
}
|
|
for i, field := range tt.expectedConflicts {
|
|
if i >= len(collision.ConflictingFields) || collision.ConflictingFields[i] != field {
|
|
t.Errorf("ConflictingFields[%d]: got %v, want %s", i, collision.ConflictingFields, field)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompareIssues(t *testing.T) {
|
|
base := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-1",
|
|
Title: "Base",
|
|
Description: "Base description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
Assignee: "alice",
|
|
Design: "Base design",
|
|
AcceptanceCriteria: "Base acceptance",
|
|
Notes: "Base notes",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
modify func(*types.Issue) *types.Issue
|
|
wantConflicts []string
|
|
wantNoConflicts bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "identical issues",
|
|
modify: func(i *types.Issue) *types.Issue {
|
|
copy := *i
|
|
return ©
|
|
},
|
|
wantNoConflicts: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "different title",
|
|
modify: func(i *types.Issue) *types.Issue {
|
|
copy := *i
|
|
copy.Title = "Modified"
|
|
return ©
|
|
},
|
|
wantConflicts: []string{"title"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "different description",
|
|
modify: func(i *types.Issue) *types.Issue {
|
|
copy := *i
|
|
copy.Description = "Modified"
|
|
return ©
|
|
},
|
|
wantConflicts: []string{"description"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "different status",
|
|
modify: func(i *types.Issue) *types.Issue {
|
|
copy := *i
|
|
copy.Status = types.StatusClosed
|
|
return ©
|
|
},
|
|
wantConflicts: []string{"status"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "different priority",
|
|
modify: func(i *types.Issue) *types.Issue {
|
|
copy := *i
|
|
copy.Priority = 2
|
|
return ©
|
|
},
|
|
wantConflicts: []string{"priority"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "different assignee",
|
|
modify: func(i *types.Issue) *types.Issue {
|
|
copy := *i
|
|
copy.Assignee = "bob"
|
|
return ©
|
|
},
|
|
wantConflicts: []string{"assignee"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "multiple differences",
|
|
modify: func(i *types.Issue) *types.Issue {
|
|
copy := *i
|
|
copy.Title = "Modified"
|
|
copy.Priority = 2
|
|
copy.Status = types.StatusClosed
|
|
return ©
|
|
},
|
|
wantConflicts: []string{"title", "status", "priority"},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
modified := tt.modify(base)
|
|
conflicts := compareIssues(base, modified)
|
|
|
|
if tt.wantNoConflicts {
|
|
if len(conflicts) != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Expected no conflicts, got %v", conflicts)
|
|
}
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(conflicts) != len(tt.wantConflicts) {
|
|
t.Errorf("Conflict count: got %d, want %d (conflicts: %v)", len(conflicts), len(tt.wantConflicts), conflicts)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, wantField := range tt.wantConflicts {
|
|
found := false
|
|
for _, gotField := range conflicts {
|
|
if gotField == wantField {
|
|
found = true
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if !found {
|
|
t.Errorf("Expected conflict field %s not found in %v", wantField, conflicts)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestHashIssueContent(t *testing.T) {
|
|
issue1 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-1",
|
|
Title: "Issue",
|
|
Description: "Description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
Assignee: "alice",
|
|
Design: "Design",
|
|
AcceptanceCriteria: "Acceptance",
|
|
Notes: "Notes",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
issue2 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-1",
|
|
Title: "Issue",
|
|
Description: "Description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
Assignee: "alice",
|
|
Design: "Design",
|
|
AcceptanceCriteria: "Acceptance",
|
|
Notes: "Notes",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
issue3 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-1",
|
|
Title: "Different",
|
|
Description: "Description",
|
|
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
|
Assignee: "alice",
|
|
Design: "Design",
|
|
AcceptanceCriteria: "Acceptance",
|
|
Notes: "Notes",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
hash1 := hashIssueContent(issue1)
|
|
hash2 := hashIssueContent(issue2)
|
|
hash3 := hashIssueContent(issue3)
|
|
|
|
if hash1 != hash2 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Expected identical issues to have same hash, got %s vs %s", hash1, hash2)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if hash1 == hash3 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Expected different issues to have different hashes")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Verify hash is deterministic
|
|
hash1Again := hashIssueContent(issue1)
|
|
if hash1 != hash1Again {
|
|
t.Errorf("Hash function not deterministic: %s vs %s", hash1, hash1Again)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestHashIssueContentWithExternalRef(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ref1 := "JIRA-123"
|
|
ref2 := "JIRA-456"
|
|
|
|
issueWithRef1 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-1",
|
|
Title: "Issue",
|
|
ExternalRef: &ref1,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
issueWithRef2 := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-1",
|
|
Title: "Issue",
|
|
ExternalRef: &ref2,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
issueNoRef := &types.Issue{
|
|
ID: "test-1",
|
|
Title: "Issue",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
hash1 := hashIssueContent(issueWithRef1)
|
|
hash2 := hashIssueContent(issueWithRef2)
|
|
hash3 := hashIssueContent(issueNoRef)
|
|
|
|
if hash1 == hash2 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Expected different external refs to produce different hashes")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if hash1 == hash3 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Expected issue with external ref to differ from issue without")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|