fix: recommend 'gt daemon start' instead of invalid 'gt daemon init'
The gt doctor patrol-hooks-wired check was recommending 'gt daemon init' which doesn't exist. The daemon is auto-initialized when running 'gt daemon start', so that's the correct command to recommend. Fixes #94 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ func (c *PatrolMoleculesExistCheck) Fix(ctx *CheckContext) error {
|
|||||||
rigPath := filepath.Join(ctx.TownRoot, rigName)
|
rigPath := filepath.Join(ctx.TownRoot, rigName)
|
||||||
for _, mol := range missing {
|
for _, mol := range missing {
|
||||||
desc := getPatrolMoleculeDesc(mol)
|
desc := getPatrolMoleculeDesc(mol)
|
||||||
cmd := exec.Command("bd", "create",
|
cmd := exec.Command("bd", "create", //nolint:gosec // G204: args are constructed internally
|
||||||
"--type=molecule",
|
"--type=molecule",
|
||||||
"--title="+mol,
|
"--title="+mol,
|
||||||
"--description="+desc,
|
"--description="+desc,
|
||||||
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ func (c *PatrolHooksWiredCheck) Run(ctx *CheckContext) *CheckResult {
|
|||||||
Name: c.Name(),
|
Name: c.Name(),
|
||||||
Status: StatusWarning,
|
Status: StatusWarning,
|
||||||
Message: "Daemon config not found",
|
Message: "Daemon config not found",
|
||||||
FixHint: "Run 'gt daemon init' to configure daemon",
|
FixHint: "Run 'gt daemon start' to start the daemon",
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ func (c *PatrolHooksWiredCheck) Run(ctx *CheckContext) *CheckResult {
|
|||||||
Name: c.Name(),
|
Name: c.Name(),
|
||||||
Status: StatusWarning,
|
Status: StatusWarning,
|
||||||
Message: "Patrol hooks not configured in daemon",
|
Message: "Patrol hooks not configured in daemon",
|
||||||
FixHint: "Configure patrols in mayor/daemon.json or run 'gt daemon init'",
|
FixHint: "Configure patrols in mayor/daemon.json or run 'gt daemon start'",
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user