docs: clarify name pool vs polecat pool misconception
Fix misleading language that could suggest polecats wait in an idle pool: - refinery/engineer.go: "available polecat" → "fresh polecat (spawned on demand)" - namepool.go: Clarify this pools NAMES not polecats; polecats are spawned fresh and nuked when done, only name slots are reused - dog-pool-architecture.md: "Pool allocation pattern" → "Name slot allocation pattern (pool of names, not instances)" There is no idle pool of polecats. They are spawned for work and nuked when done. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Steve Yegge
parent
98b11eda3c
commit
b9ecb7b82e
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ func (e *Engineer) handleFailureFromQueue(mr *mrqueue.MR, result ProcessResult)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// createConflictResolutionTask creates a dispatchable task for resolving merge conflicts.
|
||||
// This task will be picked up by bd ready and can be dispatched to an available polecat.
|
||||
// This task will be picked up by bd ready and can be slung to a fresh polecat (spawned on demand).
|
||||
// Returns the created task's ID for blocking the MR until resolution.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Task format:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user