Deacon has no rig-level presence - only global gt-deacon

The Deacon patrol role exists only at the global level (~/gt/deacon) but doesn't have per-rig presence like Witness and Refinery.

Current structure:
```
~/gt/
├── deacon/           ← Global deacon only
├── beads/
│   ├── witness/      ← Per-rig witness
│   ├── refinery/     ← Per-rig refinery
│   └── (no deacon)   ← Missing
└── gastown/
    ├── witness/
    ├── refinery/
    └── (no deacon)   ← Missing
```

Question: Should Deacon be per-rig like Witness/Refinery, or is global-only intentional?

If per-rig is needed: Create beads/deacon and gastown/deacon with appropriate CLAUDE.md files.


decide-actions

Apply nudge matrix and queue actions.

Progressive nudge levels:
- Level 1: Gentle reminder
- Level 2: Stronger nudge
- Level 3: Final warning
- Level 4: Escalate to Mayor

Needs: inspect-workers


Digest: mol-deacon-patrol

Patrol #11


Digest: mol-deacon-patrol @ 2025-12-24 19:21

Patrol 3: all healthy, no work


mol-deacon-patrol

Mayor's daemon patrol loop.

The Deacon is the Mayor's background process that runs continuously, handling callbacks, monitoring rig health, and performing cleanup. Each patrol cycle runs these steps in sequence, then loops or exits.


Remove .gastown/ after migration complete

Final cleanup:
- Remove .gastown/ directories at town and rig levels
- Remove daemon/ and deacon/ directories (replaced by .runtime/)
- Update .gitignore to remove old patterns
- Verify all tests pass with new structure


Design GGT prompt architecture

Audit PGT prompts and design canonical prompt system for GGT. Create docs/prompts.md with inventory, gap analysis, and Witness prompt design.


Digest: mol-deacon-patrol

Patrol 18: all clear


CLI API Audit: gt and bd command structure review before OSS launch

# CLI API Audit for OSS Launch

Before launching Gas Town + Beads as an SDK, we need to ensure the command-line
API is intelligently designed, consistent, intuitive, and structurally sound.

## Current State Audit

### gt (Gas Town) - 50+ top-level commands

**Agent Lifecycle:**
- `gt mayor`, `gt deacon`, `gt witness`, `gt refinery` - agent management
- `gt polecat` - worker management (subcommands: add, remove, list, etc.)
- `gt crew` - persistent workspace management
- `gt spawn` - create polecat with work

**Work Lifecycle:**
- `gt spawn` - assign work to new polecat
- `gt sling` - hook work + start immediately
- `gt hook` - attach work durably
- `gt handoff` - pass work to fresh session
- `gt done` - signal work complete
- `gt release` - release stuck issues

**Infrastructure:**
- `gt daemon`, `gt up`, `gt down`, `gt start`, `gt stop`, `gt shutdown`
- `gt init`, `gt install`, `gt doctor`

**Communication:**
- `gt mail` (subcommands: send, inbox, read, etc.)
- `gt nudge`, `gt broadcast`

**Molecules:**
- `gt molecule` / `gt mol` (17 subcommands!)

### bd (Beads) - Well-categorized but some sprawl

**Core CRUD:**
- `bd create`, `bd show`, `bd update`, `bd close`, `bd list`

**Molecules:**
- `bd mol` (5 subcommands: catalog, show, bond, run, distill)
- `bd wisp` (3 subcommands: create, gc, list)
- `bd pour` (top-level alias for instantiation)
- `bd cook` (compile formula to proto)

**Hook/Pin:**
- `bd pin` - attach mol to agent hook
- `bd unpin` - remove from hook
- `bd hook` - inspect what's on hook

## Structural Concerns

### 1. gt is sprawling (50+ top-level commands)

Many commands could be subcommands:
```
# Current                      # Could be
gt up/down/start/stop         gt daemon {up|down|start|stop}
gt spawn/sling/hook/handoff   gt work {spawn|sling|hook|handoff}
gt mayor/deacon/witness       gt agent {mayor|deacon|witness|...}
```

### 2. Overlap between gt and bd

| Concept | gt | bd |
|---------|----|----|
| Hook | `gt hook` | `bd pin`, `bd hook` |
| Mail | `gt mail` | `bd mail` (delegates) |
| Molecules | `gt mol` (17 cmds) | `bd mol` (5 cmds) |

Which owns what? User confusion likely.

### 3. Naming inconsistencies

- `gt polecat` (noun) vs `gt spawn` (verb) - both about polecats
- `gt done` vs `gt handoff` - both end work but different
- `bd mol run` vs `bd pour` - both instantiate

### 4. Subcommand depth decisions

**Good patterns:**
- `bd mol {catalog|show|bond|run|distill}` - coherent group
- `gt mail {send|inbox|read|archive}` - coherent group

**Questionable patterns:**
- `bd create --wisp` AND `bd wisp create` - two ways to do same thing
- `gt spawn --molecule X` AND `gt mol instantiate` - overlap

### 5. Flag vs subcommand guidelines needed

When to use flags vs subcommands?
- `--json` as flag ✓ (modifier)
- `--wisp` as flag for create? Or separate `bd wisp create`?
- `--molecule` on spawn? Or separate workflow?

## Recommendations to Evaluate

### A. Consolidate gt top-level commands

Group related commands:
```
gt agent {mayor|deacon|witness|refinery|polecat}
gt work {spawn|sling|hook|handoff|done}
gt infra {daemon|up|down|doctor}
```

### B. Clarify gt vs bd ownership

| Domain | Owner | Other defers |
|--------|-------|--------------|
| Issues | bd | gt uses bd |
| Agents | gt | bd doesn't touch |
| Molecules | bd mol | gt mol wraps for UX |
| Hooks | bd pin/hook | gt hook wraps |
| Mail | gt mail | bd mail delegates |

### C. Apply consistent naming

- All agent commands: nouns (`gt polecat`, `gt mayor`)
- All work commands: verbs (`gt spawn`, `gt sling`, `gt hook`)
- Avoid synonyms: pick one term and stick with it

### D. Flag vs subcommand rule

- Flags: modify behavior of command (`--json`, `--force`, `--wisp`)
- Subcommands: distinct operations (`mol run`, `mol squash`, `mol burn`)
- Exception: very common operations can have top-level aliases

## Tasks

1. [ ] Review gt command groupings - propose consolidation
2. [ ] Review bd command groupings - check for sprawl
3. [ ] Document gt vs bd ownership boundaries
4. [ ] Identify and resolve naming inconsistencies
5. [ ] Document flag vs subcommand decision criteria
6. [ ] Create migration plan for any breaking changes
7. [ ] Update help text to be consistent
8. [ ] Test agent UX: can Claude guess commands correctly?

## Success Criteria

- New user can guess command structure intuitively
- `gt --help` fits on one screen (or is well-categorized)
- No duplicate functionality between gt and bd
- Consistent naming throughout
- Claude agents can discover commands without documentation


Digest: mol-deacon-patrol

Patrol 9: routine, all healthy


Digest: mol-deacon-patrol

Patrol complete: 0 messages, agents healthy, no cleanup needed


Per-rig beads repo configuration

Add per-rig beads configuration to rig config schema.

## Config Schema

In each rig's config.json:

```json
{
  "version": 1,
  "name": "wyvern",
  "git_url": "https://github.com/steveyegge/wyvern",
  "beads": {
    "repo": "local",    // "local" | "<path>" | "<git-url>"
    "root": null,       // Override bd --root (optional)
    "prefix": "wyv"     // Issue prefix for this rig
  }
}
```

## Repo Options

| Value | Meaning | Use Case |
|-------|---------|----------|
| `"local"` | Use project's `.beads/` | Own projects, full commit access |
| `"<path>"` | Use beads at path | OSS contributions |
| `"<git-url>"` | Clone and use repo | Team shared beads |

## Environment Injection

When spawning polecats, Gas Town sets:
```bash
export BEADS_ROOT="<resolved-path>"
```

## Resolution Logic

```go
func ResolveBeadsRoot(rigConfig *RigConfig, rigPath string) (string, error) {
    beads := rigConfig.Beads
    switch {
    case beads.Root != "":
        return beads.Root, nil
    case beads.Repo == "local" || beads.Repo == "":
        return filepath.Join(rigPath, ".beads"), nil
    case strings.HasPrefix(beads.Repo, "/"):
        return beads.Repo, nil
    case strings.Contains(beads.Repo, "://"):
        return cloneAndResolve(beads.Repo)
    default:
        return filepath.Join(rigPath, beads.Repo), nil
    }
}
```

## Backwards Compatibility

If `beads` section missing, assume `"repo": "local"`.


Digest: mol-deacon-patrol @ 2025-12-24 20:23

Patrol complete: inbox clear, all agents healthy, no orphans


Patrol formulas: Inconsistent variable placeholder syntax

The patrol formulas use inconsistent syntax for variable placeholders:

## Inconsistency

| Formula | Syntax | Examples |
|---------|--------|----------|
| mol-polecat-arm | `{{var}}` | `{{polecat_name}}`, `{{rig}}` |
| mol-witness-patrol | `<var>` | `<rig>`, `<handoff-bead-id>` |
| mol-refinery-patrol | `<var>` | `<polecat-branch>` |

## Expected

All formulas should use consistent syntax, probably `{{var}}` since that's what
the variables section defines.

## Fix

Update mol-witness-patrol and mol-refinery-patrol to use `{{var}}` syntax
where appropriate, or document that `<var>` is for human-filled placeholders
vs `{{var}}` for cook-time interpolation.


Digest: mol-deacon-patrol

Patrol 11


Digest: mol-deacon-patrol

Patrol 9


mol-deacon-patrol

Mayor's daemon patrol loop.

The Deacon is the Mayor's background process that runs continuously,
handling callbacks, monitoring rig health, and performing cleanup.
Each patrol cycle runs these steps in sequence, then loops or exits.


Digest: mol-deacon-patrol

Patrol complete: inbox empty, all agents healthy, cleaned 4 orphans (gt-wx0w, gt-kp3s3, gt-6n1cy, gt-i4lo)


load-context

Run gt prime and bd prime. Verify issue assignment.
Check inbox for any relevant messages.

Read the assigned issue ({{issue}}) and understand the requirements.
Identify any blockers or missing information.


Implement gt watch command scaffold

Basic bubbletea TUI scaffold for 'gt watch' command. Discovers rigs, connects to daemons, renders placeholder view. Foundation for the full activity feed TUI.


Test Patrol for Bonding

Parent issue for mol bond CLI test


Inconsistent error wrapping patterns

Error handling is inconsistent across the codebase:

1. Some functions use fmt.Errorf with %w for wrapping, others don't
2. return nil, nil patterns (40+ occurrences) sometimes represent 'not found' and sometimes 'error but continue' - should use sentinel errors
3. Some places return nil for errors when they should propagate them

Examples of nil,nil that might need review:
- internal/git/git.go:272, 308
- internal/crew/manager.go:227
- internal/witness/manager.go:517, 523, 530, 775
- internal/beads/beads.go:225, 492


Mail system: JSONL inbox, delivery, tmux injection

Refactor mail system to wrap bd mail commands.

## Status

Current implementation uses JSONL files directly. Now that Beads mail is available (gt-r01 closed), refactor to use bd mail as the backend.

## Implementation

Replace internal/mail/* with thin wrappers around bd CLI:

```go
// Send wraps: bd mail send <to> -s <subject> -m <body>
func (r *Router) Send(msg *Message) error

// List wraps: bd mail inbox --json
func (m *Mailbox) List() ([]*Message, error)

// Get wraps: bd mail read <id> --json
func (m *Mailbox) Get(id string) (*Message, error)

// MarkRead wraps: bd mail ack <id>
func (m *Mailbox) MarkRead(id string) error
```

## Address Translation

GGT addresses → Beads recipients:
- `mayor/` → `mayor`
- `<rig>/refinery` → `<rig>-refinery`
- `<rig>/<polecat>` → `<rig>-<polecat>`

## Tmux Notification

Keep the tmux injection for --notify flag. After bd mail send, optionally inject notification into tmux session.

## Migration

No migration needed - bd mail creates messages as beads issues with type=message. Old JSONL inboxes can be ignored or cleaned up.

## Dependencies

- gt-r01: CLOSED (Beads mail available)
- gt-u1j.4: Tmux wrapper (for notifications)


Digest: mol-deacon-patrol

Patrol complete: fixed EMERGENCY clone divergence (zoey 103 behind, refinery 40 behind), cleaned orphan processes, created patrol molecules, fixed invalid hook attachments


Plugin: Plan-to-Epic converter

## Purpose

Help users create beads epics from various planning inputs.

## Inputs
- Markdown task lists
- GitHub issues
- Linear/Jira exports
- Free-form descriptions
- Existing beads epics

## Output
- Beads epic with properly structured children
- Dependencies set for wave ordering
- Priorities assigned
- Ready for `gt spawn --epic <id>`

## Implementation Options

### Option A: CLI Tool
```bash
gt plan import --from github --repo owner/repo --label batch-candidate
gt plan import --from markdown tasks.md
gt plan structure <epic-id>  # analyze and add dependencies
```

### Option B: Plugin Agent
A plugin at `<rig>/plugins/plan-oracle/` that:
- Receives planning requests via mail
- Analyzes scope and requirements
- Creates structured beads epic
- Sets dependencies based on analysis

### Option C: Interactive Mode
```bash
gt plan create
# Walks through questions, creates epic interactively
```

## Axiom

As stated: 'The Planning phase should end in the creation of a workable Beads plan.'

This plugin bridges the gap between human planning and machine-executable work.

## Priority

P2 - Nice to have for MVP. Manual epic creation works for now.

## Note

No "swarm IDs" - output is just a beads epic with children. Workers process it independently.


Day 1.4: Create agent beads for core roles

Create agent beads with deterministic IDs:
- gt-mayor (Mayor coordinator)
- gt-witness (per-rig polecat monitor)
- gt-refinery (per-rig merge processor)

Each with role_type, rig, and initial state.

Parent: gt-d0jqp