refactor(dev): restructure Claude commands/skills directories
All checks were successful
CI / check (push) Successful in 3m16s
All checks were successful
CI / check (push) Successful in 3m16s
Correct terminology mismatch: - Rename skills/ to commands/ (these are user-invokable commands) - Create new skills/ for reference materials - Move bd_workflow.md to skills/ (it's reference material) - Add micro-skills and formulas directories - Update default.nix to install both commands and skills Commands → ~/.claude/commands/ (invokable as /command-name) Skills → ~/.claude/commands/skills/ (reference materials) Formulas → ~/.beads/formulas/ (workflow templates) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
472
home/roles/development/commands/gitea_pr_review.md
Normal file
472
home/roles/development/commands/gitea_pr_review.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Address Gitea/Forgejo PR review comments with code changes
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Gitea PR Review
|
||||
|
||||
You are tasked with **addressing** PR review comments by making code changes, then summarizing what was done. This skill drives PR progress, not just conversation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
**Comments are work items, not conversation starters.**
|
||||
|
||||
When a reviewer leaves a comment, they're identifying something that needs attention. This skill:
|
||||
1. Categorizes comments by actionability
|
||||
2. Makes code changes to address actionable comments
|
||||
3. Commits and pushes those changes
|
||||
4. Posts a single summary comment describing what was done
|
||||
|
||||
## Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
- `tea` CLI configured with a Gitea/Forgejo instance
|
||||
- Access token from tea config: `~/.config/tea/config.yml`
|
||||
- Repository must be a Gitea/Forgejo remote (not GitHub)
|
||||
- **Nix users**: All tools available via nixpkgs (`nix run nixpkgs#tea`)
|
||||
|
||||
## Initial Setup
|
||||
|
||||
When this command is invoked:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Parse the input for PR number**:
|
||||
- If a PR number is provided as argument, use it
|
||||
- If no PR number, detect from current branch (see PR Detection section)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Verify required tools are available**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
which tea
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If tea is missing:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Error: `tea` CLI not found.
|
||||
|
||||
Please install:
|
||||
- Nix: nix run nixpkgs#tea
|
||||
- Other: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea
|
||||
```
|
||||
**STOP** if tea is missing.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Extract configuration from tea config**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Read tea config (it's YAML but simple enough to grep)
|
||||
TEA_CONFIG="$HOME/.config/tea/config.yml"
|
||||
GITEA_URL=$(grep -A1 'logins:' "$TEA_CONFIG" | grep 'url:' | head -1 | sed 's/.*url: //')
|
||||
TOKEN=$(grep -A5 'logins:' "$TEA_CONFIG" | grep 'token:' | head -1 | sed 's/.*token: //')
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If config is missing or invalid:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Error: Could not read tea config at ~/.config/tea/config.yml
|
||||
|
||||
Please ensure `tea` is installed and configured:
|
||||
1. Install tea
|
||||
2. Log in: tea login add --url https://your-gitea-instance --token YOUR_TOKEN
|
||||
```
|
||||
**STOP** if config is invalid.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Detect repository info from git remote**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin)
|
||||
# Parse owner and repo from URL (handles both SSH and HTTPS)
|
||||
OWNER=$(echo "$REMOTE_URL" | sed -E 's#.*[:/]([^/]+)/[^/]+\.git$#\1#')
|
||||
REPO=$(echo "$REMOTE_URL" | sed -E 's#.*/([^/]+)\.git$#\1#')
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Ensure we're on the PR branch**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
CURRENT_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
|
||||
# Verify this branch corresponds to the PR
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Respond with**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Addressing PR review comments for PR #{PR_NUMBER}...
|
||||
|
||||
Repository: {OWNER}/{REPO}
|
||||
Branch: {CURRENT_BRANCH}
|
||||
Gitea URL: {GITEA_URL}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## PR Detection
|
||||
|
||||
If no PR number is provided, detect from the current branch:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
CURRENT_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
|
||||
tea pr list --fields index,head --output simple | grep "$CURRENT_BRANCH"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If no PR exists for the current branch, use `AskUserQuestion`:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
No PR found for branch '{CURRENT_BRANCH}'.
|
||||
|
||||
Would you like to:
|
||||
1. Enter a PR number manually
|
||||
2. Cancel
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Fetch and Parse Comments
|
||||
|
||||
Fetch all reviews and their comments:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Fetch reviews (filter out dismissed reviews)
|
||||
curl -s -H "Authorization: token $TOKEN" \
|
||||
"$GITEA_URL/api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/reviews" \
|
||||
| jq '[.[] | select(.dismissed != true)]'
|
||||
|
||||
# For each review, fetch comments
|
||||
curl -s -H "Authorization: token $TOKEN" \
|
||||
"$GITEA_URL/api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/reviews/$REVIEW_ID/comments"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Filter resolved comments**: When processing comments, skip any that have been marked as resolved. Check the `resolver` field in the comment response - if it's not null, the comment has been resolved and should be skipped.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Example: Filter to only unresolved comments
|
||||
jq '[.[] | select(.resolver == null)]'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If no reviews found or all comments are resolved:
|
||||
```
|
||||
No unresolved reviews found for PR #{PR_NUMBER}.
|
||||
Nothing to address.
|
||||
```
|
||||
**STOP** here.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Categorize Comments
|
||||
|
||||
For each comment, categorize it as one of:
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Description | Action |
|
||||
|----------|-------------|--------|
|
||||
| **actionable** | Requests a code change, addition, or fix | Launch subagent to make change |
|
||||
| **question** | Asks for clarification or explanation | Include answer in summary |
|
||||
| **acknowledged** | FYI, self-resolved, or "no action needed" noted | Note in summary |
|
||||
| **blocked** | Requires external input or is out of scope | Flag for user |
|
||||
|
||||
**Categorization heuristics**:
|
||||
- Contains "add", "change", "fix", "update", "consider adding", "should be" → **actionable**
|
||||
- Contains "?" or "why", "how", "what" → **question**
|
||||
- Contains "no need to update", "will be separate", "acknowledged" → **acknowledged**
|
||||
- Contains "discuss", "later", "out of scope", "blocked by" → **blocked**
|
||||
|
||||
Display the categorization:
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Comment Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Actionable (will make changes):
|
||||
1. {file}:{line} - "{comment_summary}" → Will add nix note to prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
### Questions (will answer in summary):
|
||||
2. {file}:{line} - "{comment_summary}" → Explain CI token approach
|
||||
|
||||
### Acknowledged (no action needed):
|
||||
3. {file}:{line} - "{comment_summary}" → Reviewer noted separate skill
|
||||
|
||||
### Blocked (needs input):
|
||||
(none)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: User Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Use `AskUserQuestion` to confirm the plan:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
I've categorized {N} comments. My plan:
|
||||
|
||||
**Will make changes for:**
|
||||
- {file}:{line}: {planned_change}
|
||||
|
||||
**Will explain in summary:**
|
||||
- {file}:{line}: {planned_explanation}
|
||||
|
||||
**No action needed:**
|
||||
- {file}:{line}: {reason}
|
||||
|
||||
Proceed with this plan?
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Options:
|
||||
1. **Proceed** - Execute the plan
|
||||
2. **Modify** - Let user adjust categorization
|
||||
3. **Cancel** - Exit without changes
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Address Actionable Comments (Parallel Subagents)
|
||||
|
||||
For each actionable comment, launch a subagent using the Task tool:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Launch Task subagent with:
|
||||
- subagent_type: "general-purpose"
|
||||
- prompt: |
|
||||
You are addressing a PR review comment. Make the requested change and nothing else.
|
||||
|
||||
**File**: {file_path}
|
||||
**Line**: {line_number}
|
||||
**Comment**: {comment_body}
|
||||
**Diff context**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
{diff_hunk}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Instructions:
|
||||
1. Read the file to understand context
|
||||
2. Make the minimal change to address the comment
|
||||
3. Do NOT commit - just make the edit
|
||||
4. Report what you changed
|
||||
|
||||
Be precise. Only change what's needed to address this specific comment.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Important**: Launch actionable comment subagents in parallel when they touch different files. For comments on the same file, run sequentially to avoid conflicts.
|
||||
|
||||
Wait for all subagents to complete and collect their results.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Commit and Push
|
||||
|
||||
After all subagents complete:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Stage changes**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git add -A
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Create commit with summary**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git commit -m "Address PR review comments
|
||||
|
||||
Changes made:
|
||||
- {file1}: {change_summary}
|
||||
- {file2}: {change_summary}
|
||||
|
||||
Addresses comments from review by {reviewer}"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Push to remote**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git push
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 6: Post Summary Comment
|
||||
|
||||
Post a single comment summarizing all actions taken:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
tea comment $PR_NUMBER "$(cat <<'EOF'
|
||||
## Review Comments Addressed
|
||||
|
||||
cc @{reviewer1} @{reviewer2}
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes made** (commit {SHORT_SHA}):
|
||||
- `{file1}:{line}`: {what_was_changed}
|
||||
- `{file2}:{line}`: {what_was_changed}
|
||||
|
||||
**Responses to questions**:
|
||||
- `{file3}:{line}`: {answer_to_question}
|
||||
|
||||
**Acknowledged** (no action needed):
|
||||
- `{file4}:{line}`: {reason_no_action}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
*Automated response via /gitea_pr_review*
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
)"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 7: Final Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Display to user:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## PR Review Complete
|
||||
|
||||
**Commit**: {SHA}
|
||||
**Changes**: {N} files modified
|
||||
|
||||
### Actions Taken:
|
||||
- [x] {file1}:{line} - Added nix prerequisite note
|
||||
- [x] {file2}:{line} - Explained CI approach in comment
|
||||
- [ ] {file3}:{line} - Acknowledged (separate skill)
|
||||
|
||||
**Reviewers tagged**: @{reviewer1}, @{reviewer2}
|
||||
**Comment posted**: {comment_url}
|
||||
|
||||
PR URL: {GITEA_URL}/{OWNER}/{REPO}/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: When posting the summary comment, tag all reviewers who left comments so they receive notifications about the changes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
### Subagent failed to make change
|
||||
|
||||
If a subagent fails:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Warning: Could not address comment on {file}:{line}
|
||||
|
||||
Reason: {error}
|
||||
|
||||
Options:
|
||||
1. Skip this comment and continue
|
||||
2. Retry with manual guidance
|
||||
3. Abort all changes
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Push failed
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Error pushing changes: {error}
|
||||
|
||||
Your changes are committed locally. You may need to:
|
||||
1. Pull and resolve conflicts: git pull --rebase
|
||||
2. Push again: git push
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### No actionable comments
|
||||
|
||||
If all comments are questions/acknowledged:
|
||||
```
|
||||
No code changes needed.
|
||||
|
||||
All comments are either questions or acknowledged items.
|
||||
Posting summary comment with explanations...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## API Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Endpoints Used
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Method | Endpoint |
|
||||
|--------|--------|----------|
|
||||
| List reviews | GET | `/api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews` |
|
||||
| Get review comments | GET | `/api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments` |
|
||||
| Create issue comment | POST | via `tea comment` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Review States
|
||||
|
||||
- `PENDING` - Draft review not yet submitted
|
||||
- `COMMENT` - General comment without approval/rejection
|
||||
- `APPROVE` - Approving the changes
|
||||
- `REQUEST_CHANGES` - Requesting changes before merge
|
||||
|
||||
## Shell Command Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Claude Code's bash execution has quirks. Use these patterns for reliability:
|
||||
|
||||
### curl requests
|
||||
|
||||
**DO** - Use single quotes for URL and header separately:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
curl -s 'https://git.example.com/api/v1/repos/owner/repo/pulls/1/reviews' \
|
||||
-H 'Authorization: token YOUR_TOKEN_HERE' | jq .
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**DON'T** - Variable expansion in `-H` flag often fails:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# This may fail with "blank argument" errors
|
||||
curl -s -H "Authorization: token $TOKEN" "$URL"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Iterating over reviews
|
||||
|
||||
**DO** - Run separate commands for each review ID:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
echo "=== Review 4 ===" && curl -s 'URL/reviews/4/comments' -H 'Authorization: token ...' | jq .
|
||||
echo "=== Review 5 ===" && curl -s 'URL/reviews/5/comments' -H 'Authorization: token ...' | jq .
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**DON'T** - For loops with multiline bodies often fail:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# This may cause syntax errors
|
||||
for id in 4 5 6; do
|
||||
curl -s "URL/reviews/$id/comments"
|
||||
done
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### tea comment
|
||||
|
||||
**DO** - Use single-quoted string for comment body:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
tea comment 26 '## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Changes made:
|
||||
- Item 1
|
||||
- Item 2'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**DON'T** - Heredocs may hang or timeout:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# This may hang indefinitely
|
||||
tea comment 26 "$(cat <<'EOF'
|
||||
...
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
)"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitations
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Thread replies**: Gitea API doesn't support inline thread replies. We post a single summary comment instead.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Complex changes**: For comments requiring significant refactoring, the subagent may need guidance. The skill will flag these as "blocked" for user input.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Merge conflicts**: If the branch is behind, you may need to rebase before changes can be pushed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Session
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: /gitea_pr_review 26
|
||||
Assistant: Addressing PR review comments for PR #26...
|
||||
|
||||
Repository: johno/nixos-configs
|
||||
Branch: bead/nixos-configs-vru
|
||||
Gitea URL: https://git.johnogle.info
|
||||
|
||||
## Comment Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Actionable (will make changes):
|
||||
1. gitea_pr_review.md:12 - "could we indicate nix+nixpkgs satisfies this?"
|
||||
→ Will add note that nix users can get tools via nixpkgs
|
||||
|
||||
### Questions (will answer in summary):
|
||||
(none)
|
||||
|
||||
### Acknowledged (no action needed):
|
||||
2. gitea_pr_review.md:50 - "we eventually want to run this in CI..."
|
||||
→ Reviewer noted this will be a separate skill
|
||||
|
||||
Proceed with this plan? [Proceed]
|
||||
|
||||
Launching subagent to address comment 1...
|
||||
[Subagent completes edit]
|
||||
|
||||
Committing changes...
|
||||
[abc1234] Address PR review comments
|
||||
|
||||
Pushing to remote...
|
||||
Done.
|
||||
|
||||
Posting summary comment...
|
||||
|
||||
## PR Review Complete
|
||||
|
||||
**Commit**: abc1234
|
||||
**Changes**: 1 file modified
|
||||
|
||||
### Actions Taken:
|
||||
- [x] gitea_pr_review.md:12 - Added nix prerequisite note
|
||||
- [ ] gitea_pr_review.md:50 - Acknowledged (separate skill)
|
||||
|
||||
**Comment posted**: https://git.johnogle.info/.../pulls/26#issuecomment-XXX
|
||||
|
||||
PR URL: https://git.johnogle.info/johno/nixos-configs/pulls/26
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
- `tea` CLI: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea
|
||||
- Gitea API: https://docs.gitea.com/api/
|
||||
- `/beads_workflow` for full development workflow
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user