johno/beads
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bd sync: 2025-11-03 20:54:29

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Steve Yegge
2025-11-03 20:54:29 -08:00
parent 2b1606443b
commit 0ad8a0ef01
1 changed files with 8 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
.beads/beads.jsonl
View File

@@ -1,11 +1,18 @@
{"id":"bd-149","content_hash":"c630e4d2780f0b1a9ca22cb471635970d83516c81e5a82518d28e54998c82f99","title":"Auth tokens expire too quickly","description":"## Summary\n\n[Brief description of the bug]\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\n\n1. Step 1\n2. Step 2\n3. Step 3\n\n## Expected Behavior\n\n[What should happen]\n\n## Actual Behavior\n\n[What actually happens]\n\n## Environment\n\n- OS: [e.g., macOS 15.7.1]\n- Version: [e.g., bd 0.20.1]\n- Additional context: [any relevant details]\n\n## Additional Context\n\n[Screenshots, logs, or other relevant information]\n","design":"## Root Cause Analysis\n\n[Describe the underlying cause once identified]\n\n## Proposed Fix\n\n[Outline the solution approach]\n\n## Impact Assessment\n\n- Affected features: [list]\n- Breaking changes: [yes/no and details]\n- Migration needed: [yes/no and details]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] Bug no longer reproduces with original steps\n- [ ] Regression tests added\n- [ ] Related edge cases tested\n- [ ] Documentation updated if behavior changed\n","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:54:10.671488-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:54:10.671488-08:00","labels":["bug"]}
{"id":"bd-164b","content_hash":"fd9fc7c9e966b68b55c7e60f4b9d4f59581eb79c95c4ae21cf94d2bd8a6fc5f5","title":"Add template support for issue creation","description":"Support creating issues from predefined templates to streamline common workflows like epics, bug reports, or feature proposals.\n\nExample usage:\n bd create --from-template epic \"Phase 3 Features\"\n bd create --from-template bug \"Login failure\"\n bd template list\n bd template create epic\n\nTemplates should include:\n- Pre-filled description structure\n- Suggested priority and type\n- Common labels\n- Design/acceptance criteria sections\n\nImplementation notes:\n- Store templates in .beads/templates/ directory\n- Support YAML or JSON format\n- Ship with built-in templates (epic, bug, feature)\n- Allow custom project-specific templates","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-03T18:10:18.985902-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:56:41.287303-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T19:56:41.287303-08:00"}
{"id":"bd-1ls","content_hash":"75b2e270f29e02eecdcdf9f75558efd278276f99c7eeb8f1dc1b81519e9881ef","title":"Override test","description":"## Overview\n\n[Describe the high-level goal and scope of this epic]\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- [ ] Criteria 1\n- [ ] Criteria 2\n- [ ] Criteria 3\n\n## Background\n\n[Provide context and motivation]\n\n## Scope\n\n**In Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n\n**Out of Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n","design":"## Architecture\n\n[Describe the overall architecture and approach]\n\n## Components\n\n- Component 1: [description]\n- Component 2: [description]\n\n## Dependencies\n\n[List external dependencies or constraints]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] All child issues are completed\n- [ ] Integration tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation is updated\n- [ ] Code review completed\n","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:10.01471-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:10.01471-08:00","labels":["epic"]}
{"id":"bd-1vv","content_hash":"1db907ddb55edaf7a4c06a566c4e1b8244fcd9ba5d7e2fca4d5c053e424ac515","title":"Add WebSocket support","description":"## Feature Request\n\n[Describe the desired feature]\n\n## Motivation\n\n[Why is this feature needed? What problem does it solve?]\n\n## Use Cases\n\n1. **Use Case 1**: [description]\n2. **Use Case 2**: [description]\n\n## Proposed Solution\n\n[High-level approach to implementing this feature]\n\n## Alternatives Considered\n\n- **Alternative 1**: [description and why not chosen]\n- **Alternative 2**: [description and why not chosen]\n","design":"## Technical Design\n\n[Detailed technical approach]\n\n## API Changes\n\n[New commands, flags, or APIs]\n\n## Data Model Changes\n\n[Database schema changes if any]\n\n## Implementation Notes\n\n- Note 1\n- Note 2\n\n## Testing Strategy\n\n- Unit tests: [scope]\n- Integration tests: [scope]\n- Manual testing: [steps]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] Feature implements all described use cases\n- [ ] All tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation updated (README, commands)\n- [ ] Examples added if applicable\n- [ ] No performance regressions\n","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:56:41.271215-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:56:41.271215-08:00","labels":["feature"]}
{"id":"bd-35c7","content_hash":"9b46d0c0e124d960dc1bdf297640dea38727ab05a7b19591c81244ffccde8265","title":"Add label-based filtering to bd ready command","description":"Allow filtering ready work by labels to help organize work by sprint, week, or category.\n\nExample usage:\n bd ready --label week1-2\n bd ready --label frontend,high-priority\n\nThis helps teams organize work into batches and makes it easier for agents to focus on specific categories of work.\n\nImplementation notes:\n- Add --label flag to ready command\n- Support comma-separated labels (AND logic)\n- Should work with existing ready work logic (unblocked issues)","status":"in_progress","priority":1,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-03T18:10:18.976536-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:13:50.325022-08:00"}
{"id":"bd-4ry","content_hash":"d71a38227ebcb455452f96d07ef100d9c82698aa36c2d4eef5842ca4f1a68fa9","title":"Clarify JSONL size bounds with multi-repo","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md states (line 226): 'Keep beads.jsonl small enough for agents to read (\u003c25k)'\n\nWith multi-repo hydration, it's unclear whether this bound applies to:\n- Each individual JSONL file (likely intention)\n- The total hydrated size across all repos (unclear)\n- Both (most conservative)\n\nClarification needed because:\n- VC monitors .beads/issues.jsonl size to stay under limit\n- With multi-repo, VC needs to know if each additional repo also has 25k limit\n- Agents reading hydrated data need to know total size bounds\n- Performance characteristics depend on total vs per-repo limits\n\nExample scenario:\n- Primary repo: 20k JSONL\n- Planning repo: 15k JSONL\n- Total hydrated: 35k\nIs this acceptable or does it violate the \u003c25k principle?","acceptance_criteria":"- Documentation explicitly states size bound applies per-repo or total\n- Rationale explained (why that bound matters)\n- Guidance for monitoring size with multi-repo\n- If total bound exists, formula provided (e.g., sum of all repos \u003c25k)","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:50.042748-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:50.042748-08:00"}
{"id":"bd-5iv","content_hash":"9260ad77a2fcc64520aa97f156bbf9d868d855b7a3b8491256b316f2563ca958","title":"Test Epic","description":"## Overview\n\n[Describe the high-level goal and scope of this epic]\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- [ ] Criteria 1\n- [ ] Criteria 2\n- [ ] Criteria 3\n\n## Background\n\n[Provide context and motivation]\n\n## Scope\n\n**In Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n\n**Out of Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n","design":"## Architecture\n\n[Describe the overall architecture and approach]\n\n## Components\n\n- Component 1: [description]\n- Component 2: [description]\n\n## Dependencies\n\n[List external dependencies or constraints]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] All child issues are completed\n- [ ] Integration tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation is updated\n- [ ] Code review completed\n","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:03.864229-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:03.864229-08:00","labels":["epic"]}
{"id":"bd-72w","content_hash":"4f61c75e6e438b0602085d31a889a40694c9c735d9030ea44e504fc948f9d157","title":"Q4 Platform Improvements","description":"## Overview\n\n[Describe the high-level goal and scope of this epic]\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- [ ] Criteria 1\n- [ ] Criteria 2\n- [ ] Criteria 3\n\n## Background\n\n[Provide context and motivation]\n\n## Scope\n\n**In Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n\n**Out of Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n","design":"## Architecture\n\n[Describe the overall architecture and approach]\n\n## Components\n\n- Component 1: [description]\n- Component 2: [description]\n\n## Dependencies\n\n[List external dependencies or constraints]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] All child issues are completed\n- [ ] Integration tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation is updated\n- [ ] Code review completed\n","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:54:03.794244-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:54:03.794244-08:00","labels":["epic"]}
{"id":"bd-74ee","content_hash":"6d1a4a691f8c06bdf6e770401debb18e5330ad694cf4360ca00726c0ac2fbf44","title":"Frontend task","description":"","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:11:59.358631-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:11:59.358631-08:00","labels":["frontend","week1"]}
{"id":"bd-78w","content_hash":"ed3e38fda8a1f5f8335b605c7cac5c8e644052bf58d9ee2981e8bd5019ad2bc4","title":"Test Epic 2","description":"## Overview\n\n[Describe the high-level goal and scope of this epic]\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- [ ] Criteria 1\n- [ ] Criteria 2\n- [ ] Criteria 3\n\n## Background\n\n[Provide context and motivation]\n\n## Scope\n\n**In Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n\n**Out of Scope:**\n- Item 1\n- Item 2\n","design":"## Architecture\n\n[Describe the overall architecture and approach]\n\n## Components\n\n- Component 1: [description]\n- Component 2: [description]\n\n## Dependencies\n\n[List external dependencies or constraints]\n","acceptance_criteria":"- [ ] All child issues are completed\n- [ ] Integration tests pass\n- [ ] Documentation is updated\n- [ ] Code review completed\n","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:03.878216-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:03.878216-08:00","labels":["epic"]}
{"id":"bd-824","content_hash":"c6895598595873d74698771b8687ffbd60999120fed85a5c1d7c2176d7d2976f","title":"Add migration guide for library consumers","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md has excellent migration examples for CLI users (lines 508-549) but lacks examples for library consumers like VC that use beadsLib in Go/TypeScript code.\n\nLibrary consumers need to know:\n- Whether their existing code continues to work unchanged (backward compatibility)\n- How config.toml is automatically read (transparent hydration)\n- When and how to use explicit multi-repo configuration\n- What happens if config.toml doesn't exist (defaults)\n\nExample needed:\n```go\n// Before (v0.17.3)\nstore, err := beadsLib.NewSQLiteStorage(\".beads/vc.db\")\n\n// After (v0.18.0 with multi-repo) - still works!\nstore, err := beadsLib.NewSQLiteStorage(\".beads/vc.db\")\n// Automatically reads .beads/config.toml if present\n\n// Explicit multi-repo (if needed)\ncfg := beadsLib.Config{\n Primary: \".beads/vc.db\",\n Additional: []string{\"~/.beads-planning\"},\n}\nstore, err := beadsLib.NewStorageWithConfig(cfg)\n```","acceptance_criteria":"- Section added to contributor-workflow-analysis.md for library consumers\n- Code examples showing backward compatibility\n- Code examples showing explicit multi-repo configuration\n- Guidance on when library consumers should use multi-repo vs single-repo","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:17.748337-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:17.748337-08:00"}
{"id":"bd-9b13","content_hash":"83a72169a32e4c0bd6fa48334900d52ec08c3573b3ed0bd9bd5178ede9720c49","title":"Backend task","description":"","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:11:59.359262-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:11:59.359262-08:00","labels":["backend","week1"]}
{"id":"bd-cb2f","content_hash":"99b9c1c19d5e9f38308d78f09763426777797f133d4c86edd579419e7ba4043f","title":"Week 1 task","description":"","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T19:11:59.358093-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T19:11:59.358093-08:00","labels":["frontend","week2"]}
{"id":"bd-e044","content_hash":"1bfd3f688bb25d9714b5d7af7c2297753d08cc7d1fb5dd5219555c40f33ee07f","title":"Add mermaid output format for bd dep tree","description":"Add visual dependency graph output using Mermaid format for better visualization of issue relationships.\n\nExample usage:\n bd dep tree --format mermaid \u003cissue-id\u003e\n bd dep tree --format mermaid bd-42 \u003e graph.md\n\nThis would output Mermaid syntax that can be rendered in GitHub, documentation sites, or Mermaid live editor.\n\nImplementation notes:\n- Add --format flag to dep tree command\n- Support 'text' (default) and 'mermaid' formats\n- Mermaid graph should show issue IDs, titles, and dependency types\n- Consider using flowchart LR or graph TD syntax","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-03T18:10:18.978383-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T18:10:18.978383-08:00"}
{"id":"bd-e044","content_hash":"bd0f9c72de2d340fb09226f12270115762088ea65c36d2b3ca8a17a51f3311c1","title":"Add mermaid output format for bd dep tree","description":"Add visual dependency graph output using Mermaid format for better visualization of issue relationships.\n\nExample usage:\n bd dep tree --format mermaid \u003cissue-id\u003e\n bd dep tree --format mermaid bd-42 \u003e graph.md\n\nThis would output Mermaid syntax that can be rendered in GitHub, documentation sites, or Mermaid live editor.\n\nImplementation notes:\n- Add --format flag to dep tree command\n- Support 'text' (default) and 'mermaid' formats\n- Mermaid graph should show issue IDs, titles, and dependency types\n- Consider using flowchart LR or graph TD syntax","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-03T18:10:18.978383-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:48:28.950558-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-03T20:48:28.950558-08:00"}
{"id":"bd-s02","content_hash":"911d456e4dabae028dd615b643c99058ef12e55ea523cb81cc933783c7b13546","title":"Manual task","description":"","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:10.022202-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:15:10.022202-08:00"}
{"id":"bd-u8j","content_hash":"03131b068616b353b1f6c5d96a39f50680bf296629671060a7a364e76e049485","title":"Clarify exclusive lock protocol compatibility with multi-repo","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md proposes per-repo file locking (Decision #7) using flock on JSONL files. However, VC (a downstream library consumer) uses an exclusive lock protocol (vc-195, requires Beads v0.17.3+) that allows bd daemon and VC executor to coexist.\n\nNeed to clarify:\n- Does the proposed per-repo file locking work with VC's existing exclusive lock protocol?\n- Do library consumers like VC need to adapt their locking logic?\n- Can multiple repos be locked atomically for cross-repo operations?\n\nContext: contributor-workflow-analysis.md lines 662-681","acceptance_criteria":"- Documentation explicitly states compatibility or incompatibility with existing lock protocols\n- If incompatible, migration path is documented for library consumers\n- If compatible, example showing coexistence is provided","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:08.257493-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:08.257493-08:00"}
{"id":"bd-wta","content_hash":"59b0c71f52b597b32340bf5675c0a5efa281d08ffcac72bb3ee7b6e6df58b4cf","title":"Add performance benchmarks for multi-repo hydration","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md asserts sub-second queries (line 702) and describes smart caching via file mtime tracking (Decision #4, lines 584-618), but doesn't provide concrete performance benchmarks.\n\nVC's requirement (from VC feedback section):\n- Executor polls GetReadyWork() every 5-10 seconds\n- Queries must be sub-second (ideally \u003c100ms)\n- Smart caching must avoid re-parsing JSONLs on every query\n\nSuggested performance targets to validate:\n- File stat overhead: \u003c1ms per repo\n- Hydration (when needed): \u003c500ms for typical JSONL (\u003c25k)\n- Query (from cache): \u003c10ms\n- Total GetReadyWork(): \u003c100ms (VC's requirement)\n\nAlso test at scale:\n- N=1 repo (baseline)\n- N=3 repos (typical)\n- N=10 repos (edge case)\n\nThese benchmarks are critical for library consumers like VC that run automated polling loops.","acceptance_criteria":"- Performance benchmark suite created for multi-repo hydration\n- Benchmarks cover file stat, hydration, and query times\n- Tests at N=1, N=3, N=10 repo scales\n- Results documented in contributor-workflow-analysis.md\n- Performance targets met or issues filed for optimization","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:39.331528-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:39.331528-08:00"}
{"id":"bd-x47","content_hash":"1add411c4d4919dd7179e4e944ebbd9ec3b4672b93f9f6c303ab8fe512e66d09","title":"Add guidance for self-hosting projects","description":"The contributor-workflow-analysis.md is optimized for OSS contributors making PRs to upstream projects. However, it doesn't address projects like VC that use beads for their own development (self-hosting).\n\nSelf-hosting projects differ from OSS contributors:\n- No upstream/downstream distinction (they ARE the project)\n- May run automated executors (not just humans)\n- In bootstrap/early phase (stability matters)\n- Single team/owner (not multiple contributors with permissions)\n\nGuidance needed on:\n- When self-hosting projects should stay single-repo (default, recommended)\n- When they should adopt multi-repo (team planning, multi-phase dev)\n- How automated executors should handle multi-repo (if at all)\n- Special considerations for projects in bootstrap phase\n\nExamples of self-hosting projects: VC (building itself with beads), internal tools, pet projects","acceptance_criteria":"- Section added: 'For Projects Using Beads for Self-Hosting'\n- Clear guidance on when to stay single-repo vs adopt multi-repo\n- Recommendations for automated executor behavior with multi-repo\n- Bootstrap phase considerations documented","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:27.805341-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-03T20:24:27.805341-08:00"}