Remove spurious collision-related code after ultrathink review
After 2 weeks of collision/stale-data fixes, reviewed all changes to identify
spurious code that is no longer needed after content-hash resolution was implemented.
**Removed:**
1. countReferences() function from collision.go (lines 274-328)
- Was used for reference-count based collision scoring
- Completely unused after switching to content-hash based resolution (commit 2e87329)
- Still exists in duplicates.go for deduplication (different use case)
2. ReferenceScore field from CollisionDetail struct
- Marked as DEPRECATED but never removed
- No longer used by ScoreCollisions() which now uses content hashing
3. TestCountReferences and TestCountReferencesWordBoundary tests
- Tested the now-deleted countReferences() function
- No longer relevant
**Fixed:**
- Updated CheckpointWAL comments to remove misleading "staleness detection" claim
- Staleness detection uses metadata (last_import_time), NOT file mtime
- CheckpointWAL is still valuable for data persistence and WAL size reduction
- Comments now accurately reflect actual benefits
**Verified:**
- All tests pass (internal/storage/sqlite)
- Content-hash collision resolution still works correctly
- No behavioral changes, just cleanup
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
|
||||
{"id":"bd-63","title":"Add internal/ai package for LLM integration","description":"Shared AI client for repair commands.\n\nProviders:\n- Anthropic (Claude)\n- OpenAI (GPT)\n- Ollama (local)\n\nEnv vars:\n- BEADS_AI_PROVIDER\n- BEADS_AI_API_KEY\n- BEADS_AI_MODEL\n\nFiles: internal/ai/client.go (new)","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T14:48:29.072473-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-28T14:48:29.072473-07:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-63","depends_on_id":"bd-56","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-10-28T14:48:29.073553-07:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-64","title":"Add embedding generation for duplicate detection","description":"Use embeddings for scalable duplicate detection.\n\nModel: text-embedding-3-small (OpenAI) or all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (local)\nStorage: SQLite vector extension or in-memory\nCost: ~/bin/bash.0002 per 100 issues\n\nMuch cheaper than LLM comparisons for large databases.\n\nFiles: internal/embeddings/ (new package)","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T14:48:29.072913-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-28T14:48:29.072913-07:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-64","depends_on_id":"bd-56","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-10-28T14:48:29.07486-07:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-65","title":"bd resolve-conflicts - Git merge conflict resolver","description":"Automatically resolve JSONL merge conflicts.\n\nModes:\n- Mechanical: ID remapping (no AI)\n- AI-assisted: Smart merge/keep decisions\n- Interactive: Review each conflict\n\nHandles \u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c conflict markers in .beads/beads.jsonl\n\nFiles: cmd/bd/resolve_conflicts.go (new)","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T14:48:30.083642-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-28T14:48:30.083642-07:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"bd-65","depends_on_id":"bd-56","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-10-28T14:48:30.084575-07:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-66","title":"Add fallback to polling on watcher failure","description":"Detect fsnotify.NewWatcher() errors and log warning. Auto-switch to polling mode with 5s ticker. Add BEADS_WATCHER_FALLBACK env var to control behavior.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.428439-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-28T19:23:43.595916-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-28T19:23:43.595916-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-66","title":"Add fallback to polling on watcher failure","description":"Detect fsnotify.NewWatcher() errors and log warning. Auto-switch to polling mode with 5s ticker. Add BEADS_WATCHER_FALLBACK env var to control behavior.","status":"open","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.428439-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.428439-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-67","title":"Create cmd/bd/daemon_event_loop.go (~200 LOC)","description":"Implement runEventDrivenLoop to replace polling ticker. Coordinate FileWatcher, mutation events, debouncer. Include health check ticker (60s) for daemon validation.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.429383-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.429383-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-28T12:30:44.067036-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-68","title":"Add fsnotify dependency to go.mod","description":"","status":"in_progress","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.429763-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.429763-07:00"}
|
||||
{"id":"bd-69","title":"Replace getStorageForRequest with Direct Access","description":"Replace all getStorageForRequest(req) calls with s.storage","acceptance_criteria":"- No references to getStorageForRequest() in codebase (except in deleted file)\n- All handlers use s.storage directly\n- Code compiles without errors\n\nFiles to update:\n- internal/rpc/server_issues_epics.go (~8 calls)\n- internal/rpc/server_labels_deps_comments.go (~4 calls)\n- internal/rpc/server_compact.go (~2 calls)\n- internal/rpc/server_export_import_auto.go (~2 calls)\n- internal/rpc/server_routing_validation_diagnostics.go (~1 call)\n\nPattern: store, err := s.getStorageForRequest(req) → store := s.storage","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-10-28T16:20:02.430127-07:00","updated_at":"2025-10-28T19:20:58.312809-07:00","closed_at":"2025-10-28T19:20:58.312809-07:00"}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ func ImportIssues(ctx context.Context, dbPath string, store storage.Storage, iss
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Checkpoint WAL to update main .db file timestamp
|
||||
// This ensures staleness detection sees the database as fresh
|
||||
// Checkpoint WAL to ensure data persistence and reduce WAL file size
|
||||
if err := sqliteStore.CheckpointWAL(ctx); err != nil {
|
||||
// Non-fatal - just log warning
|
||||
fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Warning: failed to checkpoint WAL: %v\n", err)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ type CollisionDetail struct {
|
||||
IncomingIssue *types.Issue // The issue from the import file
|
||||
ExistingIssue *types.Issue // The issue currently in the database
|
||||
ConflictingFields []string // List of field names that differ
|
||||
ReferenceScore int // Number of references to this issue (for scoring) - DEPRECATED
|
||||
RemapIncoming bool // If true, remap incoming; if false, remap existing
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -271,62 +270,6 @@ func ScoreCollisions(ctx context.Context, s *SQLiteStorage, collisions []*Collis
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// countReferences counts how many times an issue ID is referenced
|
||||
// Returns: text mentions + dependency references
|
||||
func countReferences(issueID string, allIssues []*types.Issue, allDeps map[string][]*types.Dependency) (int, error) {
|
||||
count := 0
|
||||
|
||||
// Count text mentions in all issues' text fields
|
||||
// Use word boundary regex to match exact IDs (e.g., "bd-10" but not "bd-100")
|
||||
pattern := fmt.Sprintf(`\b%s\b`, regexp.QuoteMeta(issueID))
|
||||
re, err := regexp.Compile(pattern)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return 0, fmt.Errorf("failed to compile regex for %s: %w", issueID, err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, issue := range allIssues {
|
||||
// Skip counting references in the issue itself
|
||||
if issue.ID == issueID {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Count mentions in description
|
||||
count += len(re.FindAllString(issue.Description, -1))
|
||||
|
||||
// Count mentions in design
|
||||
count += len(re.FindAllString(issue.Design, -1))
|
||||
|
||||
// Count mentions in notes
|
||||
count += len(re.FindAllString(issue.Notes, -1))
|
||||
|
||||
// Count mentions in acceptance criteria
|
||||
count += len(re.FindAllString(issue.AcceptanceCriteria, -1))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Count dependency references
|
||||
// An issue can be referenced as either IssueID or DependsOnID
|
||||
for _, deps := range allDeps {
|
||||
for _, dep := range deps {
|
||||
// Skip self-references
|
||||
if dep.IssueID == issueID && dep.DependsOnID == issueID {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Count if this issue is the source (IssueID)
|
||||
if dep.IssueID == issueID {
|
||||
count++
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Count if this issue is the target (DependsOnID)
|
||||
if dep.DependsOnID == issueID {
|
||||
count++
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return count, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// deduplicateIncomingIssues removes content-duplicate issues within the incoming batch
|
||||
// Returns deduplicated slice, keeping the first issue ID (lexicographically) for each unique content
|
||||
func deduplicateIncomingIssues(issues []*types.Issue) []*types.Issue {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -435,90 +435,6 @@ func intPtr(i int) *int {
|
||||
return &i
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestCountReferences(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
allIssues := []*types.Issue{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "bd-1",
|
||||
Title: "Issue 1",
|
||||
Description: "This mentions bd-2 and bd-3",
|
||||
Design: "Design mentions bd-2 twice: bd-2 and bd-2",
|
||||
Notes: "Notes mention bd-3",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "bd-2",
|
||||
Title: "Issue 2",
|
||||
Description: "This mentions bd-1",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "bd-3",
|
||||
Title: "Issue 3",
|
||||
Description: "No mentions here",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "bd-10",
|
||||
Title: "Issue 10",
|
||||
Description: "This has bd-100 but not bd-10 itself",
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
allDeps := map[string][]*types.Dependency{
|
||||
"bd-1": {
|
||||
{IssueID: "bd-1", DependsOnID: "bd-2", Type: types.DepBlocks},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"bd-2": {
|
||||
{IssueID: "bd-2", DependsOnID: "bd-3", Type: types.DepBlocks},
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tests := []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
issueID string
|
||||
expectedCount int
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "bd-1 - one text mention, one dependency",
|
||||
issueID: "bd-1",
|
||||
// Text: bd-2's description mentions bd-1 (1)
|
||||
// Deps: bd-1 → bd-2 (1)
|
||||
expectedCount: 2,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "bd-2 - multiple text mentions, two dependencies",
|
||||
issueID: "bd-2",
|
||||
// Text: bd-1's description mentions bd-2 (1) + bd-1's design mentions bd-2 three times (3) = 4
|
||||
// (design has: "mentions bd-2" + "bd-2 and" + "bd-2")
|
||||
// Deps: bd-1 → bd-2 (1) + bd-2 → bd-3 (1) = 2
|
||||
expectedCount: 6,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "bd-3 - some text mentions, one dependency",
|
||||
issueID: "bd-3",
|
||||
// Text: bd-1's description (1) + bd-1's notes (1) = 2
|
||||
// Deps: bd-2 → bd-3 (1)
|
||||
expectedCount: 3,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "bd-10 - no mentions (bd-100 doesn't count)",
|
||||
issueID: "bd-10",
|
||||
// Text: bd-100 in bd-10's description doesn't match \bbd-10\b = 0
|
||||
// Deps: none = 0
|
||||
expectedCount: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, tt := range tests {
|
||||
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
count, err := countReferences(tt.issueID, allIssues, allDeps)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("countReferences failed: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if count != tt.expectedCount {
|
||||
t.Errorf("expected count %d, got %d", tt.expectedCount, count)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestScoreCollisions(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Create temporary database
|
||||
tmpDir, err := os.MkdirTemp("", "score-collision-test-*")
|
||||
@@ -607,28 +523,24 @@ func TestScoreCollisions(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Create collision details (simulated)
|
||||
collisions := []*CollisionDetail{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "bd-1",
|
||||
IncomingIssue: issue1,
|
||||
ExistingIssue: issue1,
|
||||
ReferenceScore: 0, // Will be calculated
|
||||
ID: "bd-1",
|
||||
IncomingIssue: issue1,
|
||||
ExistingIssue: issue1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "bd-2",
|
||||
IncomingIssue: issue2,
|
||||
ExistingIssue: issue2,
|
||||
ReferenceScore: 0, // Will be calculated
|
||||
ID: "bd-2",
|
||||
IncomingIssue: issue2,
|
||||
ExistingIssue: issue2,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "bd-3",
|
||||
IncomingIssue: issue3,
|
||||
ExistingIssue: issue3,
|
||||
ReferenceScore: 0, // Will be calculated
|
||||
ID: "bd-3",
|
||||
IncomingIssue: issue3,
|
||||
ExistingIssue: issue3,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "bd-4",
|
||||
IncomingIssue: issue4,
|
||||
ExistingIssue: issue4,
|
||||
ReferenceScore: 0, // Will be calculated
|
||||
ID: "bd-4",
|
||||
IncomingIssue: issue4,
|
||||
ExistingIssue: issue4,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -656,67 +568,6 @@ func TestScoreCollisions(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestCountReferencesWordBoundary(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Test that word boundaries work correctly
|
||||
allIssues := []*types.Issue{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "bd-1",
|
||||
Description: "bd-10 and bd-100 and bd-1 and bd-11",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "bd-10",
|
||||
Description: "bd-1 and bd-100",
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
allDeps := map[string][]*types.Dependency{}
|
||||
|
||||
tests := []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
issueID string
|
||||
expectedCount int
|
||||
description string
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "bd-1 exact match",
|
||||
issueID: "bd-1",
|
||||
expectedCount: 2, // bd-10's desc mentions bd-1 (1) + bd-1's desc mentions bd-1 (1) = 2
|
||||
// Wait, bd-1's desc shouldn't count itself
|
||||
// So: bd-10's desc mentions bd-1 (1)
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "bd-10 exact match",
|
||||
issueID: "bd-10",
|
||||
expectedCount: 1, // bd-1's desc mentions bd-10 (1)
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "bd-100 exact match",
|
||||
issueID: "bd-100",
|
||||
expectedCount: 2, // bd-1's desc (1) + bd-10's desc (1)
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, tt := range tests {
|
||||
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
count, err := countReferences(tt.issueID, allIssues, allDeps)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("countReferences failed: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Adjust expected based on actual counting logic
|
||||
// countReferences skips the issue itself
|
||||
expected := tt.expectedCount
|
||||
if tt.issueID == testIssueBD1 {
|
||||
expected = 1 // only bd-10's description
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if count != expected {
|
||||
t.Errorf("expected count %d, got %d", expected, count)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestReplaceIDReferences(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
tests := []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
@@ -843,33 +694,31 @@ func TestRemapCollisions(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Create collisions (incoming issues with same IDs as DB but different content)
|
||||
collision1 := &CollisionDetail{
|
||||
ID: "bd-2",
|
||||
ID: "bd-2",
|
||||
ExistingIssue: dbIssue2,
|
||||
IncomingIssue: &types.Issue{
|
||||
ID: "bd-2",
|
||||
Title: "Collision 2 (has fewer references)",
|
||||
Title: "Collision 2",
|
||||
Description: "This is different content",
|
||||
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
||||
Priority: 1,
|
||||
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
||||
},
|
||||
RemapIncoming: true, // Incoming will be remapped
|
||||
ReferenceScore: 2, // Fewer references
|
||||
RemapIncoming: true, // Incoming will be remapped
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
collision2 := &CollisionDetail{
|
||||
ID: "bd-3",
|
||||
ID: "bd-3",
|
||||
ExistingIssue: dbIssue3,
|
||||
IncomingIssue: &types.Issue{
|
||||
ID: "bd-3",
|
||||
Title: "Collision 3 (has more references)",
|
||||
Title: "Collision 3",
|
||||
Description: "Different content for bd-3",
|
||||
Status: types.StatusOpen,
|
||||
Priority: 1,
|
||||
IssueType: types.TypeTask,
|
||||
},
|
||||
RemapIncoming: true, // Incoming will be remapped
|
||||
ReferenceScore: 5, // More references
|
||||
RemapIncoming: true, // Incoming will be remapped
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
collisions := []*CollisionDetail{collision1, collision2}
|
||||
@@ -903,7 +752,7 @@ func TestRemapCollisions(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if remappedIssue2 == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("remapped issue %s not found", newID2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if remappedIssue2.Title != "Collision 2 (has fewer references)" {
|
||||
if remappedIssue2.Title != "Collision 2" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("unexpected title for remapped issue: %s", remappedIssue2.Title)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2301,9 +2301,11 @@ func (s *SQLiteStorage) UnderlyingConn(ctx context.Context) (*sql.Conn, error) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// CheckpointWAL checkpoints the WAL file to flush changes to the main database file.
|
||||
// This updates the main .db file's modification time, which is important for staleness detection.
|
||||
// In WAL mode, writes go to the -wal file, leaving the main .db file untouched.
|
||||
// Checkpointing flushes the WAL to the main database file.
|
||||
// Checkpointing:
|
||||
// - Ensures data persistence by flushing WAL to main database
|
||||
// - Reduces WAL file size
|
||||
// - Makes database safe for backup/copy operations
|
||||
func (s *SQLiteStorage) CheckpointWAL(ctx context.Context) error {
|
||||
_, err := s.db.ExecContext(ctx, "PRAGMA wal_checkpoint(FULL)")
|
||||
return err
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user